Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1965 · 46th Convention › Page 234

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1965, Page 234

front matter 1 front matter 2 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

234 UNPUBLISHED REPORTS AND OVERTURES

Jewish Theological Seminary of America, pop gospel,
“the bogy” of interracial marriage, etc. There was one
mention of Lutheran activity, and that was the little
item on Valpo students gathering books for the Miles
College library in Birmingham. It is mentioned that
Miles is a church-related college, but the denomination
is not given. The title of “Commentary & Report”
would seem misleading for this section of your paper
as there is no commentary. All of these excerpts from
the news are simply inserted here with no commentary.
Naturally most of them are complimentary to the
groups involved because most of them are written
by members of those groups. The logical conclusion for
the young readers, since these items appear in their
publication with no adverse comment, is that the or-
ganizations mentioned are accepted by our church in
the terms expressed in the article. We would urge that
comments be added or that this report section be con-
fined to the work of our own Synod.

Another item of some concern is the series of articles
in which a Methodist, a Presbyterian, or someone of
another faith is allowed to criticize our church and its
policies with no rebuttal or conclusion by the writers
for the Lutheran side of the issue. To provoke questions
and to offer no answers can be a dangerous thing. The
rest of the world is always heaping on the questions;
our duty must be at least to offer the answers.

We object also to the insinuation that any Christian
young man or woman who is enlightened and strength-
ened by the Holy Ghost should be willing to take the
lead in interracial marriage, and to the fact that such
marriage is advocated on the basis of Gal. 3:28: “There
is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor
free, there is neither male nor female; for ye are all one
in Christ Jesus.”

While we gladly admit that this passage strikes
against social and racial favoritism in the Christian
churches and that it states most clearly that such dif-
ferences of station do not exist before God, we maintain
that to give this passage a sexual twist, to use it to
deny the reality of race, is only a step from allowing
someone to use this same passage to advocate one world
government or to justify homosexual behavior.

We are not against equality for the races; we are
not opposed to our church facing its social obligations;
but we do ask that we all remember that our first obli-
gation is to our Lord and Savior and that He should
be first in all of our work and speech, including our
publications. We ask that the material produced by our
church be “good and edifying” to the highest possible
degree. We suggest that a series of historical articles
on the heroes of faith—especially those within our
own Synod — would be well in place. We would like
to see any future articles on Lutherans by outsiders
(Gif we must have them) run in parallel with expres-
sions by a good staunch Lutheran on the same points.
We would even suggest that these might well be replaced
with articles by our men on: “Why Not the National

Council of Churches?” or “Why Lutheran Instead of
Presbyterian?”

We pray that you will help us out here in the field,
for the battle is great and the time is short.

NorTHWEST DISTRICT PASTORAL CONFERENCE
Crrcurr 10

Rev. JOHN FRESE

Rev. HENRY FRY

Rev. MayYNArRD HILGENDORF

Rev. GLENN KocH

Rev. Cari Losser

Rev. LEONARD MIETZNER

Rev. Cart RATHJEN

REv. RICHARD TSCHIRLEY

[8-09 Un]
To Place Walther League Under Complete
Control of the Synod’s Board for Young
People’s Work

Wuereas, The Walther League is memorializing the
Synod at its meeting in Detroit, requesting full financial
support; therefore be it

Resolved, That the Walther League be placed under
the complete control of the Synod’s Board for Young
People’s Work.

BoarD OF DIRECTORS
THE SOUTHERN NEBRASKA DISTRICT
THe LUTHERAN CHURCH — MissourI SYNOD

Rosert J. LEEcE, Secretary

[8-10 Un]
To Urge the Synod to Take Corrective Action
Regarding Magazine “Arena”

WuereEas, The present editorial policies of the publi-
cation Arena have been reviewed by the Youth Board
and the Board of Elders at the direction of St. Matthew’s
Lutheran Congregation, Houston, Tex., and have been
found to be lacking in fundamental Christian prin-
ciples as generally accepted and subscribed to by our
church; and

Wuereas, We object to articles of low morals, ecu-
menism, and other subject matter which is in conflict
with sound Lutheran theology and which can only re-
sult in and breed doubt and loss of faith in the youth
of our Synod; therefore be it

Resolved, That we strongly urge the Synod to take
corrective action regarding this magazine and its edi-
torial staff.

St. MattHew’s Lutu. Cone.

Houston, Tex.

J. R. Tacquarp, Chairman of Youth Board

M. H. Kiescunicx, Chairman of Board of Elders
M. A. LeHmann, President of Congregation

B. Houman, Secretary of Congregation

W. W. Stratman, Pastor

i
|
|
}
t

SI AMR TT

Boa

AOR PTE REE

nee.

E
b