Collection › Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1950 · 41st Convention, Fort Wayne › Page 62
Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1950, Page 62
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Scan from Albert Collver's files (LCMS President's Office / CCM)
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
62 Proceedings of the Forty-First Convention,
THE SOUTHEASTERN DISTRICT
By the Rev. William von Spreckelsen, Executive Secretary
Missions and Church Extension
The past biennium has seen progress in the transition whereby
the congregations formerly associated with Immanuel Lutheran
Conference have come under the supervision of the Board for
Missions and Church Extension of the Southeastern District of The
Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod.
Most of the pastors of the Conference living in this area have
applied for and received releases from the Missionary Board and
have been received into the Southeastern District with advisory
status. As yet the congregations have not made application for
membership. That will be considered at a future date when mature
and reasonable judgment deems the time and move to be advan-
tageous and to the glory of God.
The writer is but newly inducted into this office, but a limited
study and survey of the field made with Executive Secretary Karl
Kurth during March, 1950, has indicated the following:
A. There is a woeful lack of manpower, which can only be
supplied through Immanuel Lutheran College or some similar
seminary program. An indigenous Church will be the strongest
Church. This can be achieved with God’s blessing by the staffing
of the parishes with trained workers of vision and consecration.
There are fields that are being served on a part-time basis, which
is detrimental to both congregations in the relationship, for example,
Atlanta, Ga., and Spartanburg, S. C.
B. There must be more adequate appropriations of funds to
bring the workers above mere subsistence levels and to level off
present inequities in compensation. The Board for Missions and
Church Extension of the Southeastern District of The Lutheran
Church — Missouri Synod is considering a long-range program
whereby the Negro missionaries can be raised in salary scale to
a basic salary comparable to that received by the white workers.
But as long as the aforesaid District is a heavily subsidized District,
the only way in which the present inequities can be removed and
hardship cases alleviated: will be through more generous appro-
priations from the mission budget of the Synodical Conference.
C. Church Extension funds are sorely needed. In metropolitan
centers mission churches are definitely handicapped by inadequate
facilities. There are no means available to develop a community
program which appears to be necessary to interest prospects, nor
are there Sunday school and fellowship facilities at hand. These
are important to Negro congregations because social contacts are
necessarily restricted to church life and the development of these
church-related social contacts should be encouraged. At present
these congregations have a facility the maximum usefulness of
which is the minimum essential to worship.
As we read the accounts of the former Superintendent William
H. Gehrke (cf. Proceedings, 40th Convention, 1948, pp. 88—94),
without any desire to appear critical, one cannot but wonder why
so many years of endeavor have added so little to the Kingdom?
In fact, there seems to be retrogression, noted principally in the
closing of schools, rather than progress. In this field we are toiling
in that portion of the vineyard where the Negro population ranges