Collection › Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1950 · 41st Convention, Fort Wayne › Page 81
Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1950, Page 81
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Scan from Albert Collver's files (LCMS President's Office / CCM)
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
Ev. Luth. Synodical Conference of North America. 1950 81
At its 1949 convention the Central District again gave rather
detailed attention to the work among the Negroes in its area. The
following resolution was adopted: “Thanking God for the blessings
bestowed on our Negro brethren in the Central District and be-
seeching Him to make them a continuing blessing to many‘ others,
we recommend that the policy regarding the Central District Negro
Missions, adopted at the 1948 convention, remain as it is. Since
these congregations are still receiving subsidies from the Synodical
Conference, we recommend that the Mission Board make definite
plans to assume these subsidies at the next convention, in order
that this phase of our work may be carried on more efficiently and
effectively.” (Central District Proceedings, 1949, pages 51—52.)
As a result of this action the District Mission Board will’
undoubtedly plan to extend subsidies to all Negro congregations
within the District who are not as yet self-supporting, if the 1951
District convention will agree to increase its annual budget by
approximately $20,000.
The relationship between the Missionary Board and the Central
District Mission Board — particularly between the executive secre-
taries of the respective boards — has been extremely cordial.
Co-operation has been the aim of both groups, who are well aware
that the present arrangement (supervision by one Board and finan-
cial support by another Board) is apt to be cumbersome and delay
the speedy action which may be desirable occasionally.
It is regretted by the writer that his preoccupation with synod-
ical matters during the past years (with the knowledge and consent
of the Central District Mission Board) made impossible the close
and frequent supervision that would probably have obtained under
more normal conditions. It is also a matter of regret that appeals
to extend our work (e.g., into Columbus, Ohio, and into another
section of Greater Cleveland) could not be heeded because of the
’ lack of funds in the treasuries of the Church.
At the present time there are nine centers of activity for Negro
mission work in the Central District. We shall merely list them
alphabetically. The comments on the various areas, which follow
the listing, have been compiled by the men serving the missions,
and we are quoting them practically verbatim.
City : Mission Pastor
1. Cincinnati, Ohio Immanuel W. Fehrmann
2. Cleveland, Ohio St. Philip L, Robinson
3. Evansville * Grace L. Charles
4, Fort Wayne{ Neighborhood W. Hofius
Luth, Mission
5, Gary, Ind. Good Shepherd E. Robinson
' 6. Indianapolis, Ind. Our Savior F., Falkenroth
7. Louisville, Ky. St. James Vacant
8. Toledo, Ohio St. Philip H. Pranschke
9. Youngstown, Ohio Peace R. King
* Self-supporting t¢ Subsidized by local Mission Federation
Immanuel, Cincinnati, Ohio
The Rev. W. Fehrmann, Pastor
Immanuel Lutheran Church was begun in the year 1922 by
the Rev. Geo. H. Kase, city missionary, who was introduced to
a Lutheran lady from the South by the Rev. Peay attending Synod-