Collection › Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1950 · 41st Convention, Fort Wayne › Page 133
Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1950, Page 133
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Scan from Albert Collver's files (LCMS President's Office / CCM)
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
Ev. Luth. Synodical Conference of North America. 1950 1338
Peter before them all,” may be necessary in case of a public offense
within the Synodical Conference; a public rebuke, public testi-
mony to the truth of the Gospel, a public disavowal.
See also Acts 15: 23-25. “And they wrote letters by them after
this manner; the Apostles and elders and brethren send greeting
unto the brethren which are of the Gentiles in Antioch and Syria
and Cilicia; forasmuch as we have heard that certain which went
out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls,
saying, Ye must be circumcised and keep the Law; to whom we
gave no such commandment; it seemed good unto us, being as-
sembled with one accord, to send chosen men unto you with our
beloved Barnabas and Paul.”
4. Re ASSOCIATION OF LUTHERAN SEMINARIANS
The.matter of the participation of Synodical Conference semi-
naries in the Association of Lutheran Seminarians was discussed
at great length by your Committee. The Committee takes excep-
tion to such membership. However, it was recognized that since
membership in this Association is the direct concern of the Synod
involved, the matter must be dealt with by that respective synod-
ical body. Respectfully submitted,
J. H. Mever, Chairman
C. M. Gutiervup, Secretary
REPORT OF FLOOR COMMITTEE
(Committee: Prof. E. E, Kowalke, Pastors John Bajus, Theo. E.
Dorpat, Wm. T. Eggers, A. Halboth, H. W. Romoser, E. Unseth,
E. H. Wildgrube.) ;
A
Re Report of the Synodical Committee on Intersynodical Relations
1. Interim Committee Arrangements
Wuereas, the Committee on Intersynodical Relations reports
that the constituent synods have found the arrangement for selec-
tion of personnel of the Interim Committee (Proceedings, 1946,
“p. 61£.; 1948, p. 144) acceptable; and
WHEREAS, it is recognized that interested persons may wish to
make representations to the Interim Committee from time to time;
therefore be it
Resolved, That the Interim Committee as constituted continue
its work; and be it further
Resolved, That the Interim Committee be asked to publish be-
times the date and place of its meetings, making it possible for in-
terested parties to attend and present their views.
Action by the convention: Actiop was deferred until the Interim
Committee had submitted its report (see Proceedings, pp. 125—127,
Report of the Floor Cgmmittee on the Interim Committee Report).
2. Re Unionism
Wuereas, The Committee on Intersynodical Relations reports |
(Proceedings, p.128) that the representatives of the constituent
synods have not reached agreement on the validity of a distinction
between “prayer fellowship” and “joint prayer”; therefore be it