Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1923 · 32nd Convention, Fort Wayne › Page 75

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1923, Page 75

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

Ey. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States, 1923. 75.

charged to the book account.. It has been rented and is now pro-
acing a reasonable revenue. —

During the last three years $4,365.73 was disbursed from the
“General Legacies account to the Synodical Treasury. This reduced
ts book value to approximately its original value of $21,000.
Regarding the Raithel farms, there exists a probability of Synod’s
losing @ substantial amount, though we are hopeful of. sparing Synod.
this loss. It is not wise here and now to discuss the details of this
probable loss, but your Legacy Officer feels that he cannot omit ref-
erence to this fact in his report.

Many years ago a practise was inaugurated to invest in bulk all
moneys coming to the Synod in the shape of legacies. In the opinion
of your Legacy Officer, supported by former boards and your Board
of Directors, this has proved not only practical, but also more pro-
ductive in the aggregate. Under this arrangement all legacies, ex-
' gepting those consisting of real estate, are now uniformly credited
with a revenue of five per cent. per annum. Investments are made by
your Legacy Officer under the control of a special investment com-
mittee appointed by your Board of Directors. Thanks are due Messrs.
A.G. Brauer and Robert H. Leonhardt for faithful and circumspect
services in this connection. Mr. John W. Boehne and other members
of the Board of Directors have also occasionally been drawn into con-
sultation. Synod’s Board of Auditors is periodically satisfying itself
’ that your Legacy Officer always keeps an ample sum productively
invested to cover all legacies under his care.

Supplementary Report.

The following Districts report that they hold or control no lega-
cies (or endowments), Church Extension Funds omitted: Atlantic,
Canada, Central Illinois, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, North
Dakota and Montana, North Wisconsin, Oregon and Washington,
Southern, Southern Illinois, Texas, Western, Colorado, Alberta and _
British Columbia, Manitoba and Saskatchewan, Northern Nebraska.

The following Districts did not report: English and South
Wisconsin. ‘
Legacies (or endowments) are held or controlled by the remain-
ing Districts as follows: —

Value. : Purpose of Proceeds.
California and Nevada District: .
_ Rev. and Mrs. W. Grunow ... $ 5804.25 Indigent students.
Central District: G. Scheiderer.. 1000.00 Indigent students.
Mrs. Zimmermann ........ fees 2000.00 Missions.

Eastern District: Simon Becker... 30000.00 Indigent students. “
John Ehrlinger ............. ; 500.08 Indigent students. :