Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1923 · 32nd Convention, Fort Wayne › Page 16

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1923, Page 16

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

_ July 20 and after considerable study was adopted. Slight changes ing
’ the arrangement of the buildings have since been made. a

16 Proceedings of Thirty-Second Regular Meeting,

4. Labrary. Stack-room; capacity, 50,000 volumes. Desk-ro,
for 100 students. Periodical-room.
5. Dormitories for 400 students.
6. Service Building. Dining-halls for 400; kitchen, bakery, ete:
quarters for employees. .
7. Twelve Professors’ Residences.

IV. Selection of Architect.

The choice of architect for the new Seminary was the first tas”

of the Committee. No less than fifty-four architects had made appli.

This task occupied the Committee from October, 1921, until February, :
1922. In February a subcommittee, consisting of Mr. A. G. Braueg:4
Mr. H. W. Horst, Rev. R. Kretzschmar, and Prof. Theo. Graebner:s
inspected the work of eleven architects who stood forth prominently:
as candidates for our work after our investigation had eliminated:
the rest. The Committee reported March 3, and:on March 7 the firm:
of Day & Klauder, Philadelphia, was unanimously selected for our:
work. Contract was made with Mr. Chas. Z. Klauder for the firm on ;
March 381. ——- .

V. Gradual Development of the Plans.

From the outset, however, the Committee was convinced that the fol:
lowing buildings would have to be constructed of such a size as to ac-
commodate an ultimate enrolment of 800: Administration Building
Assembly Hall; Library; Service Building; Heating-Plant.

_ When the Committee had reduced its program to what it held
to be an absolute minimum, a meeting was held May 25, 1922, with
Mr. Klauder, and the details of the program were determined upon
as stated above, 1—7. The cost of the first group of buildings (those'
necessary for 400 students, together with Assembly Hall, Libr.
Service Building, and Power Plant for 800) was roughly estimated
by Mr. Klauder at a total of $2,000,000. From the outset the archi-#
tect was apprised of the fact that eur appropriation was $1,000,000,
and that no contracts could at this time be entered into which would
obligate. Synod to a larger amount... ‘The Committee was not con
vinced that the first estimate of- Mr. Klauder-was more than a rough
guess and instructed the firm to develop a block plan which would
involve less expense for exterior walls. A block plan in which th
feature was embodied was submitted to the Building Commit