Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1965 · 46th Convention › Page 208

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1965, Page 208

front matter 1 front matter 2 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

208 UNPUBLISHED REPORTS AND OVERTURES

is seriously considering becoming a member of the
United Church of South India and in complete fellow-
ship with churches that tolerate denials of the funda-
mental doctrines of historic Christianity (Lutheran
World, Oct. 1962, p.389); and

Wuereas, The leaders of the Church of South India,
a merger of bodies of Anglican, Methodist, Presbyterian,
Reformed, and Congregational traditions, support theo-
logians and pastors who do not believe that Christ is
the only Way to heaven; and

Wuereas, Article VI of the constitution of The Lu-
theran Church — Missouri Synod lists as one of the
Scriptural conditions of membership in the Missouri
Synod the “renunciation of unionism and syncretism of
every description, such as: . . . Participating in hetero-
dox tract and missionary activities”; therefore be it

Resolved, That we memorialize the 1965 Detroit con-
vention of The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod to
request the India Evangelical Lutheran Church to with-
draw from membership in the Federation of Evangelical
Lutheran Churches; and be it further

Resolved, That The Lutheran Church — Missouri
Synod inform the India Evangelical Lutheran Church
that the Missouri Synod cannot remain in fellowship
with any church body which joins the new proposed
United Church of India or with any church body which
is affiliated with or supports the World Council of
Churches; and be it finally

Resolved, That the Missouri Synod inform the India
Evangelical Lutheran Church that The Lutheran Church
— Missouri Synod can no longer support the India
Evangelical Lutheran Church if it joins the new United
Church of India as long as this United Church of India
tolerates modernism and includes heterodox confes-
sions in its official statement of faith.

Rev. WALTER OTTEN
Rev. Cari HOFFMEYER
Rev. Pau, LEHENBAUER
Rev. Roy FauLstick
Mr. FreD BENDEWALD
Dr. WARREN HAMULA
Dr. ROBERT TAYLOR

[3-40 Un]

To Defer Action on Joining Lutheran
Council in the United States of America

Wuereas, The preamble on Scriptures in the consti-
tution of the Lutheran Council in the United States of
America is not sufficiently specific in view of the liberal
position of many regarding the Scriptures, e.g., the ra-
tionalistic approach to many historical parts of the Old
Testament as symbolic and allegoric, especially the first
11 chapters of Genesis; and also the liberal practice of
many; and

Wuereas, Article IV states that the purposes and ob-
jectives of this Council are: “to further the witness, the
work, and the interests of the participating bodies”
(there can be no “joint witness” where there is no mu-

tual acceptance of the principles of interpretation of
Scripture that affect its basic meaning; furthermore,
there can be no joint work on the college and univer-
sity campus, among the Armed Service personnel, or in
the counseling area of welfare work with the ALC and
LCA when there is such a distinct cleavage in the
treatment of God’s Word); and

Wuereas, The proposed Lutheran Council would in
many ways cause us to lose our independence of action,
our efficiency, and even our identity in a certain sense;
and ;

Wuereas, The added expenditure of financing a staff
that duplicates much of our already existing work can-
not be justified; and

Wuereas, We can effectively carry on on a consulta-
tive basis in the next 2 years while further study is
given to the matter of “cooperation” in areas where co-
operation is hardly possible unless we compromise our
position; therefore be it

Resolved, That we defer action on entering the Lu-
theran Council in the United States of America at least
until the next convention, so that congregations may
give more study to this matter.

Rev. W. H. WERNING
Youngstown, Ohio

[3-41 Un]

To Consider Church Fellowship and What
L. W. F. Membership Really Means

The undersigned herewith respectfully petitions the
Synod to weigh carefully — on the basis of Scripture —
how doctrine and practice would be adversely affected
by the Synod’s joining the Lutheran World Federation;
and that in consideration of this issue also the findings
of the Parish Education Committee of the Queensland
District of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Aus-
tralia, as found in “The E.L.C. A. at the Crossroads in
1965— A Report of two pressing problems, compiled
especially for laymen and issued by the Parish Educa-
tion Committee, Queensland District, Evangelical Lu-
theran Church of Australia,” be reviewed and evaluated.
Two copies of the aforesaid report are enclosed here-
with.

In order that the portion of this report bearing di-
rectly on the issues of church fellowship and the Lu-
theran World Federation may be thoroughly considered,
the undersigned further respectfully petitions the Synod
to take the following steps.

I. Make available to all convention delegates chapter
3 of the aforesaid report, this chapter being titled “Aus-
tralian Lutheran Union.” It covers pages 47 to 55 of the
aforesaid report.

II. Approach the findings of the aforesaid report with
Christ-honoring humility, in a spirit of readiness to
check these findings against Scripture, willing to bring
“into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ.”
(2 Cor. 10:5)

III. Humbly, penitently, and conscientiously make

“saisbyattea 5