Collection › Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1954 · 43rd Convention, East Detroit › Page 72
Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1954, Page 72
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Scan from Albert Collver's files (LCMS President's Office / CCM)
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
72 Proceedings of the Forty-Third Convention,
It speaks of “duty to God,” “faithfulness to His Commandments,”
without any reference to the basic duty, repentance, or to faith,
without which it is impossible to please God. Scouting’s “neutral
position,” whereby “it leaves the question of the motivation for
‘doing their duty to God’ to the churches the boys are affiliated
with” (cf. Another Fraternal Endeavor, p. 85), is a false position,
conflicting with the Bible doctrines of original sin, conversion, and
sanctification. ‘The claim is made that Scouting, when it speaks
of “duty to God,” is merely applying natural knowledge of God’s
Law and promoting civic righteousness. But civic righteousness
and “duty to God,” as Scouting defines it, ought not and cannot
be made synonymous. Civic righteousness lies in the field of earthly
relationships. It is not fulfillment of God’s holy Law. And when
natural knowledge of the Law is applied, it ought to be applied
in the right, God-~intended way — as a mirror to arouse terrors
of conscience, as a curb to limit wickedness, as a guide in fostering
civic righteousness. When Scouting applies it, without any dis-
tinction between the regenerate and unregenerate, as a guide in
doing “duty to God” and keeping His Commandments, then the
satanic lie of self-righteousness is fostered.
“The twelfth Scout law is basically unionistic, since it obligates
every Scout to faithfulness in his religious duties without defining
these duties or the God whom he is to serve, cf. 2 John 9, 10; 2 Cor.
6:14-18.” (Syn. Conf. Proceedings, 1952, p. 147). The twelfth Scout
law reads: “A Scout is reverent. He is faithful in his religious
duties and respects the conviction of others in matters of custom
and religion,” and is interpreted to include prayer, love and service
to God (cf. Handbook for Boys, p. 39). Scouting insists on belief
in God, granting to all beliefs in all “Gods” equal value and
validity. It requires faithfulness in religious duties, implying that
any kind of worship and duty is good and God-pleasing. That
is the obvious intent of the twelfth law. That is the basic assump-
tion on which Scouting’s relationship to the various churches rests,
That is the idea that underlies all unionism. Scouting may leave
“to the parents of the boys and to his church everything that deals
with the application of these goals (i.e., of the twelfth law), their
motivation and carrying out” (Another Fraternal Endeavor, p. 86).
But when it obligates Scouts to faithfulness in religious duties,
whether true or false, and when it says, “Your own spiritual
leader, minister, priest, or rabbi will teach you how to know God
better” (Handbook for Boys, p.25), it is promoting the spirit of
unionism. Without too much of a struggle Scouting has eliminated
the rule obligating Scouts to attend grossly unionistie services,
But it has not yet eliminated the more subtle and, consequently,
the more dangerous unionistic idea inherent in its twelfth law.
This is another objectionable religious feature in the movement
that compels us to take a stand against Scoutism.
Hf. Is the Scout Oath or Promise an Oath Forbidden
by God’s Word?
A religious feature of Scouting that warrants individual treat-
ment is its mandatory oath or promise. The question: “Is the Scout
oath or promise an oath forbidden by God’s Word?” cannot be
answered by the movement itself. Scouting employs two designa-
tive terms, “oath” and “promise,” and is, in any event, incompetent