Collection › Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1950 · 41st Convention, Fort Wayne › Page 62

Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1950, Page 62

Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143

Scan from Albert Collver's files (LCMS President's Office / CCM)

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

62 Proceedings of the Forty-First Convention,

THE SOUTHEASTERN DISTRICT

By the Rev. William von Spreckelsen, Executive Secretary
Missions and Church Extension

The past biennium has seen progress in the transition whereby
the congregations formerly associated with Immanuel Lutheran
Conference have come under the supervision of the Board for
Missions and Church Extension of the Southeastern District of The
Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod.

Most of the pastors of the Conference living in this area have
applied for and received releases from the Missionary Board and
have been received into the Southeastern District with advisory
status. As yet the congregations have not made application for
membership. That will be considered at a future date when mature
and reasonable judgment deems the time and move to be advan-
tageous and to the glory of God.

The writer is but newly inducted into this office, but a limited
study and survey of the field made with Executive Secretary Karl
Kurth during March, 1950, has indicated the following:

A. There is a woeful lack of manpower, which can only be
supplied through Immanuel Lutheran College or some similar
seminary program. An indigenous Church will be the strongest
Church. This can be achieved with God’s blessing by the staffing
of the parishes with trained workers of vision and consecration.
There are fields that are being served on a part-time basis, which
is detrimental to both congregations in the relationship, for example,
Atlanta, Ga., and Spartanburg, S. C.

B. There must be more adequate appropriations of funds to
bring the workers above mere subsistence levels and to level off
present inequities in compensation. The Board for Missions and
Church Extension of the Southeastern District of The Lutheran
Church — Missouri Synod is considering a long-range program
whereby the Negro missionaries can be raised in salary scale to
a basic salary comparable to that received by the white workers.
But as long as the aforesaid District is a heavily subsidized District,
the only way in which the present inequities can be removed and
hardship cases alleviated: will be through more generous appro-
priations from the mission budget of the Synodical Conference.

C. Church Extension funds are sorely needed. In metropolitan
centers mission churches are definitely handicapped by inadequate
facilities. There are no means available to develop a community
program which appears to be necessary to interest prospects, nor
are there Sunday school and fellowship facilities at hand. These
are important to Negro congregations because social contacts are
necessarily restricted to church life and the development of these
church-related social contacts should be encouraged. At present
these congregations have a facility the maximum usefulness of
which is the minimum essential to worship.

As we read the accounts of the former Superintendent William
H. Gehrke (cf. Proceedings, 40th Convention, 1948, pp. 88—94),
without any desire to appear critical, one cannot but wonder why
so many years of endeavor have added so little to the Kingdom?
In fact, there seems to be retrogression, noted principally in the
closing of schools, rather than progress. In this field we are toiling
in that portion of the vineyard where the Negro population ranges