Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1923 · 32nd Convention, Fort Wayne › Page 83

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1923, Page 83

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

» By. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1923. 83

3, Appeal of Mr. and Mrs. Whipple. — Synod sustained the deci-

n of the Church of Our Savior, St. Paul, Minn., and of the

Raglish District, exhorting Mr. and Mrs. Whipple to recognize in

, verdict of the congregation the voice of the Lord.

4, Appeal of Mrs. Lampe of St. Louis. — Since Mrs. Lampe re-

to appear before the committee of the English District

ted to investigate her case upon her appeal to the English
trict, Synod refused to entertain the appeal and referred her to

. ‘the appointed committee of the English District.

5 Appeal of Mr. and Mrs. H. F. Pieper, Edwardsville, Iu. —

ynod’s decision of 1920 was sustained. .

6. Appeal of Pastor J. H. Fuhrmann. — The appeal was rejected.

INTERSYNODICAL MATTERS.
(Germ. Rep., p. 227.)

Since the convention at Detroit three to four meetings were
conducted. annually with representatives from the Wisconsin, Iowa,
Ohio, and Buffalo synods. Theses and antitheses have been adopted
“on the doctrine of conversion and election. Protest has also been
lodged against some of these theses (5, 12, 28, 29).

Synod resolved that a committee be appointed for the purpose
of testing these union theses. Said committee is to examine all
' objections which have so far been lodged — and shall have been
Jodged until the end of 1925 — and report its findings at the next
convention.

Whereas the Intersynodical Committee also reported that dis-
_- eussions on the older doctrinal controversies which have for so long

‘a time separated especially the Missouri, Iowa, and Buffalo synods,
have been begun, Synod resolved — ;
1. To continue the discussions and to that end again elect an
- Intersynodical Committee; ,
2. To express its joy over the fact that these earnest efforts to
get together with the other Lutheran synods are being made. Synod
hopes that by God’s grace complete unity of faith will be achieved.

; Agreement with the Norwegian Synod.
, ; (Germ. Rep., p. 229.)
The Norwegian Synod of the American Evangelical Lutheran

Church petitioned Synod for permission to send its students to Con-
cordia Seminary, St. Louis, Mo., and to elect a professor who would

3
_
=

ae eae cod

TR lias