LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1929, Page 177

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209

EV Luth, Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1929. 181

e. Miscellaneous.

ong the memorials before this convention there are a number

ting ne" policies and new departments or making other sug-

‘song involving the expenditure of money. The sum of $2,000,000

See ed for Group “A” of the budget will not only provide the funds

Bee ce jtems specifically enumerated in Resolution A, but will also
llowing items if adopted by Synod: —

ommmodate the fo
a) A “Central Department of Missions,” as advocated in Memo-

yial 315.

p) A survey of our colleges, recommended in Memorials 122, 125,

and 126. -
. 1 of Synod’s properties (cf. No. 603, § 9).

c) An appraisa
d) The employment of an auditor (cf. No. 603, § 10).

e) The limited gratis distribution of the proceedings of Synod’s
conventions (ef. No. 505).

f) The limited gratis
(cf. No. 506).

g) Student Welfare Work (cf. No. 303).

h) A “Board of Christian Education” (cf. Nos. 208—9). (Your
this department will not require any more funds
al of the two separate boards

distribution of the Statistical Year-book

Committee believes
than are at present at the dispos

concerned.)
The suggested budget would not cover the cost of —

i) The extension of our college courses, as recommended in Memo-

rials 121, 123, 124, and 128.
j) African Missions (cf. No. 312).

k) Larger appropriations for publicity at our colleges (cf.

No. 130). f. Conclusion.
tee have been such as to con-

The experiences of your Commit
omplished in the future if an

vince it that much good could be ace
Appropriations Committee were made a permanent institution.

were unable to carry out our full commission,
d investigation of the individual requests,” etc.,

a thorough survey an
Ample time for investigation and study

because of lack of time.
would place the committee in a position w
could be made more detailed and circumspect.
should be appointed by the

f .

of Synod Action. .
The report of the Committee on Appropriations was given much

consideration during the first sessions of the convention,

mitted to all delegates in printed form. T

We
namely, “to make

here its recommendations
Such a committee

Board of Directors or the President

being sub-
he whole report was read,