Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1965 · 46th Convention › Page 170
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1965, Page 170
front matter 1
front matter 2
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
4
‘
|
.
;
170 RESOLUTIONS — COMMITTEE 9
the name of Christ employ every God-pleasing method
of helping them.
Action: This resolution was adopted.
To Decline Overture Regarding Nationalistic
Teaching, etc.
RESOLUTION 9-19
Overture 9-20 (CW, pp. 345, 346)
Whereas, Overture 9-20 appears to be unclear in its
assumptions and implications; therefore be it
Resolved, That Overture 9-20 be declined.
Action: This resolution was adopted.
To Urge Our People to Study Immigration
Proposals Before Congress
RESOLUTION 9-20
Overture 9-21 Un (URO, p. 44)
Whereas, Existing legislation governing the entry
of immigrants into our country has severe shortcom-
ings, as a result of which neither Christian humani-
tarianism nor our own national self-interest is ade-
quately served; and
Wuereas, The following five objectives can provide
a basis for a law that will be equitable to all and will
most truly serve the public welfare:
1. To supply our permanent population with a steady
proportion of newcomers who have chosen the United
States as their new homeland and can impart to their
American neighbors an understanding of the cultures,
attitudes, and interests of other races and peoples of
the world;
2. To assure our nation’s proper share of interna-
tional responsibility for the resettlement of refugees and
other persons urgently in need of the compassionate
haven of a new homeland;
3. To protect the integrity of the basic family unit
and facilitate the reuniting of families;
4. To facilitate the entry of persons possessing spe-
cial skills or other capacities needed by the American
economy and culture;
5. To admit annually a reasonable number of the
persons described above on an objective basis of selec-
tion which, while discriminating, will not be discrim-
inatory with respect to race, national origin, color, or
religion, testifying thereby to our nation’s recognition
of the interlocking and mutual interests of all nations
with regard to the migration of people, the interaction
of culture, and the respect for universal human rights;
and
Wuereas, Congress is now considering legislation
which represents substantial progress toward fulfilling
the hope of establishing equitable immigration laws that
are fair and just to all and will serve the public wel-
fare; therefore be it
Resolved, That The Lutheran Church — Missouri
Synod, in convention assembled, urge the members of
its congregations to study the proposals now before
Congress in relation to the above five objectives and
to give their support as their conscience dictates in the
interest of enacting immigration legislation which will
be equitable, fair, and just to all and will most truly
redound to the public welfare.
Action: This resolution was adopted.
Four Resolutions on Racial Questions, ete.
Preface to Resolutions 9-21, 9-22, 9-23, and 9-24
In addressing itself to the issues which resulted in
the following resolutions, the floor committee on Social
Action and Welfare approached its task in the context
of “Effective Christian Social Action,” a comprehensive
introductory statement drawn up and approved by the
Commission on Social Action. This statement is quoted
extensively in Report 9-01 of the commission (CW,
pp. 327, 328), and we feel that several paragraphs are
worth repeating here.
The Primacy of the Gospel in the Church
Synod itself and the local congregations must ever be
concerned, primarily, with the Gospel of salvation and
the Word of God’s truth (Romans 1:16, 17; Luke 12:
13,14). The Word of God’s love in Christ must always be
the first and only source of the church’s faith and
work. ... There are indications today that weakness in
carrying out primary functions . .. have resulted in
some of the troubles which now plague church and
nation. A true revival of the use of the Word of God’s
love in Christ Jesus is the best hope for social action
and influence in today’s world.
The Social Implications of the Gospel
The church does have a clear responsibility . . . to be
a leaven. Christians must ever seek to strengthen and
preserve social and civic well-being (cf. Jeremiah 29:7,
1 Timothy 2:1-8). Moses and the Old Testament proph-
ets, especially Isaiah, Jeremiah, Micah, and Amos, spoke
out fearlessly against civic and social evil as part of their
preaching of the Law. God’s prophets have always been
fearless in speaking up for righteousness, even when they
had to stand alone. Christ Himself said: “Render there-
fore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto
God the things that are God’s” (Matthew 22:21). Chris-
tians must ever remember that they are called by God
into a relationship with their fellowmen in which they
show love and concern for all, display God as the source
of their life, and ultimately speak the Word that recon-
ciles man to God. (1 Peter 2:12-17)
The commission’s report states the essential doctrinal
and ideological problem thus:
The Heart of the Matter
The church must ever lift a prophetic voice if it is
to be faithful to God and relevant to the personal and
social life of man. . .. The church alone can preach
both Law and Gospel for the purpose of building God’s
eternal kingdom... .
Any churchly commitment to a special or specific
solution to a temporal problem is always highly tenta-
tive and dangerous. Any ecclesiastical affiliation with
a political party, group, or movement will be precarious
and may be clearly wrong. How can a “Thus saith the
Lord” be pronounced over any law which attempts to
establish a specific minimum wage or to settle some