Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1969 · 48th Convention › Page 283

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1969, Page 283

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Sheet 506 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Sheet 510 Page 475 Page 479 Page 450 Page 481 Sheet 515 Sheet 516 Page 454 Sheet 518 Page 456 Sheet 520 Sheet 521 Sheet 522 Sheet 523 Sheet 524 Sheet 525 Sheet 526 Sheet 527 Sheet 528 Sheet 529 Sheet 530 Sheet 531 Sheet 532 Sheet 533 Sheet 534 Sheet 535 Sheet 536 Sheet 537 Sheet 538 Sheet 539 Sheet 540 Sheet 541 Sheet 542 Sheet 543 Sheet 544 Sheet 545 Sheet 546 Page 516 Sheet 548 Sheet 549 Sheet 550 Sheet 551 Sheet 552 Sheet 553 Sheet 554 Sheet 555 Sheet 556 Sheet 557 Sheet 558 Sheet 559 Sheet 560 Sheet 561 Sheet 562 Sheet 563 Sheet 564 Sheet 565 Sheet 566 Sheet 567 Sheet 568 Sheet 569 Sheet 570 Sheet 571 Sheet 572 Sheet 573 Sheet 574 Page 544 Sheet 576 Sheet 577 Page 1 Sheet 579 Sheet 580 Sheet 581 Sheet 582 Sheet 583 Sheet 584 Sheet 585 Sheet 586

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

HIGHER EDUCATION 283

ratio; however, any diminution of the production of
ministerial graduates inevitably raises the specter of
the type of inestimable damage which comes to the vital
work of a church when it has an inadequate supply of
high-quality ministers available to it.

These enrollment developments make it quite clear
that the current approach to recruitment is not pro-
ducing the desired quantity for the Synod’s ministerial
colleges, since the total new ministerial enrollments
have remained static for most of the past decade, while
teacher-training enrollments, especially of women, have
risen dramatically. In this connection the board desires
to bring to the Synod’s attention the apparent need for
revitalization of the sense of personal responsibility for
recruitment of ministerial students in his own parish
by every pastor and the apparent need for a correspond-
ing deemphasis on the concept of central responsibility
at the District or synodical level for recruitment ac-
tivities, since the promotional approach has not pro-
duced the desired results in ministerial recruitment.

Attention is called also to the progressive and sig-
nificant reduction of the percentage which “students
from the parsonage” constitute in the total enrollment
for ministerial training at Concordia Senior College.
In 1961—62, 19.9 percent of the students came from the
parsonage; in 1967—68 the percentage had dropped to
14.5 percent; and in the current year only 12.2 percent
of the students at the college are sons of pastors. This
steep decline in the short span of 7 years is Ominous,
indeed, in the opinion of this board.

The board calls attention to the statistical develop-
ments cited because they appear so clearly on this
campus where ministerial students converge and be-
cause they obviously carry definitive implications for
the future development of the Synod’s work in the min-
isterial education area and ultimately for every phase
of the Synod’s work.

Continuity in Teaching

Regarded as more serious by this board than the
declining enrollment is the accelerating erosion of the
highly competent faculty which was painstakingly se-
lected and assembled for this particular purpose.

During the biennium more than a score of calls and
offers of appointments have come from inside and from
outside the church to members of the faculty. and these
have resulted in very serious losses involving no fewer
than six professors, all except one with experience in
the parish ministry and all except one holding the doc-
torate in his respective teaching field: Dr. Richard Som-
merfeld to Capital University; Dr. Ralph Klein to the
St. Louis seminary; Dr. William Goerss to an Tllinois
parish: Dr. Warren Rubel to Valparaiso University; Dr.
Norbert Schedler to Purdue University; and Assistant
Professor Carroll Nelson to Indiana University.

In this connection the board desires to bring two
equally significant considerations to the Synod's atten-
tion:

1. Our church needs to thank and praise God for the

commitment which moves the vast majority of faculty
members to continue their dedicated service to the
Synod’s vital ministerial education project, even though
serious inequities continue to characterize remuneration
for this teaching service in the Synod’s accredited col-
leges and seminaries. when the vital nature of their
contribution, the breadth of their experience, and the
extent of their specialized professional preparation in
addition to their theological studies are taken into con-
sideration (e. g.: a faculty member with three children,
with full theological training, with 16 years in the min-
istry, and with all work on the doctorate except the
dissertation completed, serving currently on this campus
at a salary of $550 a month, plus housing).

2. Since faculty competence is the very heart of any
educational enterprise. it is both unrealistic and im-
perceptive to expect anything but ultimate disaster for
its entire ministerial education project — one of the
three primary reasons for forming a Synod in the first
place — if the Synod does not provide immediately for
a more realistic confrontation of what is happening in
the competition for its faculty members, both within the
church and in the educational world of which this as-
pect of churchwork is inevitably a part.

So acute is the situation on this upper-level college
campus, where major competition for retention of min-
isterial college students through the appointment of
well-trained and dedicated college-level teachers is ex-
ceptionally critical, that this board is submitting a formal
overture, calling for immediate action on the alarming
salary situation, which is not the only, but is certainly
one major factor in the operation — and even the sur-
vival — of the critical ministerial education sector of
synodical activity.

The New Curriculum

Concordia Senior College continues to provide sep-
arate and distinct approaches to learning because it has
been assigned distinctive goals by the Synod.

In its fierce concern for providing the church with
the best in ministerial education and in keeping with its
assignment and commitment to provide an education
significant to ministers who will live part of their lives
and give part of their service to God and the church
in the 2st century, it has felt, under the compulsion of
its assignment, the need to develop a character of its
own, to explore special programs, and to seek fresh edu-
cational approaches responsive to the needs and oppor-
tunities of the church in this age. In this connection the
most significant development for the future of the Synod
is the development of the new Concordia Senior College
curriculum, which will be introduced in September 1969.

Without discounting or diminishing those aspects of
counseling, worship, and organized student activity out-
side the classroom, where the program utilizes Word
and sacrament plus the divine and human forces of com-
munity life to make great intellectual, spiritual, ec-
clesiastical, and cultural currents flow around the min-
isterial student and his teachers, this innovative and