Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1929 · 34th Convention, River Forest › Page 187
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1929, Page 187
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1929. . Lo
and fewer notes to meet, and this ought to mean more money
‘ rposes.
eynodica i yespondence likewise shows that the typical congre-
; 2) ses to build as cheaply as possible and that it tries to do this
fon a down on materials rather than upon size and ornament.
by cot ectural committee is able to show methods by which a much
; - pstantial church may be had for the same amount of money,
sor’ he such methods as more compact planning, the elimination of
jeoements where basements are really not needed (a finished basement
umes one-fourth of the entire building fund), the elimination
ora towel (which often consumes another fourth of the entire fund)
‘ Ore a congregation is financially unable to build a tower, the use
° of temporary glass, and even of temporary, but well-designed fur-
“pishings. In this way a church of durable construction may be built
for even less money than a flimsy one, and such things as towers and
permanent stained glass may be added at a later date.
A cheaply constructed church means large outlays for repairs
and depreciation, and if this item were cut down, much money might
be saved, and diverted for synodical purposes, which is not spent
patching up flimsily constructed buildings.
3) Many of our congregations have erected two churches within
the past thirty years and in a few cases even three churches. This
means a perpetual burden of debt, and with the result that synodical
budgets are seldom met. Through a proper educational campaign,
congregations may be taught to build in a more lasting manner, so
that it is not necessary to wreck and replace a church-building so
frequently. An architectural committee is able to show congrega-
tions, methods by which a church can be built with the idea of future
enlargement in mind, and to build lastingly, adding to the church
as more room is needed. The staggering burden of debt, due to fre-
quent tearing down and replacing of buildings, might be substantially
: lessened. ;
4) While nothing can possibly take the place of Word and
Sacraments, yet it is likewise true that a cheap, shabby, forbidding-
looking church-building might prove to be a thing that would not
attract the lukewarm and indifferent. A shabby church is a poor
missionary asset. With proper attention to better construction, this
might be largely remedied.
Report of the Committee.
Your Committee recommends that Synod pass resolutions —
1) Ordering that the report of the Committee on Church Archi-
tecture be embodied in the record of the proceedings of this con-
vention;
2) Thanking the members of the committee for their painstaking
work;
13