Collection › Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1954 · 43rd Convention, East Detroit › Page 203

Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1954, Page 203

Scan from Albert Collver's files (LCMS President's Office / CCM)

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

Ev. Luth. Synodical Conference of North America, 1954 903

Review Committee
Reports on Convention “Proceedings”

Nore: The insertion (1) indicates that only one member of a com-
mittee reported.
Proceedings Approved

Missouri Synod
Atlantic District (31st Convention) (1)
California-Nevada District (1952 Convention)
Central District (71st Convention) (1)
English District (27th Convention)
Florida-Georgia District (4th Convention)
Iowa District East (11th Convention)
Iowa District West ‘(11th Convention)
Michigan District (73d Convention)
Minnesota District (48th Convention)
Northern Illinois District (1952 Convention)
Northwest District (36th Convention)
Oklahoma District (20th Convention)
South Dakota District (32d Convention) (1)
South Wisconsin District (26th Convention)
Southeastern District (9th Convention)
Southern. California District (16th Convention)
Southern Illinois District (29th Convention)
Texas District (32d Convention) (1, Other. member of

committee deceased.)

Western District (70th Convention)

Wisconsin Synod
Michigan District (76th Convention)
Pacific Northwest District (18th Convention)
Nebraska District (18th Convention)

Southeastern Wisconsin District (18th Convention)
West Wisconsin District (Convention not specified)

Norwegian Synod Proceedings (35th and 36th Conventions)
Slovak Synod Proceedings (35th Convention)

Proceedings Not Approved in Full
Missouri Synod

The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod, points to the following
facts as pertinent (July 31, 1954):

“a) The essay was not accepted by the Colorado District con-
vention, so there is no need for it to be accepted by the Synodical
Conference.

“b) The essay was not printed in the official Proceedings of
the 22d convention, therefore was not a part of the review which