Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2026 · 69th Convention, Phoenix › Page 340

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2026, Page 340

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 front matter 28 front matter 29 front matter 30 front matter 31 front matter 32 front matter 33 front matter 34 front matter 35 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479 Page 480 Page 481 Page 482 Page 483 Page 484 Page 485 Page 486 Page 487 Page 488 Page 489 Page 490 Page 491 Page 492 Page 493 Page 494 Page 495 Page 496 Page 497 Page 498 Page 499 Page 500 Page 501 Page 502 Page 503 Page 504 Page 505 Page 506 Page 507 Page 508 Page 509 Page 510 Page 511 Page 512 Page 513 Page 514 Page 515 Page 516 Page 517 Page 518 Page 519 Page 520 Page 521 Page 522 Page 523 Page 524

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

340

THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS

WHEREAS, The LCMS has also confessed that “The orthodox
character of a church is established not by its mere name nor by its
outward acceptance of, and subscription to, an orthodox creed, but
by the doctrine which is actually taught in its pulpits, in its
theological seminaries, and in its publications,” (A Brief Statement,
29); and
WHEREAS, In September 2023, then Archbishop Janis Vanags
publicly communed two bishops of the Anglican Church in North
America (ACNA), a heterodox church body which permits its
dioceses to ordain women, and as a matter of policy permits its
preachers to advance many false doctrines held by the Reformed,
charismatic, and Romanist churches; and
WHEREAS, During the ACNA’s 2024 Provincial Assembly, an
ecumenical dialogue report was presented that additionally testified
to this fact; and
WHEREAS, The same report testifies that the ACNA had been
accorded full altar and pulpit fellowship by the ELCL on the basis
that the ELCL already had fellowship with the wider Anglican
Communion; and
WHEREAS, Our Lord does not tell us to treat our erring brother as
a Gentile after a single rebuke, but instead requires patience (Matt.
18:16–17); and
WHEREAS, The LCMS has previously, in response to the errors
of her sister churches, declared she is in statu confessionis, in a state
of confession, which “is not tantamount to the breaking of
fellowship. If, however, the circumstances which called forth the
protest are not corrected in due time, the implication is that the
protest will lead to the severance of fellowship relations,” (1971
Convention Report 2-01, Commission on Theology and Church
Relations, Workbook, Appendix B, 39); therefore be it
Resolved, That the Synod recognize that there is not complete
doctrinal agreement with the ELCL on account of differences in the
doctrine of church fellowship; and be it further
Resolved, That the Synod declare that she is in a state of
confession against the ELCL for her unionist fellowship with the
Anglican Communion; and be it further
Resolved, That the Synod direct its President, as its chief
ecumenical officer, as well as the Commission on Theology and
Church Relations (CTCR), to provide for new doctrinal discussions
with the ELCL on the issue of church fellowship, to the end that the
ELCL might be brought to repentance; and be it further
Resolved, That the Synod implore its members to pray fervently
for true doctrinal agreement to be established by these discussions,
that we may dwell together in unity; and be it further
Resolved, That the CTCR produce a report on the status of these
discussions and their fruits, and to disseminate this report for
widespread study prior to the 2029 Synod convention; and be it
finally
Resolved, That in light of the results of these dialogues, the
Synod reconsider its relationship to the ELCL in the 2029 Synod
convention, whether to (1) rescind the state of confession; (2)
continue the state of confession; or (3) break fellowship.
Good Shepherd
Lincoln, NE

2026 Convention Workbook

Ov. 5-08

To Recognize That the Synod
Is Not in Altar and Pulpit Fellowship with
Selbständige Evangelisch-Lutherische Kirche
Preamble
Attempts to introduce women’s ordination into Selbständige
Evangelisch-Lutherische Kirche, or the Independent Evangelical
Lutheran Church in Germany (SELK) (which is currently listed as
a Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod [LCMS] partner church and a
member of the International Lutheran Council), have been actively
underway for at least 25 years. At best, the SELK is unable to give
a clear confession on God’s Word as applied to the Office of the
Holy Ministry, and accordingly, is not in altar and pulpit fellowship,
which is a gift of God that exists by His grace on the basis of
complete agreement in doctrine and practice.
In 2000, the SELK published “Die wesentlichen Argumente zur
Frage einer Ordination von Frauen zum Amt der Kirche, soweit sie
bisher in der Selbständigen Evangelischlutherischen Kirche
(SELK) geäussert wurden” (www.selk.de/download/fo-pap.pdf), or
“The Main Arguments on the Question of the Ordination of Women
to the Office of the Church, as far as they have been expressed so
far in the Independent Evangelical Lutheran Church (SELK)”.
In 2009, the SELK further published Dokumentation zum
Beratungsprozess “Ordination von Frauen zum Amt der Kirche” in
der Pfarrerschaft der SELK 1999–2009, or Documentation of the
Consultation Process “Ordination of Women to the Office of the
Church” in the Clergy of the SELK 1999–2009. One of the
documents contained therein, entitled “Gruppenantrag an den 11.
Allgemeinen Pfarrkonvent im Mai 2009 als Gegenantrag zum
Antrag der Kirchenleitung und des Kollegiums der
Superintendenten” (p. 43), 31 SELK pastors asserted in a proposed
overture (never adopted) that no consensus was reached on the
theological interpretation of Scripture regarding women’s
ordination and further, that while the ordination of women remains
prohibited in the SELK, the ordination of women was to be deemed
a matter of church order, not doctrine, and left to the church’s
discretion, and discussion would remain open.
Most recently, at the 15th General Pastoral Convention of the SELK
held June 23–27, 2025, 47 percent of the pastors present considered
it theologically possible for the SELK to have some members who
practice women’s ordination. Yet rather than repenting of the fact
that nearly half of its pastorate would allow the possibility of a
position clearly contrary to Scripture, 80 percent of the pastors
voted to assure supporters of women’s ordination of “brotherly
cooperation, respect for their position, and a willingness to listen to
their concerns” rather than rebuking those holding to this false
doctrine (Matthew Block, “SELK Pastoral Convention Offers
Clarity
on
Ordination,”
Aug.
14,
2025,
ilcouncil.org/2025/08/14/selk-pastoral-convention-offers-clarityon-ordination).
Further, 88 percent of the SELK delegates voted to “commit
themselves to continuing to promote the services of women in the
SELK as provided for in the church regulations: pastoral assistants,
lectors, church council members, church councilors, deacons,
catechists, lecturers at the Lutherischen Theologischen Hochschule,
etc.” (ibid.)
To assert that there are scriptural and confessional arguments in
favor of women’s ordination, and that the issue is not a matter of