Collection › Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1954 · 43rd Convention, East Detroit › Page 69
Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1954, Page 69
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Scan from Albert Collver's files (LCMS President's Office / CCM)
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
Ev. Luth. Synodical Confererice of North America, 1954 69
Previous discussions. and dealings suggest: the subject matter
to be treated here. In all of them attention. has been given to
certain chief points of controversy, set forth at the first forum of
discussion, thé Intersynodical Relations Committee of the Synodical
Conference, and recurring constantly in subsequent dealings. When
‘individual synods acted in the matter, they reaffirmed their stand
on these points. Intersynodical committees rendered divided reports
reflecting a basic difference of opinion:on the same points of con-
troversy. The first of these. points can be stated in the form of
the question:
I. Does Scoutism Today Have Objectionable Religious Features?
The Missouri Synod and Slovak Synod members of the Synodi-
cal Conference Committee on Scouting in their report claim:
“Scouting is a secular boys’ organization designed to promote good
citizenship. (That Scoutism advocates a life governed by religious
principles does not make it a religious movement.) Scoutism does
not teach religion. (Scoutism expects the church to add the reli-
gious element, without which the program is incomplete.) ...
Scoutism does not promise spiritual blessings such as forgiveness of
sins, life, and salvation, peace with God, etc., to those who obey
the Scout law.” (Cf. Syn. Conf. Proceedings, 1952, p.146.) These
claims are to lead to the conclusion that Scouting is a harmless
secular organization which the Church can embrace in the interest
of its youth-training program.
Is Scouting Merely a Secular Organization?
While much of Scouting is concerned. with the purely material
and devoted to citizenship training, we are not ready to follow the
claims quoted above to their intended conclusion. The first of these
claims conveys the incorrect impression that the only alternative
to a secular organization is a religious movement. There is a middle
ground between the two. There are secular organizations that have
religious features and seek religious ends, often improper and
false, without ever becoming completely religious. To say that
Scouting is not a religious movement is not identical with proving
that it is a secular organization free of all objectionable religious
features. Furthermore, the lack of reference to “spiritual blessings
such as forgiveness of sins, life, and salvation, peace with God,
etc.,” in the principles of an organization does not in itself mean
that the organization is wholly secular and devoid of all religious
aspects. The existence of religions that deal exclusively with the
things of this life has led to the coining of the untranslatable terms
Diesseitigkeitstheologie, Diesseitigkeitsreligion. And the very claim
that “Scouting expects the churches to add the religious element,
without which the program is incomplete” seems to warrant the
conclusion that in the complete Scouting program there are essen-
_tial religious features.
‘The Religious Features of Scouting
By insisting on the oath or promise: “On my honor I will do
‘my best ...to do my duty to God,” by defining “duty to God” as
regular worship, faithfulness to Almighty God’s Commandments,
gratitude, helping others (cf. Handbook for Boys, Fifth Edition,