Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1965 · 46th Convention › Page 11
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1965, Page 11
front matter 1
front matter 2
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
i
PRESIDENT’S TRIENNIAL REPORT
In compliance with stipulations in the Handbook of
The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod (2.29 c) I here-
with present to the Synod the official report of the Presi-
dent. This report covers the period since the last con-
vention in 1962.
At the outset I want to express my deep gratitude to
our heavenly Father for the opportunity given me to
serve Him in this special capacity. I assure you these
have been very significant years in my life. The mem-
bers of the Synod cannot realize how completely and
constantly dependent I have been on the grace of God.
The members of the Synod should also hear my testi-
mony that God has sustained me, even in difficult cir-
cumstances, and it is His blessing that brought about
any favorable results.
This is the appropriate occasion to express my deep
gratitude for the services rendered to me personally, to
the office of the President, and to the Synod by numer-
ous servants of the church. I mention particularly the
Vice-Presidents of the Synod, Doctors Roland P. Wie-
deraenders, Theodore F. Nickel, George W. Wittmer,
and Arthur C. Nitz. Dr. Walter F. Wolbrecht, Executive
Director, should be commended publicly for his impor-
tant contributions. After more than a half century of
active service, Dr. John W. Behnken has continued to
accept official and unofficial invitations for his unique
and tireless help.
I am indebted to the boards and commissions for the
faithfulness with which they have discharged their re-
sponsibilities. Their executive secretaries have per-
formed yeoman service, often in very technical and spe-
cialized areas. They have been faithful not only to their
particular assignments but also to our historic position
under the Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions.
Recognition should be given to many others who
have distinguished themselves by their service. In “To-
day’s Business” you will note a list of those now sainted
who served in special or official capacities. You are
invited to submit the names of others who may have
been omitted inadvertently. I trust that an appropriate
resolution will be presented to and adopted by the con-
vention.
The Synod has assigned several major responsibil-
ities to its President. One of these is the supervision of
the doctrine and life in the church. There are various
interpretations of this responsibility. Both the Scrip-
tures and the Synod’s Handbook describe this responsi-
bility as a process. The purpose of the process is to
assure that what we believe, teach, and confess is in
harmony with the Word of God and the Lutheran Con-
fessions. The purpose is to adorn the Gospel with holy
living which honors our God and Savior. In other
words, the President is to supervise the process by
which God’s name is hallowed and the church is edified
by the sharing of God’s Law and Gospel in sound doc-
trine.
The President recognizes from Scripture and from
11
practical experience that God alone preserves His truth
and promotes godly living. It is God who sets the
standards and who enables His people by the Spirit to
receive the truth and to respond to His mercy in Christ.
The President is not an overlord but an undershepherd
of the Good Shepherd.
Yet God uses people in this edification process. He
knows our sinful nature. God remembers what we for-
get: that in our pride we will try to claim the preroga-
tives of God’s Word for our own notions; in our weak-
ness we will be less than what God’s grace can make us.
Precisely because our heavenly Father knows what we
are, He binds His people into a fellowship. As members
of the body of Christ we are to bear one another’s bur-
dens. We are to share the Word for the benefit of each
and of all.
The Synod has wisely and well designated who is to
carry out this process of supervision and how. Accord-
ingly I have tried to carry out personally the responsi-
bility which belongs to the President. At the same time
I have made this supervision also the delegated concern
of the Synod’s Vice-Presidents and of the District Presi-
dents. The President’s office has met regularly with the
administrators and faculties of the Synod’s colleges and
seminaries. The process of supervision has been carried
forward in private and in public, personally and cor-
porately.
Brethren, I want to remind you that this process is
not accomplished when we have written provisions into
the Handbook and then named someone to carry out
these provisions. This is the responsibility of all of us
and not merely of a few officials. If the doctrine and
life of our Synod is not what it should be, then we may
have been failing one another as Christian brethren.
I do not lay this burden on your conscience. God does.
But the burden He lays on us He enables us to bear.
The same Christ who asks us in His new commandment
to love one another even as He has loved us, also gives
us His love for use in our own living and loving.
In our concern for the process of supervising doc-
trine and life we have already made tentative plans for
retreats for the church’s workers. These retreats will
offer opportunities where our Lord’s disciples in our
time can renew their fellowship with their Lord and
with one another. And we have also made preliminary
plans for the Christians in our church to sit at Jesus’
feet by expanding the study program initiated as a re-
sult of the first thrust of Cleveland’s Forward in Faith
resolution. We have taken this action because the doc-
trine and life of the church are our highest concern.
This is what makes us the church. This is our message
and witness to the world.
Even pure doctrine and godly living require some
sort of organization and administration if they are to
accomplish what God wants. Good weather and good
harvest do little good if the grain ends up only in
granaries, far away from hungry and starving people.