Collection › The Lutheran Pioneer (St. Louis) › Vol. 49 (1927) › Sheet 69

The Lutheran Pioneer St. Louis — 1927, Sheet 69

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Sheet 34 Sheet 35 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Sheet 39 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Sheet 43 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Sheet 47 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Sheet 51 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Sheet 57 Page 56 Sheet 59 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Sheet 67 Page 66 Sheet 69 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Sheet 75 Page 14 Sheet 77 Page 76 Sheet 79 Page 78 Page 79 Sheet 82 Sheet 83 Sheet 84 Page 83 Sheet 86 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Sheet 92 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Sheet 97 Page 96 Sheet 99 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Sheet 115 Page 114 Sheet 117 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Sheet 126 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Sheet 131 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Sheet 137 Page 136 Sheet 139 Page 138 Page 139 Sheet 142 Sheet 143 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Sheet 147 Sheet 148 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Sheet 154 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Sheet 160 Page 159 Page 160 Sheet 163 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Sheet 173 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Sheet 179 Page 178 Sheet 181 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192

Concordia Seminary Library, St. Louis (scholar.csl.edu/lutheran_pioneer/49)

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

THE LUTHERAN PIONEER.

population is experiencing a rapid growth. The
Southern States, which have always been the rural
stronghold of our nation, saw a rural increase be-
tween 1910 and 1920 of about 1,400,000, but the
population of the cities in these groups of States
increased by nearly 2,300,000 in the same period.
In the Pacific States the urban element already
predominated in 1910, but by 1920 it had increased
proportionately much more than had the rural popu-
lation. In only a single group of States, the Moun-
tain Group, was there a decidedly greater increase
from 1910 to 1920 in the rural class than in the
urban class of population.

The southern part of New England is becoming
one great city. No less than 97.5 per cent. of the
people of Rhode Island are living in cities. In Mas-
sachusetts 95 per cent. of the people are in
cities. In Connecticut only 15 per cent. of
the population live in the country, while the
other 85 per cent. are inhabitants of cities.

A remarkable fact is that the cities of
New England have grown faster during the
last thirty years than did the whole of New
England itself. From 1890 to 1920 the gain
in population of the New England cities was
about 2,725,000, while the increase in the
total population of these States during the
same period was only 2,700,000. The Middle
Atlantic States have an urban population of
17,000,000, which constitutes 75 per cent. of
the total. A noteworthy fact is that the
Negro population of the cities of this group
experienced an increase of almost 44 per cent. be-
tween 1910 and 1920.

The 1920 census brought out the striking fact
that one-fourth of the people of the United States
is living in twenty-five cities having each more than
250,000 inhabitants. One-tenth of all Americans
live in five cities: New York, Chicago, Philadel-
phia, Detroit, and Cleveland. Detroit increased its
population 113.3 per cent. between 1910 and 1920,
the increase of Los Angeles during this period was
80.7 per cent., and that of Cleveland was 42.1 per
cent. in the same decade.

The greatest increase in population in our
country has been in the larger cities. While the
percentage of increase from 1910 to 1920 for the
whole country was 21 per cent. and that of the rural
population was only 11.2 per cent., that of the 229
cities over 25,000 increased 55 per cent. A com-
parison of the increase for these larger cities with
that of the rest of the States in which they are found

67

at times brings startling results. Thus five States
in the South showed more than 50 per cent. in-
crease in the population of cities over 25,000, but
the increase in the portions of the States outside
such cities was only from 4 to 21 per cent.

In 1920 the total number of urban communities
of 2,500 and over was 2,787. Of this number 2,500
had populations ranging from 2,500 to 25,000; 219
had populations numbering 25,000 to 100,000, while
there were 68 cities having over 100,000 inhabitants.

Why This Cityward Tendency?

This tendency has always been noticeable among
men. And history tells us that centuries ago the
growth of cities at the expense of the rural portions
of the state troubled the rulers of various countries.

Trinity Church, New York.
A “Down-town"” Church,

But neither argument nor prohibition has been of
any avail where it has been applied.

The natural increase in the world’s population ~
would have a tendency to cause the cities to grow
with the rural portions of the countries in which
they are found. But there are not a few reasons
why the growth of the cities should exceed that of
the rural communities. Discoveries made in the
field of science and mechanical inventions have
completely revolutionized our industries and have
had a direct tendency to draw men and women
from the countryside to our cities. Machinery has

" put an end to the days of the hand-loom and the

spinning-wheel, as well as to all sorts of handwork,
and has centralized manufacturing in huge fac-
tories, where thousands each do a part of what once
was done by one mechanic, weaver, tailor, or cobbler.
All this, however, could only tend towards develop-
ing, and increasing the growth of, our cities. The
young man of the countryside, hearing of the wages