Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1923 · 32nd Convention, Fort Wayne › Page 83
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1923, Page 83
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
» By. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1923. 83
3, Appeal of Mr. and Mrs. Whipple. — Synod sustained the deci-
n of the Church of Our Savior, St. Paul, Minn., and of the
Raglish District, exhorting Mr. and Mrs. Whipple to recognize in
, verdict of the congregation the voice of the Lord.
4, Appeal of Mrs. Lampe of St. Louis. — Since Mrs. Lampe re-
to appear before the committee of the English District
ted to investigate her case upon her appeal to the English
trict, Synod refused to entertain the appeal and referred her to
. ‘the appointed committee of the English District.
5 Appeal of Mr. and Mrs. H. F. Pieper, Edwardsville, Iu. —
ynod’s decision of 1920 was sustained. .
6. Appeal of Pastor J. H. Fuhrmann. — The appeal was rejected.
INTERSYNODICAL MATTERS.
(Germ. Rep., p. 227.)
Since the convention at Detroit three to four meetings were
conducted. annually with representatives from the Wisconsin, Iowa,
Ohio, and Buffalo synods. Theses and antitheses have been adopted
“on the doctrine of conversion and election. Protest has also been
lodged against some of these theses (5, 12, 28, 29).
Synod resolved that a committee be appointed for the purpose
of testing these union theses. Said committee is to examine all
' objections which have so far been lodged — and shall have been
Jodged until the end of 1925 — and report its findings at the next
convention.
Whereas the Intersynodical Committee also reported that dis-
_- eussions on the older doctrinal controversies which have for so long
‘a time separated especially the Missouri, Iowa, and Buffalo synods,
have been begun, Synod resolved — ;
1. To continue the discussions and to that end again elect an
- Intersynodical Committee; ,
2. To express its joy over the fact that these earnest efforts to
get together with the other Lutheran synods are being made. Synod
hopes that by God’s grace complete unity of faith will be achieved.
; Agreement with the Norwegian Synod.
, ; (Germ. Rep., p. 229.)
The Norwegian Synod of the American Evangelical Lutheran
Church petitioned Synod for permission to send its students to Con-
cordia Seminary, St. Louis, Mo., and to elect a professor who would
3
_
=
ae eae cod
TR lias