Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1923 · 32nd Convention, Fort Wayne › Page 16
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1923, Page 16
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
_ July 20 and after considerable study was adopted. Slight changes ing
’ the arrangement of the buildings have since been made. a
16 Proceedings of Thirty-Second Regular Meeting,
4. Labrary. Stack-room; capacity, 50,000 volumes. Desk-ro,
for 100 students. Periodical-room.
5. Dormitories for 400 students.
6. Service Building. Dining-halls for 400; kitchen, bakery, ete:
quarters for employees. .
7. Twelve Professors’ Residences.
IV. Selection of Architect.
The choice of architect for the new Seminary was the first tas”
of the Committee. No less than fifty-four architects had made appli.
This task occupied the Committee from October, 1921, until February, :
1922. In February a subcommittee, consisting of Mr. A. G. Braueg:4
Mr. H. W. Horst, Rev. R. Kretzschmar, and Prof. Theo. Graebner:s
inspected the work of eleven architects who stood forth prominently:
as candidates for our work after our investigation had eliminated:
the rest. The Committee reported March 3, and:on March 7 the firm:
of Day & Klauder, Philadelphia, was unanimously selected for our:
work. Contract was made with Mr. Chas. Z. Klauder for the firm on ;
March 381. ——- .
V. Gradual Development of the Plans.
From the outset, however, the Committee was convinced that the fol:
lowing buildings would have to be constructed of such a size as to ac-
commodate an ultimate enrolment of 800: Administration Building
Assembly Hall; Library; Service Building; Heating-Plant.
_ When the Committee had reduced its program to what it held
to be an absolute minimum, a meeting was held May 25, 1922, with
Mr. Klauder, and the details of the program were determined upon
as stated above, 1—7. The cost of the first group of buildings (those'
necessary for 400 students, together with Assembly Hall, Libr.
Service Building, and Power Plant for 800) was roughly estimated
by Mr. Klauder at a total of $2,000,000. From the outset the archi-#
tect was apprised of the fact that eur appropriation was $1,000,000,
and that no contracts could at this time be entered into which would
obligate. Synod to a larger amount... ‘The Committee was not con
vinced that the first estimate of- Mr. Klauder-was more than a rough
guess and instructed the firm to develop a block plan which would
involve less expense for exterior walls. A block plan in which th
feature was embodied was submitted to the Building Commit