# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1965_S287 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) ER ES EL ESE ARIE EAN SEEN SLE EAE A AS HE MEPIS SI IESE EISNER Eve He was set forth in THEOLOGY oF FELLOWSHIP, Part II, from writings of St. Augustine, of Luther, and from the Preface to The Book of Concord. Titus 3:10, 11 A man that is an heretick after the first and second admonition reject; Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sin- neth, being condemned of himself. The term rendered “heretick” by the King James Version is translated in the RSV as “a man that is factious,” that is, a man who creates factions or divisions. This rendering is in accord with the original mean- ing of the term. Whether he makes factions by means of false doctrine, as is usually the case, or whether he divides the church by other means, does not alter the church’s duty with respect to him. A man who seeks to divide the church is to be admonished once or twice, and then avoided. For it is evident that, if the church successfully avoids a man who would divide it, he cannot accomplish his aim. The heretic or factious man, who will not yield to admonition, is judged to be a self-condemned man. On this passage Luther says: Heretics do not merely err, but refuse to be instructed, defend their error as being right, and fight against the truth, which they know, and against their own con- science. Concerning such St. Paul says (Titus 3:11, 12): You are to avoid a heretic, when he has been admon- ished once or twice, and you are to know that such a man is perverted, and sins autocatacritos, that is, intentionally, and against better knowledge, and wants to remain in his error.1° It should be obvious that Titus 3:10 should be ap- plied, not to erring Christians, who can be corrected, but to stubborn errorists who refuse to be instructed. 2 Cor. 6:14-18 Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers, for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteous- ness? and what communion hath Hght with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty. In this passage, addressed to the Christians who lived in the heathen environment of Corinth, where both the Christian faith and Christian morality were constantly in danger, Paul warns, “Be not unequally yoked together with unbelievers.” It is clear that the people against whom the apostle warns are not erring Christians, but the unbelievers by whom they were surrounded. It is not crystal clear precisely what the apostle meant by “being unequally yoked together.” The Greek word, “heterozygountes,” is found only here in the New Testament, and only once in the Greek translation of the Old Testament, the Septuagint, where it is used to translate the word rendered in the King James Version as “gender with THEOLOGY OF FELLOWSHIP 287 a diverse kind” (Lev.19:19). It has often, and with reason, been understood as forbidding Christians to marry unbelievers. In the Lutheran Church the passage has been re- ferred in a wider sense to fellowship. At the time of the Reformation Luther used it to warn against having anything to do with the Roman Catholic mass, which he considered idolatrous. The passage is applied a num- ber of times against the Roman Catholic Church in the Lutheran Confessions.}? Our Confessions do not use the passage against the Reformed, nor against erring Lutherans. Later the pas- sage was used by Lutherans against Reformed teachers, whom they considered stubborn heretics. Finally, in the history of the Lutheran Church in this country, some Lutherans, also in our own Synod, used the pas- sage to forbid fellowship with other Lutherans who were considered to be in error. It is evident that those who use the passage in this way have gone beyond the clear words of the text, which forbids being “unequally yoked together with unbelievers.” Summary Statement Concerning all these passages it is clear that they were originally spoken or written for specific situations and apply first of all to these specific situations. It is, however, equally true that, like all Scripture these passages too were written for our learning (Rom. 15:4), and the church must, until the end of time, study also these passages and draw from them light and in- struction for her life in fellowship. She will use them properly when she is taught by them to avoid men who, either by false teaching or separatistic, schismatic, fac- tious activities attack the Gospel and the faith of Chris- tians. She will be misusing these passages if she uses them to hinder the church’s ongoing attempts to heal the schisms in the church and to foster the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. B. UNIONISM AND SEPARATISM In the discussions of the question of church fellow- ship among Lutherans two terms are frequently used, unionism and separatism. Neither word has been de- fined either uniformly or in a manner acceptable to all. This lack of clearcut definitions has been a serious hindrance to profitable discussions and mutual under- standing. In the following we attempt to clarify these two concepts in a manner that is consonant with the teach- ings of Scripture and of the Lutheran Confessions. 1. Unionism The terms unionism and unionist as ecclesiastical terms came into use in connection with the efforts of King Friedrich Wilhelm III of Prussia to effect a union of the Lutheran and of the Reformed churches in his realm in 1817, the tercentenary of the Reformation. The union was to be effected by declaring the doctrines which divided the two confessions to be differences in nonessentials.