Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1965 · 46th Convention › Page 30

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1965, Page 30

front matter 1 front matter 2 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

30 DOCTRINAL-DEVOTIONAL ESSAYS

scored in this convention. Conventions of this church
are not held in order to fill the communications media
of our age with new news about the church. We are
here only to do God’s will, to walk in His ways, and
to perform His work. The world may deride us for our
position. But this is precisely the cost of our disciple-
ship. Many a resolution that we pass here may make
us the object of the world’s scorn. Yet, if God says,
“Yes!” this convention dare not say, “No!” And if God
says, “No!” this convention dare not say, “Yes!” No
matter what the communications media think of our
decisions, we will be willing to pay the price. Are you
willing as delegates to pay the price?

The church ever lives in the afterglow of Easter.
The risen Lord is her only Strength. The Word of God
is her infallible tool. The world of man is her field
of action. “Faith Forward!” is her motto. And victory
is her eternal destiny. That’s the meaning of the words:
“Even so send I you.”

Who Is the Sender?

We'll have to have clarity in the answer to the ques-
tion: “Who is the Sender?” We know the mandate:
“Go!” Are we clear as to the identity of Him who told
us to go and to be a holy community in an unholy
world, to make of an unholy world a holy community?
Perhaps we'll have to answer this question in a double
way, both negatively and positively. Unless there is
clarity on the identity of the Sender, there may be no
authority undergirding the mandate.

To see Him once again we must return to that room
in Jerusalem, 11 men behind locked doors — hiding.
Sad faces, trembling hearts, whispered conversation,
forgetful of every promise, unmindful of every predic-
tion, shaken to the very depths of their being by the
prattle of some women who said, “We saw Him! He’s
alive!”

Mary Magdalene said it. Mark adds: “They ...
believed [her] not” (Mark 16:11). Joanna said it, Mary
the mother of James said it, and other women said it.
Luke adds: “They believed them not” (Luke 24:11).
Two dust-covered men from Emmaus rush into Jeru-
salem and say, “We saw Him!” What does Mark add?
“neither believed they them.” (Mark 16:13)

What do you do with men like that? Nothing will
help them except a personal confrontation with the
risen Christ. God’s friends thought it couldn’t happen.
God’s enemies said it wouldn’t happen. But it did hap-
pen. In that moment the risen Christ steps among His
trembling disciples and gives them the world’s greatest

tranquilizer. “Peace,—to you!” Were they tranquil?
Not at all. Luke says: “They were terrified” because
they thought they had seen a ghost. (Luke 24:37)

Then it happened. “Why are you troubled? Look
at my hands and feet. It is I!” (Luke 24:38, 39). Then
first were the disciples glad. Here was unbelief re-
solving itself into faith, doubt into certainty, and fear
into joy. Here was the vindication of His challenge:
“Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it
up” (John 2:19). Here is the risen Christ and none

other, the “blessed and only Potentate, the King of
kings and Lord of lords” (1 Tim.6:15). Here is the
only One who could give a mandate to His people.

Twenty centuries have not dealt kindly with the
Sender. A large segment in Christendom is still search-
ing for an answer to the question, Who is He? Make
no mistake about it, Christology is in our enlightened
age still the great battleground of the Christian church.
Who is He? Go back 16 centuries and behold the
struggle of the church. When the struggle was over,
the church stood before the world holding high its
manifesto. And what did the manifesto of the Nicene
Ecumenical Council say in the year 325? It said
negatively:

Christ, the Sender, Is Not the Christ of Arius

Who was Arius? A teacher who brought trouble
into the church. And even though Bishop Alexander
had excommunicated him, he wouldn’t stop talking
and making propaganda for his ill-conceived theologi-
cal deductions and conclusions. He taught that God is
utterly inaccessible, for He is removed from the world
by an impassable gulf. Ergo, He created out of nothing
an intermediate being who was called the Son of God
but who was not eternal, who was not God, who was
in all things unlike God. According to Arius, this Son
of God was not inherently sinless, but He could choose
the good and continue therein. He redeemed mankind
by showing how men might choose the good and be-
come sons of God.

With this kind of teaching rampant in the church,
something had to be done. Emperor Constantine said,
“Let’s hold an ecumenical council. Let’s get together.”
Note well, this council was not called by the bishops.
In that day nobody had as yet heard the words: Roma
locuta, causa finita, “Rome has spoken, the case is
settled.’ Here was an emperor who called together the
people of God. The council opens. The first to make
a proposal to resolve the struggle for truth was Euse-
bius of Nicomedia, who sided with Arius. In presenting
his false conclusions based on false premises, he said
things which the delegates did not like, and summarily
they rejected his proposal.

Eusebius of Caesarea arises. He has another pro-
posal. What do the delegates reply? “You’re pussy-
footing!” And then comes a young deacon. He wasn’t
a delegate. His bishop thought it would be good to take
him along. So Alexander brings Athanasius with him.
Athanasius arises and gives to men clarity as to the
identity of the Sender. And when the document, the
manifesto, is finished, the whole church stood before
the world and said what you said so bravely last night
in the Nicene Creed: “God of God, Light of Light,
Very God of Very God, Begotten, not made, Being of
one substance with the Father, By whom all things
were made.” And what is our prayer today? “Oh,
please, God, in the confusion of our time give us an-
other Athanasius at this convention who will speak
with clarity as to the identity of the Sender, and not

be like unto Eusebius Number One with his falsehood,

See wainzee

ou
r ¥ “

Ea ae ere ae tet eee

:
A
z
ag