Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1969 · 48th Convention › Page 255

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1969, Page 255

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Sheet 506 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Sheet 510 Page 475 Page 479 Page 450 Page 481 Sheet 515 Sheet 516 Page 454 Sheet 518 Page 456 Sheet 520 Sheet 521 Sheet 522 Sheet 523 Sheet 524 Sheet 525 Sheet 526 Sheet 527 Sheet 528 Sheet 529 Sheet 530 Sheet 531 Sheet 532 Sheet 533 Sheet 534 Sheet 535 Sheet 536 Sheet 537 Sheet 538 Sheet 539 Sheet 540 Sheet 541 Sheet 542 Sheet 543 Sheet 544 Sheet 545 Sheet 546 Page 516 Sheet 548 Sheet 549 Sheet 550 Sheet 551 Sheet 552 Sheet 553 Sheet 554 Sheet 555 Sheet 556 Sheet 557 Sheet 558 Sheet 559 Sheet 560 Sheet 561 Sheet 562 Sheet 563 Sheet 564 Sheet 565 Sheet 566 Sheet 567 Sheet 568 Sheet 569 Sheet 570 Sheet 571 Sheet 572 Sheet 573 Sheet 574 Page 544 Sheet 576 Sheet 577 Page 1 Sheet 579 Sheet 580 Sheet 581 Sheet 582 Sheet 583 Sheet 584 Sheet 585 Sheet 586

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

HIGHER EDUCATION 255

education has actually decreased slightly. The potential
damage to ministerial education if this trend is permitted
to continue cannot be overemphasized. The percentage
of the Synod’s income which is made available for higher
education must be increased if the objectives of the
Synod are to be fulfilled.

c. Student Fees and Aid. The average fees paid per
year per student at synodical colleges increased from
$852 to $950 during the past biennium. This amount is
high when compared to the charges at public colleges,
but lower than the cost at most other private institutions.

The student fees at our colleges will, no doubt, need
to be raised even higher in the future to meet the in-
creased costs. However, because the majority of the
students in synodical schools come from homes with
low-middle to middle-level incomes, each increase in
fees makes it necessary for more students to enter the
group which requires financial help. As fees are in-
creased, recruitment will be hampered unless adequate
financial aid for students is made available.

District committees presently furnish about 35 percent
of the total aid given to students. While the amounts of
such aid have been increased regularly, the percentage
of the total income of Districts which is used for student
aid is only one half as large now as in the 1930s. Some
Districts now provide less than 10 cents per communicant
each year for student aid. The Board for Higher Educa-
tion recommends that the Synod ask all District leaders
to reexamine their student aid budgets and make efforts
to increase such aid during the next biennium.

Home congregations of students now provide about
20 percent of the total amount of student aid. Many
parishes responded to the synodical resolution adopted
at the New York convention which encouraged each
congregation to “include aid for its students at synodical
schools in the regular annual congregational budget, or
from its auxiliaries ... and that funds so designated be
made available to the colleges and seminaries for use
in general student aid if no students from the congrega-
tion are enrolled in a given year.” More congregations
are needed which will inaugurate such a program in the
coming biennium.

In recent years the officers of the colleges and sem-
inaries, the students in the system, and the Board for
Higher Education have been successful in their efforts
to locate new sources of student financial aid. Twenty
years ago only 5 percent of the total aid was supplied by
individuals or agencies other than Districts and home
congregations. At present this figure has grown to ap-
proximately 45 percent. Active efforts to increase these
amounts must be continued if the assistance required by
the students is to be provided in the years ahead.

d. Other Sources. Because of inflation in our econ-
omy and the spiraling costs of education, new sources
and increased amounts of support will be needed not
only for student aid but also for all other areas of the
work at the colleges and seminaries.

In 1968, about 18 percent of all funds received by the
schools for current operations came from sources out-

side of synodical subsidy and student fees. This was
3 percent higher than in the year preceding the New
York convention.

For capital projects in 1968, about 65 percent of the
total amount of money spent came from sources other
than synodical subsidy, as compared with 25 percent
in the year preceding the last convention.

The colleges and seminaries will need to continue
and even increase their efforts to locate funds outside
of student fees and synodical subsidy. Non-church-
related foundations and other funds have been providing
increased amounts for our schools. More contacts with
such groups are being planned and made.

Federal Funds

As requested by the Synod at the New York conven-
tion, the schools have submitted “applications to the
federal government . . . for funds from the grant and
loan programs which will make only positive contribu-
tions to the schools in the fulfillment of the synodically
approved objectives for the system.” Federal and state
loans and grants given directly to students also have
been and will be utilized to the extent possible.

Church funds which are not available to the congre-
gations, Districts, or general Synod but which can be
secured by the colleges are being solicited by the schools.

4. Provide Compensation to Administrators and
Faculty Members in Line with Scales in Use at
Comparable Institutions

The problems created by the low faculty salaries in
synodical schools were discussed at the synodical con-
vention in New York in 1967. Two resolutions concerning
salaries were adopted (6-11 and 6-28) which indicated
that the “constituent congregations and Districts be
reminded of their stewardship privilege and responsi-
bility in this matter,” that the salaries be “raised to a
level more nearly approaching the standards of other
American church-related institutions of higher educa-
tion,” that the “Board for Higher Education annually
review faculty salary schedules and grant at least a cost-
of-living raise,” and that the “Board for Higher Educa-
tion and the Board of Directors give salary inprovement
high priority.”

The Board for Higher Education is very sensitive
to the need to implement these convention resolutions.
The Board of Directors has continued to evidence its
concern for adequate salary structures.

However, because of the limited amount of total
synodical funds available for higher education, the in-
creases granted in faculty salaries since the last con-
vention have barely offset the rise in the cost of living.
Little progress has been made in “catching up” for the
previous years when no increases were granted. Faculty
salaries continue to be “below the level received by
many parish pastors and District officials,” as noted in
a New York convention resolution. The average salaries
at other church-related schools have increased more
since 1967 than at the synodical colleges and seminaries.