Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1965 · 46th Convention › Page 201

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1965, Page 201

front matter 1 front matter 2 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

2. DOCTRINAL MATTERS 201

[2-44 Un] 2. Doctrinal Matters

To Request the Synod to Reconsider Her
Position on Woman Suffrage

Wuereas, Woman suffrage is not specifically treated
in Scripture, and the Synod has not said that the Bible
definitely forbids woman suffrage in the church, accord-
ing to the 1956 and 1959 synodical committee reports;
and

Wuereas, “The precise method of administration of
the congregational affairs in the early church is not
ascertainable” (Reports and Memorials, 1956, p. 559);
and

Wuereas, Much controversy exists on 1 Corinthians
14:34 as to whether St. Paul was speaking only to the
Corinthian congregation at that time or if this admoni-
tion was intended for the church throughout the ages;
and

Wuereas, God Himself permitted women to speak,
preach, and prophesy and imbued certain women with
the gift of prophecy: Miriam, Deborah, Huldah, and
Anna; and

WuereEas, Romans 16:1 tells us that St. Paul gave his
approval to Phoebe, who according to Kretzmann’s com-
mentary held the office of deaconess in the congrega-
tion at Cenchrea; and

Wuereas, Galatians 3:26-29 tells us: “There is
neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free,
there is neither male nor female; for you are all one
in Christ Jesus”; and

Wuereas, The Synod’s policy is not in accordance
with St. Paul’s admonition that women should not teach,
as the women of our congregations are encouraged and
urged to teach in our Sunday schools, Bible classes,
vacation Bible schools, and as professional Christian
day school teachers, youth workers, and deaconesses,
and instead this word “teach” is construed to mean
cannot “vote”; and

Wuereas, The Synod’s policy through the years has
deprived the church of much needed womanpower
through the attitude toward the women of the church,
and we as a congregation feel that greater good can
be accomplished in furthering the Kingdom of God by
permitting the women of the Synod to vote in their
congregations; therefore be it

Resolved, That we add our voice to others requesting
the Synod to reconsider its stand on woman suffrage and
trust that it will see fit to grant this privilege to the
faithful women of our congregation.

THe Voters’ ASSEMBLY
St. MarrHew’s Ev, LUTHERAN CHURCH
Bergenfield, N. J.

Rosert C. Bauer, Secretary
CarLTon A. ADLER, Pastor

[2-45 Un]

To Request that Five Overtures Not Submitted
to the 1962 Convention Be Submitted
to the 1965 Convention of The Lutheran
Church — Missouri Synod

Wuereas, 1.25¢ of the Handbook of The Lutheran
Church — Missouri Synod declares: “AI! memorials or
overtures sent to the President shall be submitted to the
Synod through one of its convention committees”; and

WuereEas, A number of memorials sent to the Presi-
dent to be presented to the 1962 convention of The Lu-
theran Church — Missouri Synod were not submitted
to the convention; and

WuereEas, These memorials were sent in the proper
constitutional manner to the President of the Missouri
Synod; and

WuerEAs, These unsubmitted memorials include the
following:

(1) Concordia College, Bronxville, N. Y.

Wuereas, The following statements appear in mim-
eographed notes written and distributed by a religion
instructor at Concordia Collegiate Institute in Bronx-
ville, N. Y., for Religion 112 and 113A:

1. “When the great story [Old Testament history] was
committed to writing is not certain. At first the his-
tory was transmitted orally as was everything else
considered worth remembering. The writing of a na-
tion’s story was practiced in ancient times only in
moments of crisis when oral tradition was endangered,
when a break in a nation’s history occurred and its
memories were in danger of being obliterated. For
this reason modern scholars say the OT history books
are both preexilic and post-exilic: the stories are an-
cient, but the final written form of the narratives are
often post-exilic.”

2. “The Priestly History (Gen, Ex, Lev, Numb). During
the exile a circle of priests added materials rescued
from the Temple, especially rules and regulations con-
cerning worship and priesthood. They stress the idea
of God’s tabernacling among His people.”

3. “The Deuteronomic History of Israel in the Promised
Land, Deut, Josh, Judg, 1-2 Sam, 1-2 Kings. The
core of Deuteronomy was discovered in Josiah’s reign
622 BC.”

4, “There is no prophecy in Israel before the 11. c. B.C.”

5. “Second Isaiah, the unknown prophet of Isaiah’s
school who is responsible for chapters 40—66, lived
in Babylon.”

6. “When we speak of three ‘persons’ we do not mean
three separate personalities. We must speak of the
‘three’ because there is an irreducible threeness about
the revelation of God to men.”

7. “What is death? It is the absolute end of earthly ex-
istence from which no man and no part of man is
exempt. The Greeks thought that death struck the
body while the soul went undisturbed on its way. But
the Bible knows that sin begins in a man’s heart or
soul, and death strikes the whole man.”

therefore be it

Resolved, That the Synod declare at its 1962 Cleve-
land convention (1) whether the above views will be
tolerated in the Synod and (2) whether it will be per-