Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1965 · 46th Convention › Page 244

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1965, Page 244

front matter 1 front matter 2 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

244 UNPUBLISHED REPORTS AND OVERTURES

it is, however, found through spot checking that there
are valid grounds for genuine alarm; and

Wuereas, The often stated arguments, herein listed,
that cause many to conclude falsely that imitation
organs are desirable in preference to pipe organs, can
easily be refuted as follows:

J. Many more ranks or stops can be had for less
money in an imitation organ than in a pipe organ.
E. Power Biggs, a renowned organist, in his tape record-
ing of 125 examples of European organs, “The Organ”
(Columbia DL-5288), says concerning this allegation:
“This is a modern organ in Holland with just 6 stops.
Surely this is vastly preferable to an electronic imita-
tion, which lacking pipes lacks the first essential of
an organ.”

2. More room is required for a pipe organ than for
an imitation organ. In reality the reverse is true if the
imitation organ honestly provides enough individual
speakers to approach the sounds of each individual pipe
of a pipe organ.

3. An old 10—50-rank pipe organ can be replaced
with an imitation organ for less than the cost of repairs
to the pipe organ. This may well be true. But this
implies that it costs more to maintain a pipe organ than
an imitation organ, which is certainly not true. The
only part of a pipe organ that ordinarily needs attention
is the maintenance of working parts, often referred to as
electronic, and tuning of the pipes. The pipes stand for
centuries. An imitation organ can be compared with
$4,000 to $65,000 worth of radio and television sets with
their endless maintenance problems and depreciation
by obsolescence, calling for some type of trade-in
agreement.

4, Pipe organs get out of tune, and their tuning can
be only as good as the skill of the tuner. This is true
but not undesirable, and many pipe organs go for years
without complete tuning, giving great satisfaction.
In fact, in the pipe organ it is this individuality of each
pipe that gives the same unsurpassed effect created in
great choirs and in symphony orchestras, particularly by
the dozens of string instruments and slide trombones,
where intonation in all cases is dependent entirely on
the fallible ears and skill of each musician.

5. A more accomplished organist is required to play
a pipe organ than to play an imitation organ. Actually
not only is this false, but the direct opposite is true.
To have an imitation organ attempt to stir the emotions,
not only is an accomplished organist required, but only
certain well-suited selections can be used under only
most favorable conditions and with clever use of tremolo
and swell. Tremolo, swell, sustained sounds, and im-
pressive consoles are the only features imitation organs
have in common with a pipe organ.

6. It is necessary to pay an exorbitant price for a
good pipe organ. This is most certainly not true. The
first unit of a fine, new pipe organ can be installed for
$3,700 to $4,200, consisting of diapason, flute, and string
voices. The reed and more bass can be added when they

can be afforded or desired to make a complete set
of the 4 voices totaling 340 pipes at a total cost of $5,500
to $7,500 installed and in a space just 5’8” by 10/10”
distributed as desired. The 2-manual console may have
manuals added if desired as the number of pipes is
increased from time to time through the organ fund.
These small units can provide enough pure pipe organ
music for the largest church if some distortion inevitable
in amplifiers and speakers can be tolerated; and

Wuereas, The best of materials is utilized wherever
possible in our buildings, except in the installation of
an organ, when as Dr. Reed indicated “well-meant
economy” often becomes “false economy.” “Apparent
economy is an added inducement for selection of these
substitute instruments. The economy is only apparent.
Electronic instruments, however cheap to begin with,
wear out rapidly, needing constant repair and frequent
replacement. A good pipe organ on the other hand may
last for centuries.” (Luther D. Reed, Worship [Muhlen-
berg Press], pp. 279, 280); and

Wuereas, The Roman Catholic Church found it
necessary to issue a decree several years ago as an
attempt to retard degeneracy of her organ music, the
following being an excerpt from said decree:

The simulated organ, commonly called “electronic” may
be tolerated temporarily for liturgical services if means
for procuring a pipe organ, even a small one, are not
available. In each individual case, however, the explicit
permission of the local Ordinary is required. (Excerpts
pp. 21, 22 from September 1958, “Degree on Participation
in the Mass” [Liturgical Press, Collegeville, Minn.]})

and

Wuereas, Some of our pastors, parishioners, and
even members of organ purchasing committees have
been led to state sincerely that they don’t hear a dif-
ference between pipe organs and imitation organs and
also state that they believe few people in a congregation
will recognize an appreciable difference and refer to
inconclusive demonstrations by promoters of imitation
organs, allegedly proving that even some pipe organ
experts cannot hear a difference. Another quotation
from Reed’s Worship applies to the above statements:
“Untrained ears, accustomed to similar commonplace
qualities in radio reproduction, are often unable to
recognize these deficiencies. But anyone who has come
to know and love true pipe-organ music will be imme-
diately repelled”; and

Wuereas, It is highly desirable that pipe organs be
used everywhere possible in our Synod, in churches,
schools, universities, seminaries, and where instruction
is given in organ playing, not only to avoid offending
the musical ear of many of our people but to offer an
incentive to develop a greater number of competent
organists in our Synod and to encourage organ building,
an art that could be lost; therefore be it

Resolved, By this 46th regular convention of The
Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod that the pipe organ
be declared the official organ of our church and that
any organ other than a pipe organ is a substitute; and
be it further

1 -cncenen-nateennnagmant sanetennataernmsrenttaserseepuiyrer ee EEE tare «manana emomemeptent

| ee OE ENT NE NN ERE EE Tey

svelpeiinnnen mee emt ee

EERE RCP emo