Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1929 · 34th Convention, River Forest › Page 131
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1929, Page 131
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1929. 181
V. PUBLICATIONS.
Concordia Publishing House.
Memorial 501, covering pages 149 to 155 of Reports and Memo-
rials contained in the report of the directors of Concordia Publishing
“e The Fiscal Report of Concordia Publishing House as given
t ttt following page was distributed to the delegates at the con-
vention - . . .
On these items Committee 16 brought in the following report: —
The Committee has carefully read the report of the Board of
Directors of Concordia Publishing House, including the Fiscal Re-
port, which has been distributed and which should be inserted oppo-
site page 150 of Reports and Memorials. Your Committee believes
that Synod should commend the Board of Concordia Publishing
House for the large amount of good work done during the triennium.
Action.
The report was adopted.
Revision of Synodical Catechism.
In Memorial 509 the English District called attention to the
desirability of the publication of a revised synodical catechism or an
entirely new exposition of Dr. Martin Luther’s Small Catechism.
Action.
On recommendation of Committee 16 Synod passed the following
resolutions : —
1. Resolved, That Synod instruct its Ven. President to appoint
a committee of eleven which is to make a thorough study of our
Schwan Catechism with a view to its eventual revision as well as the
grading of the catechism material; and be it furthermore
2. Resolved, That the committee ask for, and consider, sugges-
tions with regard to this work and submit its findings, together with
the proposed draft, to all pastors’ and teachers’ conferences and even-
tually to the 35th synodical convention.
| Revision of Hymnal. Appendix to Hymn-Book.
In Memorial 507 the special Committee on the Revision of the
Synodical Hymnal asked that a committee be appointed to prepare
for the publication of a new English hymnal in from ten to fifteen
years. The following reasons were advanced: —
1. Many of the translations from the German are of uncertain
merit and ought to be corrected in the interest of a wider use of the
splendid heritage which has come down to us from our fathers.
2. The selection of material from other fields outside of the Ger-
man chorals is also subject to criticism, since, in many instances, we