Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2026 · 69th Convention, Phoenix › Page 62

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2026, Page 62

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 front matter 28 front matter 29 front matter 30 front matter 31 front matter 32 front matter 33 front matter 34 front matter 35 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479 Page 480 Page 481 Page 482 Page 483 Page 484 Page 485 Page 486 Page 487 Page 488 Page 489 Page 490 Page 491 Page 492 Page 493 Page 494 Page 495 Page 496 Page 497 Page 498 Page 499 Page 500 Page 501 Page 502 Page 503 Page 504 Page 505 Page 506 Page 507 Page 508 Page 509 Page 510 Page 511 Page 512 Page 513 Page 514 Page 515 Page 516 Page 517 Page 518 Page 519 Page 520 Page 521 Page 522 Page 523 Page 524

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

62

OFFICER, BOARD, AND COMMISSION REPORTS

opinion addressing whether divorce disqualifies a man from serving in the Office of the Public Ministry and whether the remarriage
of a divorced man makes him unsuitable for the Office of the Public
Ministry. At its May 2025 meeting, the commission unanimously
approved this opinion and subsequently conveyed it to the boards
for their information and use. The opinion is included in the Workbook appendix.

II. Church Relations
The CTCR has the responsibility to “assist the President of the
Synod at his request in discharging his constitutional responsibilities for maintaining doctrinal integrity as he relates to other church
bodies” (Bylaw 3.9.5.2.2). This includes circumstances in which
a church body officially requests recognition of fellowship by the
Synod. The commission’s approval is required for each such fellowship request. In light of the many changes occurring in worldwide Lutheranism, the Synod has had increasing numbers of fellowship requests in recent years and the CTCR seeks to address
them both efficiently and faithfully. The following shall report on
(A) formal requests for fellowship that have been approved by the
commission or may be approved prior to the convention, and (B)
official theological conversations with various church bodies that
the commission does not believe will eventuate in formal recognition of church fellowship.

A. Requests for Church Fellowship Approved by
the CTCR
1. Evangelical Christian Lutheran Church of Bolivia
(ICEL)
In June 2022, the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Bolivia
(ICEL) formally communicated a request to begin fellowship conversations with the LCMS concerning altar and pulpit fellowship.
After multiple rounds of discussions, including a trip to Bolivia
by Lehenbauer and the Office of the President’s church relations
representatives, the CTCR considered ICEL’s request at its February 2025 meeting. Following the presentation by and discussion
with ICEL president Limberth Fernandez, the CTCR unanimously
approved the request and recommended formal recognition of altar
and pulpit fellowship, pursuant to Bylaw 3.9.5.2.2 (b) (2), and forwarded its recommendation to the Office of the President for declaration and subsequent endorsement by the Synod in convention.
President Harrison declared recognition of fellowship with ICEL
in May 2025. The CTCR has submitted an overture to the 2026
convention urging formal endorsement by the Synod.

2. Lutheran Mission—Australia (LM—A)
When the Lutheran Church of Australia (LCA) moved to change
its constitution to allow for women’s ordination in 2024 (see I A
6 above), a group of confessional Lutherans formed the Lutheran
Mission—Australia (LM—A). Both before and after the LM—A
was officially constituted as a church body, LM—A representatives
engaged in conversations with the LCMS. At its December 2025
meeting, the commission met with LM—A President Matt Anker and unanimously approved recommending church fellowship
according to Bylaw 3.9.5.2.2 (b)(2). That recommendation was
conveyed to the Synod President with the understanding that his
consideration of formal recognition will be delayed until after the
LM—A’s inaugural convention in August 2026. If and when such
recognition is declared by the Synod President, it will come before
the subsequent LCMS convention for endorsement.
2026 Convention Workbook

3. Mission Province in Sweden (MPS)
The Mission Province in Sweden (MPS)—formerly Mission
Province of Sweden and Finland—was formed in 2003 to support the ordination of confessional Lutheran pastors in the liberal Church of Sweden. Representatives of the MPS began meeting
with the LCMS in 2006 and have held several rounds of theological
conversations, expressing an interest in altar and pulpit fellowship
consideration by the LCMS as early as 2009. After multiple conversations in the current triennium involving the Synod President’s
church relations staff and CTCR members and executive staff, the
commission planned to give continued consideration to the MPS’s
request at its May 2026 meeting.

B. Meetings and Discussions with Other Churches
and Groups
Since the inception of the CTCR in 1962, when it absorbed
the responsibilities of the church relations–focused Committee on
Doctrinal Unity and Committee on Finnish Relations (1962 Res.
6-03), the commission has assisted the President of the Synod in
conversations with other church bodies. The CTCR was expressly
designed to aid in “discussions of theological and/or ecclesiastical
relationships with the synods comprising the synodical conference;
sister churches in foreign countries; groups of churches, councils,
federations,” among others (1962 Reports and Memorials, 251).
At the President’s request, the CTCR has been involved in many
official and unofficial theological conversations with a variety of
Christian denominations and organizations over the years. For an
explanation of the role and benefits of such conversations, even
where full altar and pulpit fellowship may not be immediately foreseen, the commission commends its 2011 report, Theological Dialogue with Other Christian Church Bodies.
In the present triennium, CTCR staff and select members have
participated in four such discussions: with the Anglican Church in
North America (in collaboration with the Lutheran Church-Canada), the North American Lutheran Church (in collaboration with
the Lutheran Church-Canada), the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran
Synod and Evangelical Lutheran Synod (jointly), and the Anglican
Catholic Church, the Anglican Church of America, and the Anglican Province of America (jointly). Detailed information on the nature and content of these theological conversations may be found in
the report of the Office of the President on Church Relations.

III. Religious Organizations and Movements
The CTCR is charged with assisting “congregations and ordained and commissioned ministers of religion in fulfilling their
commitment to witness publicly and privately to the one and only
Gospel set forth in the Holy Scriptures” (Bylaw 3.9.5.4 “Fraternal and Other Organizations”). This bylaw includes the Synod’s
longstanding provisions for dealing with lodges as well as other
organizations which have “an unchristian or anti-Christian character.” In providing resources and information to the members of
the Synod regarding such organizations, philosophies, and religious movements, the CTCR website features a section designated
“Evaluations” (see lcms.org/ctcr). Evaluations fall into two general categories: lodge organizations and religious organizations
and movements. The evaluations consider, from a Lutheran theological perspective, a broad range of religious practices, organizations, movements, claims, and individuals—both Christian and
non-Christian. In addition to material previously available, during
the past triennium the commission has provided several new evaluations. New topics addressed include Deepak Chopra, Falun Gong,