Collection › Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1950 · 41st Convention, Fort Wayne › Page 81

Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1950, Page 81

Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143

Scan from Albert Collver's files (LCMS President's Office / CCM)

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

Ev. Luth. Synodical Conference of North America. 1950 81

At its 1949 convention the Central District again gave rather
detailed attention to the work among the Negroes in its area. The
following resolution was adopted: “Thanking God for the blessings
bestowed on our Negro brethren in the Central District and be-
seeching Him to make them a continuing blessing to many‘ others,
we recommend that the policy regarding the Central District Negro
Missions, adopted at the 1948 convention, remain as it is. Since
these congregations are still receiving subsidies from the Synodical
Conference, we recommend that the Mission Board make definite
plans to assume these subsidies at the next convention, in order
that this phase of our work may be carried on more efficiently and

effectively.” (Central District Proceedings, 1949, pages 51—52.)

As a result of this action the District Mission Board will’
undoubtedly plan to extend subsidies to all Negro congregations
within the District who are not as yet self-supporting, if the 1951
District convention will agree to increase its annual budget by
approximately $20,000.

The relationship between the Missionary Board and the Central
District Mission Board — particularly between the executive secre-
taries of the respective boards — has been extremely cordial.
Co-operation has been the aim of both groups, who are well aware
that the present arrangement (supervision by one Board and finan-
cial support by another Board) is apt to be cumbersome and delay
the speedy action which may be desirable occasionally.

It is regretted by the writer that his preoccupation with synod-
ical matters during the past years (with the knowledge and consent
of the Central District Mission Board) made impossible the close
and frequent supervision that would probably have obtained under
more normal conditions. It is also a matter of regret that appeals
to extend our work (e.g., into Columbus, Ohio, and into another
section of Greater Cleveland) could not be heeded because of the

’ lack of funds in the treasuries of the Church.

At the present time there are nine centers of activity for Negro
mission work in the Central District. We shall merely list them
alphabetically. The comments on the various areas, which follow
the listing, have been compiled by the men serving the missions,
and we are quoting them practically verbatim.

City : Mission Pastor
1. Cincinnati, Ohio Immanuel W. Fehrmann
2. Cleveland, Ohio St. Philip L, Robinson
3. Evansville * Grace L. Charles
4, Fort Wayne{ Neighborhood W. Hofius
Luth, Mission

5, Gary, Ind. Good Shepherd E. Robinson

' 6. Indianapolis, Ind. Our Savior F., Falkenroth
7. Louisville, Ky. St. James Vacant
8. Toledo, Ohio St. Philip H. Pranschke
9. Youngstown, Ohio Peace R. King

* Self-supporting t¢ Subsidized by local Mission Federation

Immanuel, Cincinnati, Ohio
The Rev. W. Fehrmann, Pastor

Immanuel Lutheran Church was begun in the year 1922 by
the Rev. Geo. H. Kase, city missionary, who was introduced to
a Lutheran lady from the South by the Rev. Peay attending Synod-