Collection › Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1950 · 41st Convention, Fort Wayne › Page 127
Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1950, Page 127
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Scan from Albert Collver's files (LCMS President's Office / CCM)
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
Ev. Luth. Synodical Conference of North America. 1950 127
progress has been made and that the committee, to quote its own
statement, “is not deadlocked on any issue” and that it is nearer the
goal than two years ago. -
We therefore wholeheartedly recommend that the Interim
Committee be urged to continue its work and complete its assign-
ment,
We recommend further that the Interim Committee-be asked to
publish betimes the date and place of its meetings, making it pos-
sible for interested parties to attend and present their views.
Finally, we recommend that individuals, conferences, and other
groups within the constituent synods be urged to continue a study
of the doctrine of the Church and related teachings during the next
biennium, “that the ultimate goal of complete agreement on the
vital doctrine of the Church, with its many practical implications,
be attained.”
Action by the convention: The convention adopted the com-
mittee’s report with its recommendations.
| Report of the Synodical Conference Committee
on Intersynodical Relations
The Committee on Intersynodical Relations held sessions during
the past biennium on the following dates: October 5 and 6, 1948;
February 10 and 11, 1949; September 15 and 16, 1949; February 8
and 9, 1950; May 24 and 25, 1950. At these sessions many matters
pertaining to the relations of one synod to the other were discussed.
The personnel of the Committee for the biennium was as follows:
Of the Missouri Synod: President J. W. Behnken, D.D., Vice-
President H. Harms, D.D., and Pastor J. EH. Meyer, chairman.
Of the Wisconsin Synod: President J. Brenner, Vice-President
A. Voss, and Prof. E. Reim.
Of the Slovak Church: President A. Daniel (later Vice-
President John Bajus, representing the new President, Paul Rafaj),
Pastor J. S. Bradac, D. D., and Pastor S. G. Mazak.
Of the Norwegian Synod: President A. M. Harstad, Prof. N. A.
Madson, D.D., and Pastor C. M. Gullerud, secretary.
This committee presents the following report to the Honorable
Ev. Lutheran Synodical Conference of North America in convention
assembled at Fort Wayne, Ind., August 8—11, 1950:
1. Re A DECLARATION OF: THE WISCONSIN SYNOD’S
STANDING COMMITTEE ON CHURCH UNION
The 1948 Convention of the Synodical Conference referred
a declaration of the Wisconsin Synod’s Standing Committee on
Church Union to the Intersynodical Relations Committee with
power to act. Said declaration reads as follows:
“In view of the position into which our Wisconsin Synod has
been placed by the surprisingly speedy acceptance of the resolu-
tions pertaining to the report of the so-called Interim Committee,
particularly also by the subsequent refusal of the convention to
reconsider these resolutions; and