# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1965_S30 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 30 DOCTRINAL-DEVOTIONAL ESSAYS scored in this convention. Conventions of this church are not held in order to fill the communications media of our age with new news about the church. We are here only to do God’s will, to walk in His ways, and to perform His work. The world may deride us for our position. But this is precisely the cost of our disciple- ship. Many a resolution that we pass here may make us the object of the world’s scorn. Yet, if God says, “Yes!” this convention dare not say, “No!” And if God says, “No!” this convention dare not say, “Yes!” No matter what the communications media think of our decisions, we will be willing to pay the price. Are you willing as delegates to pay the price? The church ever lives in the afterglow of Easter. The risen Lord is her only Strength. The Word of God is her infallible tool. The world of man is her field of action. “Faith Forward!” is her motto. And victory is her eternal destiny. That’s the meaning of the words: “Even so send I you.” Who Is the Sender? We'll have to have clarity in the answer to the ques- tion: “Who is the Sender?” We know the mandate: “Go!” Are we clear as to the identity of Him who told us to go and to be a holy community in an unholy world, to make of an unholy world a holy community? Perhaps we'll have to answer this question in a double way, both negatively and positively. Unless there is clarity on the identity of the Sender, there may be no authority undergirding the mandate. To see Him once again we must return to that room in Jerusalem, 11 men behind locked doors — hiding. Sad faces, trembling hearts, whispered conversation, forgetful of every promise, unmindful of every predic- tion, shaken to the very depths of their being by the prattle of some women who said, “We saw Him! He’s alive!” Mary Magdalene said it. Mark adds: “They ... believed [her] not” (Mark 16:11). Joanna said it, Mary the mother of James said it, and other women said it. Luke adds: “They believed them not” (Luke 24:11). Two dust-covered men from Emmaus rush into Jeru- salem and say, “We saw Him!” What does Mark add? “neither believed they them.” (Mark 16:13) What do you do with men like that? Nothing will help them except a personal confrontation with the risen Christ. God’s friends thought it couldn’t happen. God’s enemies said it wouldn’t happen. But it did hap- pen. In that moment the risen Christ steps among His trembling disciples and gives them the world’s greatest tranquilizer. “Peace,—to you!” Were they tranquil? Not at all. Luke says: “They were terrified” because they thought they had seen a ghost. (Luke 24:37) Then it happened. “Why are you troubled? Look at my hands and feet. It is I!” (Luke 24:38, 39). Then first were the disciples glad. Here was unbelief re- solving itself into faith, doubt into certainty, and fear into joy. Here was the vindication of His challenge: “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up” (John 2:19). Here is the risen Christ and none other, the “blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings and Lord of lords” (1 Tim.6:15). Here is the only One who could give a mandate to His people. Twenty centuries have not dealt kindly with the Sender. A large segment in Christendom is still search- ing for an answer to the question, Who is He? Make no mistake about it, Christology is in our enlightened age still the great battleground of the Christian church. Who is He? Go back 16 centuries and behold the struggle of the church. When the struggle was over, the church stood before the world holding high its manifesto. And what did the manifesto of the Nicene Ecumenical Council say in the year 325? It said negatively: Christ, the Sender, Is Not the Christ of Arius Who was Arius? A teacher who brought trouble into the church. And even though Bishop Alexander had excommunicated him, he wouldn’t stop talking and making propaganda for his ill-conceived theologi- cal deductions and conclusions. He taught that God is utterly inaccessible, for He is removed from the world by an impassable gulf. Ergo, He created out of nothing an intermediate being who was called the Son of God but who was not eternal, who was not God, who was in all things unlike God. According to Arius, this Son of God was not inherently sinless, but He could choose the good and continue therein. He redeemed mankind by showing how men might choose the good and be- come sons of God. With this kind of teaching rampant in the church, something had to be done. Emperor Constantine said, “Let’s hold an ecumenical council. Let’s get together.” Note well, this council was not called by the bishops. In that day nobody had as yet heard the words: Roma locuta, causa finita, “Rome has spoken, the case is settled.’ Here was an emperor who called together the people of God. The council opens. The first to make a proposal to resolve the struggle for truth was Euse- bius of Nicomedia, who sided with Arius. In presenting his false conclusions based on false premises, he said things which the delegates did not like, and summarily they rejected his proposal. Eusebius of Caesarea arises. He has another pro- posal. What do the delegates reply? “You’re pussy- footing!” And then comes a young deacon. He wasn’t a delegate. His bishop thought it would be good to take him along. So Alexander brings Athanasius with him. Athanasius arises and gives to men clarity as to the identity of the Sender. And when the document, the manifesto, is finished, the whole church stood before the world and said what you said so bravely last night in the Nicene Creed: “God of God, Light of Light, Very God of Very God, Begotten, not made, Being of one substance with the Father, By whom all things were made.” And what is our prayer today? “Oh, please, God, in the confusion of our time give us an- other Athanasius at this convention who will speak with clarity as to the identity of the Sender, and not be like unto Eusebius Number One with his falsehood, See wainzee ou r ¥ “ Ea ae ere ae tet eee : A z ag