Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1929 · 34th Convention, River Forest › Page 77
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1929, Page 77
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1929. 17
oans throughout the Districts of Synod. The fund has an average
monthly return of over $10,000. Most of the congregations are
meeting their obligations promptly, although there are some that, for
arious reasons, are in arrears. It may be recorded as complimentary
o the management of the General Church Extension Fund that
. during these twenty-seven years, with a turnover of nearly $2,000,000,
©the actual losses have been Jess than $2,000. Very great care is
exercised by the Board in making the loans. The Board assures itself
not only of the need of a building in the place for which it is
‘ requested, but also of the validity of the security. Titles are in-
vestigated carefully, and this procedure has, incidentally, served to
clear up many title flaws for our congregations, preventing much
possible trouble for them in the future. During the year 1928 the
F-General Church Extension Board curtailed its activities in order to
* maintain a large balance for Synod’s treasury. In this way a large
- amount of interest was saved for Synod, inasmuch as Synod could
.. borrow from the General Church Extension Fund instead of
: from banks.
During the years 1926, 1927, and 1928 the additions to the fund
‘ from the Synodical Budget and through bequests amounted to
$257,679.18. The net gain in the fund for these three years was
$275,689.60, and at the beginning of 1929 the books showed a present
worth of $1,165,957.58. The loans made during the three years, 1926,
- 1927, and 1928, totaled $459,807.42. The General Church Extension
Board owes members of Synod who have lent money to the Board
$108,956.20. A large part of this is lent without interest, but on some
of this money low interest rates are paid. The Board lends this bor-
rowed money to congregations that are able to pay interest on a loan.
The interest received from such congregations for the three years was
$4,713.05, and the interest paid out by the Board was $5,545.76. The
Board’s expenses for the three years were $5,715.34.
In 1928 the General Church Extension Board requested the
Fiscal Office of Synod to take charge of the Accounts Receivable in
order to relieve the chairman and the treasurer of a burden that was
becoming too great. The Board of Directors sanctioned the arrange-
ment, and its operation has been very satisfactory.
Regarding this part of the report, the recommendations of Com-
‘mittee No. 8, as adopted by Synod, were as follows: —
“Your Committee feels that Synod should express its delight and
.. profound gratification at the remarkable growth and success of the
general Church Extension Fund during the twenty-seven years of its
existence. Commendation is due the members of this board for their