Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1929 · 34th Convention, River Forest › Page 170
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1929, Page 170
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
170 Proceedings of Thirty-Fourth Regular ‘Convention
* "Resolved, That Group “B” shall receive su
remain after Group “A” has been taken care of,
that the Districts receive their proportionate ref
Extension contributions as heretofore,’ ”
All recommendations of Committee 17 and these re.
the Fiscal Conference were ratified by Synod.
Finally the whole report of Committee 17 was adopted.
ich amounts ag will
it being undergt,
unds of the Church
Solutions of
Report of the Board of Support.
(Memorial 611.)
The undersigned Board herewith submits to the Ven. Synod it
report for the years 1926, 1927, and 1928,
The Board met regularly for the transaction of such business ag
came before it under the rules and regulations of Synod. In these
three years we granted 236 new requests for support, which were duly
recommended by the respective District boards. This, on the average,
means 79 applications a year. During the same Period 136 applica.
tions were canceled, the most of them on account of the death of the
applicant, the others because the beneficiary became self-supporting.
The net increase of the number of applications in force was 100,
In December, 1925, we mailed 543 checks; in December, 1928,
643 checks. .
The increase of disbursements was in proportion. In 1926 we
remitted $242,669.68; in 1928, $284,283.50. A tabulation showing the
apportionment of this amount to the various Districts is available.
On the first of J anuary, 1927, we increased the average allowance
to our beneficiaries by about 10 per cent. In view of the deficit we
refrained from further increases. It has been our aim to grant to
every applicant an allowance in Proportion to his or her need as set
forth in the application. At present the average allowance for married
men is $55 a month; for unmarried, $35; for widows, $28; for
children under 17, $12. We would suggest that Synod direct us in
the regulation of the average amount to be granted.
Once every year all applications in force were renewed and
carefully readjusted in accordance with the recommendations made
by the District boards.
The Support Conference.
The Support Conference, composed of representatives of all
District boards and the General Board, was recognized by Synod.
It has not met since 1996. We intend to meet immediately before
the coming convention of Synod in order to discuss such subjects as
refer to our work. The District boards have cooperated with us in
a most satisfactory manner. :
Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1929. 1741
Invested Funds.
Our invested funds have made little progress in the last three
"The third million of the Lutheran Laymen’s League Endow-
y Fund is still incomplete, although several thousand dollars were
men
. added every year.
In 1925 the Permanent Support Fund had a balance of $81,167.76.
January 31, 1929, it had increased to $109,373.80.
° The cash legacies, not including the Raithel Farm, total about
000.
ws The income from these funds could be greatly enhanced if Synod
would permit investments in other than Government and munic-
ipal bonds. —
We trust that Synod will give the completion of the Endowment
that attention which it deserves.
Annuity Gifts.
Synod granted the Board of Support the privilege to accept
Annuity Gifts in order to increase the invested funds for the benefit
of the Veteran of the Cross, his widow and his orphans. We trust
that this privilege will not be abrogated or curtailed. We have made
23 annuity agreements for a total of $42,362.10. Almost half of this
amount is matured and was added to the Permanent Fund. The
annuity plan deserves all the publicity it can be given and the hearty
recommendation of all members of Synod.
Memorials.
The praiseworthy and beneficial custom of remembering the dead
by a bequest to the Permanent Support Fund is becoming more
popular with congregations, societies, and individuals. The support
of the invalid, the widow, and the orphan evidently is the most natural
and appropriate purpose to which these gifts could be designated.
We furnish engraved memorial cards gratis.
Personal Contributions.
The practise of our professors, pastors, and teachers of making
a voluntary contribution annually for the cause of support in ad-
dition to their regular gift to Synod’s budget dates back to the very
beginning of Synod. In 1905 Synod adopted a resolution requesting
all pastors’ and teachers’ conferences to elect a solicitor who should
seek to obtain this contribution from all members of his conference.
This resolution was not universally carried out, although Synod cor-
roborated it in almost every succeeding session. Since the creation
of the General Board in 1917 and the first meeting of the Support
Conference in 1918 concerted efforts have been made in all Districts
to carry out Synod’s resolution. One of the difficulties encountered