Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1965 · 46th Convention › Page 287

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1965, Page 287

front matter 1 front matter 2 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

ER ES EL ESE ARIE EAN SEEN SLE EAE A AS HE MEPIS SI IESE EISNER Eve He

was set forth in THEOLOGY oF FELLOWSHIP, Part II, from
writings of St. Augustine, of Luther, and from the
Preface to The Book of Concord.

Titus 3:10, 11

A man that is an heretick after the first and second
admonition reject;

Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sin-
neth, being condemned of himself.

The term rendered “heretick” by the King James
Version is translated in the RSV as “a man that is
factious,” that is, a man who creates factions or divisions.

This rendering is in accord with the original mean-
ing of the term. Whether he makes factions by means
of false doctrine, as is usually the case, or whether he
divides the church by other means, does not alter the
church’s duty with respect to him. A man who seeks
to divide the church is to be admonished once or twice,
and then avoided. For it is evident that, if the church
successfully avoids a man who would divide it, he
cannot accomplish his aim.

The heretic or factious man, who will not yield to
admonition, is judged to be a self-condemned man.

On this passage Luther says:

Heretics do not merely err, but refuse to be instructed,
defend their error as being right, and fight against the
truth, which they know, and against their own con-
science. Concerning such St. Paul says (Titus 3:11, 12):
You are to avoid a heretic, when he has been admon-
ished once or twice, and you are to know that such a
man is perverted, and sins autocatacritos, that is,
intentionally, and against better knowledge, and wants
to remain in his error.1°

It should be obvious that Titus 3:10 should be ap-
plied, not to erring Christians, who can be corrected,
but to stubborn errorists who refuse to be instructed.

2 Cor. 6:14-18

Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers,
for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteous-
ness? and what communion hath Hght with darkness?

And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what
part hath he that believeth with an infidel?

And what agreement hath the temple of God with
idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God
hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and
I will be their God, and they shall be my people.

Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye
separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing;
and I will receive you,

And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my
sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.

In this passage, addressed to the Christians who
lived in the heathen environment of Corinth, where
both the Christian faith and Christian morality were
constantly in danger, Paul warns, “Be not unequally
yoked together with unbelievers.”

It is clear that the people against whom the apostle
warns are not erring Christians, but the unbelievers
by whom they were surrounded. It is not crystal clear
precisely what the apostle meant by “being unequally
yoked together.” The Greek word, “heterozygountes,”
is found only here in the New Testament, and only
once in the Greek translation of the Old Testament,
the Septuagint, where it is used to translate the word
rendered in the King James Version as “gender with

THEOLOGY OF FELLOWSHIP 287

a diverse kind” (Lev.19:19). It has often, and with
reason, been understood as forbidding Christians to
marry unbelievers.

In the Lutheran Church the passage has been re-
ferred in a wider sense to fellowship. At the time of
the Reformation Luther used it to warn against having
anything to do with the Roman Catholic mass, which
he considered idolatrous. The passage is applied a num-
ber of times against the Roman Catholic Church in the
Lutheran Confessions.}?

Our Confessions do not use the passage against the
Reformed, nor against erring Lutherans. Later the pas-
sage was used by Lutherans against Reformed teachers,
whom they considered stubborn heretics. Finally, in
the history of the Lutheran Church in this country,
some Lutherans, also in our own Synod, used the pas-
sage to forbid fellowship with other Lutherans who
were considered to be in error.

It is evident that those who use the passage in this
way have gone beyond the clear words of the text,
which forbids being “unequally yoked together with
unbelievers.”

Summary Statement

Concerning all these passages it is clear that they
were originally spoken or written for specific situations
and apply first of all to these specific situations.

It is, however, equally true that, like all Scripture
these passages too were written for our learning (Rom.
15:4), and the church must, until the end of time, study
also these passages and draw from them light and in-
struction for her life in fellowship. She will use them
properly when she is taught by them to avoid men who,
either by false teaching or separatistic, schismatic, fac-
tious activities attack the Gospel and the faith of Chris-
tians. She will be misusing these passages if she uses
them to hinder the church’s ongoing attempts to heal
the schisms in the church and to foster the unity of the
Spirit in the bond of peace.

B. UNIONISM AND SEPARATISM

In the discussions of the question of church fellow-
ship among Lutherans two terms are frequently used,
unionism and separatism. Neither word has been de-
fined either uniformly or in a manner acceptable to all.
This lack of clearcut definitions has been a serious
hindrance to profitable discussions and mutual under-
standing.

In the following we attempt to clarify these two
concepts in a manner that is consonant with the teach-
ings of Scripture and of the Lutheran Confessions.

1. Unionism

The terms unionism and unionist as ecclesiastical
terms came into use in connection with the efforts of
King Friedrich Wilhelm III of Prussia to effect a union
of the Lutheran and of the Reformed churches in his
realm in 1817, the tercentenary of the Reformation. The
union was to be effected by declaring the doctrines
which divided the two confessions to be differences in
nonessentials.