Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1929 · 34th Convention, River Forest › Page 171
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1929, Page 171
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
172 Proceedings of Thirty-Fourth Regular Convention,
is the obtaining of reports from all solicitors.
that last year about $10,000 was received from
Permanent Support Fund.
In 1926 the Support Conference discussed this Matter at Je
and urged all servants of the Church to contribute, if at al] eth
, Possible
not less than $10 a year toward the Permanent Support Fund. The
following reasons were presented and concurred in: — ©
1) The definite, unmistakable, and
Synod relative to this matter;
2) The law of love, which imposes u
our fellow-workers and their dependents
3) The example of our fathers and of
Synod to this day;
4) The fact that such special contribution does not militate
against the principle that the congregation is to support its Servants;
5) The example of other church organizations;
6) The fact that personal contributions will
‘sonal and practical interest of our entire cler,
support.
Other good reasons could be added.
We would suggest that Synod authorize the Board of Support
to systematize the personal contributions by combining them with
the annuity plan in such a manner —
1) That a record will be kept of all contributions received in
this way from every servant of the Church;
2) That the amount received’ will be increase
interest ;
3) That from the time of his retirement or death the contributor
or his dependents will receive an adequate annuity for life in propor-
tion to the total contribution made. The residuum is to be added to
the Permanent Support Fund.
The working out of the details could be
mittee.
This plan would encourage those brethren who are willing to
comply with Synod’s request, and it would counteract the habit of
putting their savings in unsafe and unprofitable investments.
Respectfully submitted,
Tue Boarp or Support.
It appears, however
this source for the
unrepealed resolutions of
pon us a special duty toward
many of our brethren in
keep alive the per-
d by compound
left to a competent com-
Board of Support Requirements.
The requirement of the Board of Support continues to grow from:
year to year. To-day itis one of the major items in Synod’s budget.
At different times various suggestions have been made leading to
a change in the financing of this board. We believe that this
subject
gy in the cause of .
173
Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1929.
v. .
studied intensively by an independent committee, which
; ider all suggestions that have been made thus far as well
pall cons} ay come to its attention, get such expert advice as it
such * ind report its findings at the next convention of Synod.
may ee ittoe therefore recommends that such a committee be
Tom ated by your President.
apo Respectfully submitted by the
APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE.
ld be
‘Referring to these memorials, Committee 18 submitted the fol-
ey, ee ommittee desires to express its gratification over the fact
+ ihe ‘contributions of our people permitted an increase of 10 per
ane the average allowance to the dependents by the Board of
ont vt go that the present average allowance for married men is
ee per month, for unmarried $35 per month, for widows $28,
for children under 17 $12.
Your board requests Synod to direct them in the regulation of
the average allowance. Your Committee believes that Synod is hardly
in a position to establish a table of allowance, as this will always be
contingent upon the needs of the dependents and the funds available.
We feel, however, that even the present increased allowances are in-
adequate and would strongly urge our congregations to give more
consideration to the Veterans of the Cross.
We agree with the Committee on Appropriations that steps
should be taken toward a change in the financing of the Board of
Se the support of the Veterans of the Cross the Board of Sup-
port has various sources of income. The Lutheran Laymen’s League
Fund has reached a total of $2,642,738.24; the Permanent Support
Fund $109,373.80; cash legacies, not including the Raithel Farm,
; about $44,000. Then there are annuity gifts amounting to $42,362.10.
We heartily commend the Lutheran Laymen’s League for their
continued striving toward the completion of the Endowment Fund.
May they, with the help of God, reach the goal of $3,000,000 at an
early date.
4 Whereas the invested funds of the Board of Support do not
[ provide a sufficient return, we deem it advisable to take a further
step toward making the Board of Support self-supporting and to this
end recommend the following plan to build up the Annuity Fund: —
The Annuity Plan has already been adopted by Synod: The
Board of Support, according to the report, already has made twenty-
three annuity agreements for a total of $42,362.10. Almost half of
this amount it matured and was added to the funds of Synod. ‘The
Board of Support says: “The Annuity Plan deserves all the publicity