Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2026 · 69th Convention, Phoenix › Page 340
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2026, Page 340
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
front matter 28
front matter 29
front matter 30
front matter 31
front matter 32
front matter 33
front matter 34
front matter 35
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 489
Page 490
Page 491
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Page 503
Page 504
Page 505
Page 506
Page 507
Page 508
Page 509
Page 510
Page 511
Page 512
Page 513
Page 514
Page 515
Page 516
Page 517
Page 518
Page 519
Page 520
Page 521
Page 522
Page 523
Page 524
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
340
THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
WHEREAS, The LCMS has also confessed that “The orthodox
character of a church is established not by its mere name nor by its
outward acceptance of, and subscription to, an orthodox creed, but
by the doctrine which is actually taught in its pulpits, in its
theological seminaries, and in its publications,” (A Brief Statement,
29); and
WHEREAS, In September 2023, then Archbishop Janis Vanags
publicly communed two bishops of the Anglican Church in North
America (ACNA), a heterodox church body which permits its
dioceses to ordain women, and as a matter of policy permits its
preachers to advance many false doctrines held by the Reformed,
charismatic, and Romanist churches; and
WHEREAS, During the ACNA’s 2024 Provincial Assembly, an
ecumenical dialogue report was presented that additionally testified
to this fact; and
WHEREAS, The same report testifies that the ACNA had been
accorded full altar and pulpit fellowship by the ELCL on the basis
that the ELCL already had fellowship with the wider Anglican
Communion; and
WHEREAS, Our Lord does not tell us to treat our erring brother as
a Gentile after a single rebuke, but instead requires patience (Matt.
18:16–17); and
WHEREAS, The LCMS has previously, in response to the errors
of her sister churches, declared she is in statu confessionis, in a state
of confession, which “is not tantamount to the breaking of
fellowship. If, however, the circumstances which called forth the
protest are not corrected in due time, the implication is that the
protest will lead to the severance of fellowship relations,” (1971
Convention Report 2-01, Commission on Theology and Church
Relations, Workbook, Appendix B, 39); therefore be it
Resolved, That the Synod recognize that there is not complete
doctrinal agreement with the ELCL on account of differences in the
doctrine of church fellowship; and be it further
Resolved, That the Synod declare that she is in a state of
confession against the ELCL for her unionist fellowship with the
Anglican Communion; and be it further
Resolved, That the Synod direct its President, as its chief
ecumenical officer, as well as the Commission on Theology and
Church Relations (CTCR), to provide for new doctrinal discussions
with the ELCL on the issue of church fellowship, to the end that the
ELCL might be brought to repentance; and be it further
Resolved, That the Synod implore its members to pray fervently
for true doctrinal agreement to be established by these discussions,
that we may dwell together in unity; and be it further
Resolved, That the CTCR produce a report on the status of these
discussions and their fruits, and to disseminate this report for
widespread study prior to the 2029 Synod convention; and be it
finally
Resolved, That in light of the results of these dialogues, the
Synod reconsider its relationship to the ELCL in the 2029 Synod
convention, whether to (1) rescind the state of confession; (2)
continue the state of confession; or (3) break fellowship.
Good Shepherd
Lincoln, NE
2026 Convention Workbook
Ov. 5-08
To Recognize That the Synod
Is Not in Altar and Pulpit Fellowship with
Selbständige Evangelisch-Lutherische Kirche
Preamble
Attempts to introduce women’s ordination into Selbständige
Evangelisch-Lutherische Kirche, or the Independent Evangelical
Lutheran Church in Germany (SELK) (which is currently listed as
a Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod [LCMS] partner church and a
member of the International Lutheran Council), have been actively
underway for at least 25 years. At best, the SELK is unable to give
a clear confession on God’s Word as applied to the Office of the
Holy Ministry, and accordingly, is not in altar and pulpit fellowship,
which is a gift of God that exists by His grace on the basis of
complete agreement in doctrine and practice.
In 2000, the SELK published “Die wesentlichen Argumente zur
Frage einer Ordination von Frauen zum Amt der Kirche, soweit sie
bisher in der Selbständigen Evangelischlutherischen Kirche
(SELK) geäussert wurden” (www.selk.de/download/fo-pap.pdf), or
“The Main Arguments on the Question of the Ordination of Women
to the Office of the Church, as far as they have been expressed so
far in the Independent Evangelical Lutheran Church (SELK)”.
In 2009, the SELK further published Dokumentation zum
Beratungsprozess “Ordination von Frauen zum Amt der Kirche” in
der Pfarrerschaft der SELK 1999–2009, or Documentation of the
Consultation Process “Ordination of Women to the Office of the
Church” in the Clergy of the SELK 1999–2009. One of the
documents contained therein, entitled “Gruppenantrag an den 11.
Allgemeinen Pfarrkonvent im Mai 2009 als Gegenantrag zum
Antrag der Kirchenleitung und des Kollegiums der
Superintendenten” (p. 43), 31 SELK pastors asserted in a proposed
overture (never adopted) that no consensus was reached on the
theological interpretation of Scripture regarding women’s
ordination and further, that while the ordination of women remains
prohibited in the SELK, the ordination of women was to be deemed
a matter of church order, not doctrine, and left to the church’s
discretion, and discussion would remain open.
Most recently, at the 15th General Pastoral Convention of the SELK
held June 23–27, 2025, 47 percent of the pastors present considered
it theologically possible for the SELK to have some members who
practice women’s ordination. Yet rather than repenting of the fact
that nearly half of its pastorate would allow the possibility of a
position clearly contrary to Scripture, 80 percent of the pastors
voted to assure supporters of women’s ordination of “brotherly
cooperation, respect for their position, and a willingness to listen to
their concerns” rather than rebuking those holding to this false
doctrine (Matthew Block, “SELK Pastoral Convention Offers
Clarity
on
Ordination,”
Aug.
14,
2025,
ilcouncil.org/2025/08/14/selk-pastoral-convention-offers-clarityon-ordination).
Further, 88 percent of the SELK delegates voted to “commit
themselves to continuing to promote the services of women in the
SELK as provided for in the church regulations: pastoral assistants,
lectors, church council members, church councilors, deacons,
catechists, lecturers at the Lutherischen Theologischen Hochschule,
etc.” (ibid.)
To assert that there are scriptural and confessional arguments in
favor of women’s ordination, and that the issue is not a matter of