Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1965 · 46th Convention › Page 287
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1965, Page 287
front matter 1
front matter 2
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
ER ES EL ESE ARIE EAN SEEN SLE EAE A AS HE MEPIS SI IESE EISNER Eve He
was set forth in THEOLOGY oF FELLOWSHIP, Part II, from
writings of St. Augustine, of Luther, and from the
Preface to The Book of Concord.
Titus 3:10, 11
A man that is an heretick after the first and second
admonition reject;
Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sin-
neth, being condemned of himself.
The term rendered “heretick” by the King James
Version is translated in the RSV as “a man that is
factious,” that is, a man who creates factions or divisions.
This rendering is in accord with the original mean-
ing of the term. Whether he makes factions by means
of false doctrine, as is usually the case, or whether he
divides the church by other means, does not alter the
church’s duty with respect to him. A man who seeks
to divide the church is to be admonished once or twice,
and then avoided. For it is evident that, if the church
successfully avoids a man who would divide it, he
cannot accomplish his aim.
The heretic or factious man, who will not yield to
admonition, is judged to be a self-condemned man.
On this passage Luther says:
Heretics do not merely err, but refuse to be instructed,
defend their error as being right, and fight against the
truth, which they know, and against their own con-
science. Concerning such St. Paul says (Titus 3:11, 12):
You are to avoid a heretic, when he has been admon-
ished once or twice, and you are to know that such a
man is perverted, and sins autocatacritos, that is,
intentionally, and against better knowledge, and wants
to remain in his error.1°
It should be obvious that Titus 3:10 should be ap-
plied, not to erring Christians, who can be corrected,
but to stubborn errorists who refuse to be instructed.
2 Cor. 6:14-18
Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers,
for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteous-
ness? and what communion hath Hght with darkness?
And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what
part hath he that believeth with an infidel?
And what agreement hath the temple of God with
idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God
hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and
I will be their God, and they shall be my people.
Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye
separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing;
and I will receive you,
And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my
sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.
In this passage, addressed to the Christians who
lived in the heathen environment of Corinth, where
both the Christian faith and Christian morality were
constantly in danger, Paul warns, “Be not unequally
yoked together with unbelievers.”
It is clear that the people against whom the apostle
warns are not erring Christians, but the unbelievers
by whom they were surrounded. It is not crystal clear
precisely what the apostle meant by “being unequally
yoked together.” The Greek word, “heterozygountes,”
is found only here in the New Testament, and only
once in the Greek translation of the Old Testament,
the Septuagint, where it is used to translate the word
rendered in the King James Version as “gender with
THEOLOGY OF FELLOWSHIP 287
a diverse kind” (Lev.19:19). It has often, and with
reason, been understood as forbidding Christians to
marry unbelievers.
In the Lutheran Church the passage has been re-
ferred in a wider sense to fellowship. At the time of
the Reformation Luther used it to warn against having
anything to do with the Roman Catholic mass, which
he considered idolatrous. The passage is applied a num-
ber of times against the Roman Catholic Church in the
Lutheran Confessions.}?
Our Confessions do not use the passage against the
Reformed, nor against erring Lutherans. Later the pas-
sage was used by Lutherans against Reformed teachers,
whom they considered stubborn heretics. Finally, in
the history of the Lutheran Church in this country,
some Lutherans, also in our own Synod, used the pas-
sage to forbid fellowship with other Lutherans who
were considered to be in error.
It is evident that those who use the passage in this
way have gone beyond the clear words of the text,
which forbids being “unequally yoked together with
unbelievers.”
Summary Statement
Concerning all these passages it is clear that they
were originally spoken or written for specific situations
and apply first of all to these specific situations.
It is, however, equally true that, like all Scripture
these passages too were written for our learning (Rom.
15:4), and the church must, until the end of time, study
also these passages and draw from them light and in-
struction for her life in fellowship. She will use them
properly when she is taught by them to avoid men who,
either by false teaching or separatistic, schismatic, fac-
tious activities attack the Gospel and the faith of Chris-
tians. She will be misusing these passages if she uses
them to hinder the church’s ongoing attempts to heal
the schisms in the church and to foster the unity of the
Spirit in the bond of peace.
B. UNIONISM AND SEPARATISM
In the discussions of the question of church fellow-
ship among Lutherans two terms are frequently used,
unionism and separatism. Neither word has been de-
fined either uniformly or in a manner acceptable to all.
This lack of clearcut definitions has been a serious
hindrance to profitable discussions and mutual under-
standing.
In the following we attempt to clarify these two
concepts in a manner that is consonant with the teach-
ings of Scripture and of the Lutheran Confessions.
1. Unionism
The terms unionism and unionist as ecclesiastical
terms came into use in connection with the efforts of
King Friedrich Wilhelm III of Prussia to effect a union
of the Lutheran and of the Reformed churches in his
realm in 1817, the tercentenary of the Reformation. The
union was to be effected by declaring the doctrines
which divided the two confessions to be differences in
nonessentials.