Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1965 · 46th Convention › Page 244
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1965, Page 244
front matter 1
front matter 2
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
244 UNPUBLISHED REPORTS AND OVERTURES
it is, however, found through spot checking that there
are valid grounds for genuine alarm; and
Wuereas, The often stated arguments, herein listed,
that cause many to conclude falsely that imitation
organs are desirable in preference to pipe organs, can
easily be refuted as follows:
J. Many more ranks or stops can be had for less
money in an imitation organ than in a pipe organ.
E. Power Biggs, a renowned organist, in his tape record-
ing of 125 examples of European organs, “The Organ”
(Columbia DL-5288), says concerning this allegation:
“This is a modern organ in Holland with just 6 stops.
Surely this is vastly preferable to an electronic imita-
tion, which lacking pipes lacks the first essential of
an organ.”
2. More room is required for a pipe organ than for
an imitation organ. In reality the reverse is true if the
imitation organ honestly provides enough individual
speakers to approach the sounds of each individual pipe
of a pipe organ.
3. An old 10—50-rank pipe organ can be replaced
with an imitation organ for less than the cost of repairs
to the pipe organ. This may well be true. But this
implies that it costs more to maintain a pipe organ than
an imitation organ, which is certainly not true. The
only part of a pipe organ that ordinarily needs attention
is the maintenance of working parts, often referred to as
electronic, and tuning of the pipes. The pipes stand for
centuries. An imitation organ can be compared with
$4,000 to $65,000 worth of radio and television sets with
their endless maintenance problems and depreciation
by obsolescence, calling for some type of trade-in
agreement.
4, Pipe organs get out of tune, and their tuning can
be only as good as the skill of the tuner. This is true
but not undesirable, and many pipe organs go for years
without complete tuning, giving great satisfaction.
In fact, in the pipe organ it is this individuality of each
pipe that gives the same unsurpassed effect created in
great choirs and in symphony orchestras, particularly by
the dozens of string instruments and slide trombones,
where intonation in all cases is dependent entirely on
the fallible ears and skill of each musician.
5. A more accomplished organist is required to play
a pipe organ than to play an imitation organ. Actually
not only is this false, but the direct opposite is true.
To have an imitation organ attempt to stir the emotions,
not only is an accomplished organist required, but only
certain well-suited selections can be used under only
most favorable conditions and with clever use of tremolo
and swell. Tremolo, swell, sustained sounds, and im-
pressive consoles are the only features imitation organs
have in common with a pipe organ.
6. It is necessary to pay an exorbitant price for a
good pipe organ. This is most certainly not true. The
first unit of a fine, new pipe organ can be installed for
$3,700 to $4,200, consisting of diapason, flute, and string
voices. The reed and more bass can be added when they
can be afforded or desired to make a complete set
of the 4 voices totaling 340 pipes at a total cost of $5,500
to $7,500 installed and in a space just 5’8” by 10/10”
distributed as desired. The 2-manual console may have
manuals added if desired as the number of pipes is
increased from time to time through the organ fund.
These small units can provide enough pure pipe organ
music for the largest church if some distortion inevitable
in amplifiers and speakers can be tolerated; and
Wuereas, The best of materials is utilized wherever
possible in our buildings, except in the installation of
an organ, when as Dr. Reed indicated “well-meant
economy” often becomes “false economy.” “Apparent
economy is an added inducement for selection of these
substitute instruments. The economy is only apparent.
Electronic instruments, however cheap to begin with,
wear out rapidly, needing constant repair and frequent
replacement. A good pipe organ on the other hand may
last for centuries.” (Luther D. Reed, Worship [Muhlen-
berg Press], pp. 279, 280); and
Wuereas, The Roman Catholic Church found it
necessary to issue a decree several years ago as an
attempt to retard degeneracy of her organ music, the
following being an excerpt from said decree:
The simulated organ, commonly called “electronic” may
be tolerated temporarily for liturgical services if means
for procuring a pipe organ, even a small one, are not
available. In each individual case, however, the explicit
permission of the local Ordinary is required. (Excerpts
pp. 21, 22 from September 1958, “Degree on Participation
in the Mass” [Liturgical Press, Collegeville, Minn.]})
and
Wuereas, Some of our pastors, parishioners, and
even members of organ purchasing committees have
been led to state sincerely that they don’t hear a dif-
ference between pipe organs and imitation organs and
also state that they believe few people in a congregation
will recognize an appreciable difference and refer to
inconclusive demonstrations by promoters of imitation
organs, allegedly proving that even some pipe organ
experts cannot hear a difference. Another quotation
from Reed’s Worship applies to the above statements:
“Untrained ears, accustomed to similar commonplace
qualities in radio reproduction, are often unable to
recognize these deficiencies. But anyone who has come
to know and love true pipe-organ music will be imme-
diately repelled”; and
Wuereas, It is highly desirable that pipe organs be
used everywhere possible in our Synod, in churches,
schools, universities, seminaries, and where instruction
is given in organ playing, not only to avoid offending
the musical ear of many of our people but to offer an
incentive to develop a greater number of competent
organists in our Synod and to encourage organ building,
an art that could be lost; therefore be it
Resolved, By this 46th regular convention of The
Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod that the pipe organ
be declared the official organ of our church and that
any organ other than a pipe organ is a substitute; and
be it further
1 -cncenen-nateennnagmant sanetennataernmsrenttaserseepuiyrer ee EEE tare «manana emomemeptent
| ee OE ENT NE NN ERE EE Tey
svelpeiinnnen mee emt ee
EERE RCP emo