Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1965 · 46th Convention › Page 102
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1965, Page 102
front matter 1
front matter 2
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
102 RESOLUTIONS — COMMITTEE 2
ing a doctrine. Among these considerations and con-
‘clusions are the following key statements:
1. “The Scripture, as the only source and norm of
doctrine, is clear; therefore the statement in the memo-
‘rial [338], ‘There must be clear passages if there is
doctrine,’ is correct.”
2. “The expression: “This is a purely exegetical
‘question,’ may be used only when differing interpreta-
tions of a passage are possible which are not in conflict
with the teaching of other passages of Scripture.
3. “That Synod recognizes that there may be legiti-
‘mate differences of opinion in purely exegetical mat-
ters (cf. Paragraph 48 of Brief Statement), but that
‘this liberty does not extend farther and that no inter-
pretation may be held which is contrary to the analogy
of faith” (Proceedings, 1950, quoted in CTCR Report,
CW, p. 40; see also footnote: “... that ‘farther’ means
‘purely exegetical matters, such as grammar, meaning
of words, ete.’”); and be it further
Resolved, That the Synod strongly urge the mem-
bers of the Synod to follow these guidelines in their
interpretation and use of Holy Scripture and avoid
approaching a passage or text with any assumption
or theory which is not found in the text itself or con-
tradicts any clear passage of Scripture or the analogy
of faith.
Action: This resolution was adopted.
Recommendation of the Commission on
Theology and Church Relations Regarding
“Revision of the Study Document on
Revelation, Inspiration, and Inerrancy”
and Its Study on Hermeneutics
RESOLUTION 2-31
Reports 2-01 (CW, pp. 35, 36); 3-45: Supplement...
(separate printing, p. 34)
Wnuereas, The Commission on Theology and Church
Relations has completed a “Revision of the Study
Document on Revelation, Inspiration, and Inerrancy,”
dealing with inspiration and inerrancy, “to indicate
the limits within which and the lines along which our
common study of these issues should move and so give
stimulus and direction to a concerted investigation of
the problems on the part of all members of our Synod”
(original “Study Document,” p.2); and
Wuereas, The commission has recommended “that
a thorough study of ‘revelation’ be included in the
comprehensive hermeneutical study which the commis-
sion is recommending to the Synod” (Supplement,
p. 34); therefore be it
Resolved, That the Synod —
1) commend the Commission on Theology and
Church Relations for presenting the “Revision of the
Study Document on Revelation, Inspiration, and In-
errancy”; and
2) encourage the synodical constituency —
a) to study and evaluate this statement on in-
spiration and inerrancy; and
b) to present any reactions and criticisms of this
revision to the Commission on Theology and
Church Relations; and be it further
Resolved, That the Commission on Theology and
Church Relations complete its study of revelation, in-
spiration, and inerrancy in connection with its compre-
hensive study on hermeneutics for submission to a later !
convention of the Synod.
Action: This resolution was adopted.
To Increase Appropriation for Studies
in Regard to Creation
RESOLUTION 2-32
Overture 2-17 (CW, p. 64)
Resolved, That the concerns expressed in Overture
2-17 be referred to the Committee for Research of the
Commission on Church Literature (CW, pp. 364, 365)
for study and possible action.
Action: This resolution was adopted.
False Doctrine Must Be Acknowledged
and Retracted
RESOLUTION 2-33
Overture 2-45 Un (3) (URO, p.5)
Wuereas, Dr. Martin Scharlemann has withdrawn
the first three documents quoted; and
Wuereas, The presentation “The Pauline View of
Man” was, according to Dr. Scharlemann, delivered
from an outline, and we have received no documenta-~-
tion; therefore be it
Resolved, That this part of Overture 2-45 be. re-
spectfully declined.
Action: This resolution was adopted.
Re Publication “What Is Troubling
the Lutherans?”
RESOLUTION 2-34
Overture 2-45 Un (2) (URO, p.5)
Wuereas, “What Is Troubling the Lutherans?” is
published by the Church League of America and does
not represent the Synod; and
Wuereas, The concerns expressed in this publication
could be and to a large extent have been presented in
overtures directly addressed to the Synod’s convention;
therefore be it
Resolved, That we respectfully decline this part of
Overture 2-45 Un.
Action: This resolution was adopted.