Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1969 · 48th Convention › Page 254

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1969, Page 254

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Sheet 506 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Sheet 510 Page 475 Page 479 Page 450 Page 481 Sheet 515 Sheet 516 Page 454 Sheet 518 Page 456 Sheet 520 Sheet 521 Sheet 522 Sheet 523 Sheet 524 Sheet 525 Sheet 526 Sheet 527 Sheet 528 Sheet 529 Sheet 530 Sheet 531 Sheet 532 Sheet 533 Sheet 534 Sheet 535 Sheet 536 Sheet 537 Sheet 538 Sheet 539 Sheet 540 Sheet 541 Sheet 542 Sheet 543 Sheet 544 Sheet 545 Sheet 546 Page 516 Sheet 548 Sheet 549 Sheet 550 Sheet 551 Sheet 552 Sheet 553 Sheet 554 Sheet 555 Sheet 556 Sheet 557 Sheet 558 Sheet 559 Sheet 560 Sheet 561 Sheet 562 Sheet 563 Sheet 564 Sheet 565 Sheet 566 Sheet 567 Sheet 568 Sheet 569 Sheet 570 Sheet 571 Sheet 572 Sheet 573 Sheet 574 Page 544 Sheet 576 Sheet 577 Page 1 Sheet 579 Sheet 580 Sheet 581 Sheet 582 Sheet 583 Sheet 584 Sheet 585 Sheet 586

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

254 HIGHER EDUCATION

Education, the college presidents, and the Commission
on Research and Planning.

Preparing High School Teachers

For example, both River Forest and Seward offer
programs in secondary teacher education for most aca-
demic areas. The number of new teachers required by
the high schools in the Synod for any one academic area
in a given year is very limited. Therefore, consideration
is being given to the feasibility of either offering a secon-
dary program on only one campus or of assigning certain
areas of specialization in secondary programs to indi-
vidual campuses.

Other possibilities which are being studied and dis-
cussed for consolidating existing programs include:
assigning all graduate teacher education offerings to only
one campus; offering all synodical graduate education
at a single center for graduate studies: offering certain
sequences and majors for elementary teacher education
students at one or several select colleges: assigning the
director of Christian education program to one institution.

New programs which are being considered, such as
specialized training for the ministry in the modern cities,
are being analyzed in relation to the feasibility of assign-
ing them to a single campus. The studies of the parish
worker, deaconess, and Lutheran Lay Training Institute
programs, as directed in Resolution 6-27 of the New York
convention, tentatively indicate that more consolidation
of such specialized programs may be possible and
desirable.

Any steps to consolidate or assign programs, of
course, must be done only after careful planning and
study. Arbitrary or provincial decisions would destroy
the potential value of the efforts.

The Board for Higher Education recommends to the
Synod that the studies concerning the consolidation of
programs be continued and that the Board for Higher
Education be given discretionary authority to assign
specialized and graduate programs to institutions to
avoid unnecessary duplication.

3. Seek Increased Amounts and New Sources of
Financial Support

“The Synod is to be commended for the substantial
financial support it has provided, and Lutherans can be
proud of the good use to which their money has been
put.” This quotation from the statement by Dr. Pattillo
expresses the high regard which many leaders in educa-
tion, and especially those in other church-related colleges,
have for the strong financial base which the Synod has
provided through subsidy for the colleges which educate
the future ministers of the church.

At the same time, the colleges and seminaries of the
Synod have not been able to escape the financial erises
and dilemmas which have recently engulfed all private
and church-related educational institutions. The funds
available to our colleges and seminaries in the past bien-
nium have not been sufficient to meet the needs in areas
such as faculty salaries and building maintenance, nor

to meet the challenges in programs such as instructional
innovations and continuing education.

The two major sources of funds for the ongoing opera-
tion of the schools continue to be the fees paid by the stu-
dents and the subsidy from the Synod. During the past
biennium the average annual income from student fees
increased by $98 per student, while synodical subsidy
increased by only $22 per student. The percentage of
the total current income at the colleges and seminaries
which came from synodical subsidy was lower in 1968
than in any other year for which financial records are
available.

Synodical Grants Decline

Synodical grants for capital funds (new buildings and
major remodeling) and plant funds (equipment pur-
chases and minor remodeling) declined sharply during
the past biennium. The actual amount of synodical
money expended during each of the past 2 years for
capital needs was significantly less than one half as
much as the amount spent during each of the earlier
years in this decade. Whereas 85 percent of the total
capital expenditures during the first 7 years of this dec-
ade came from synodical subsidy, only 45 percent of
the amount spent during the past 2 years was provided
by the Synod. Plant funds which were made available
through the Synod averaged $7 per student in 1967 and
$13 in 1968, as compared with an average of $97 per year
per student during the 7 years prior to this biennium.

The financial problems confronting all private and
church-related colleges are extremely serious. Many
educators have expressed the belief that all nonpublic
institutions will eventually close unless much more sup-
port is made available through federal or other public
funds.

How does the financial future look for our own col-
leges? The data available to the Board for Higher Educa-
tion—including the records of the past financial perfor-
mance by the church, the needs and challenges faced
by the Synod as seen by its leaders, the studies and
projections concerning the future of our schools, and the
opinions available from prominent men in the American
educational scene —all indicate that our schools can
move ahead, under God, and will have the funds needed
to do an even more effective job of providing workers
for the church, if rigorous and concerted efforts are made
in at least four areas involving finances.

a. Economy. It will, without a doubt, be essential
that our colleges and seminaries continue to practice
every possible economy without limiting the objectives
of the system. The Board for Higher Education intends
to examine every proposal, adopt every policy, and
implement every plan which shows promise for more
efficient operation without any sacrifice of quality. The
recommendations for consolidation in the system, as
detailed in the preceding section of this report, reflect
some of the plans of the board for fulfilling this objective.

b. Subsidy. In recent years the percentage of the
Synod’s total income which has been spent for higher