Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2004 · 62nd Convention, St. Louis › Page 383

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2004, Page 383

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS 383

with the whole church, to choose men from among them and send
them to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas.”

The Pauline Epistles

Paul makes reference to the call of ministers in all of his epis-
tles, and especially in the greetings where as an apostle he lists
himself with Timothy and Silas who share in his ministry (Phil 1:1;
2 Cor 1:1; Col 1:1; 1 Thess 1:1; 2 Thess 1:1; cf. 1 Cor 1:1). Paul
wrote the Pastoral Epistles (1 and 2 Timothy, and Titus) primarily
to give instructions regarding the ministry and its functions, and el-
igibility for service in this office in the post-apostolic period. He
gave to Titus (1:5) the task of appointing ministers to churches that
he had established—a responsibility that he often assigned to his
co-workers (2 Tim 2:2; 1 Tim 5:21; cf. 2 Cor 8:16-19). It seems
as if the apostles and their successors (such as Titus and Timothy)
were more concerned with the qualifications of the candidates for
the ministry than they were with setting down a once-and-for-all
procedure for selecting them. Paul and his assistants took the ini-
tiative in selecting candidates and the churches testified to their
character. In this way, the whole church—pastors and people—was
involved in the selection of candidates for the ministry and guarded
against those who would usurp the office.

Summary Observations

As we summarize the biblical data that pertain to the call into
the public ministry of the Word, we can say in general the follow-
ing. First, the biblical writers give us several pictures of how the
church actually went about the process of selecting pastors in “nor-
mal,” settled situations. Second, the texts that address the issue are
largely descriptive and narrative in character. This raises the diffi-
cult hermeneutical question as to whether these texts are unique to
themselves, or whether they provide normative guidance for the
church in all times and places. In any case, however, they do not
provide any explicit directives regarding the practice of the call.
Any guidance drawn from these examples, therefore, will neces-
sarily have to be inferential.

We may further conclude that the New Testament appears to be
more concerned with the qualifications and characteristics of the
individual called to serve than with the procedure for placing him
into office. It also seems more important for the church to know
that the man who occupies the pastoral office has been placed there
by God (Acts 20:28; Ephesians 4).

The Lutheran Confessions —

The Lutheran Confessions emphasize that one must be rightly
called in order to function in the public office of the ministry, but
they do not say much about how this is to be done or what this
means. The clues they give can be illuminated by what the reform-
ers did historically. In general, the Confessions stress two points:
pastors are not self-appointed; and, bishops are not the exclusive
ones who may ordain. The Apology of the Augsburg Confession
deals primarily with the former while the Treatise on the Power
and Primacy of the Pope takes up the latter.

Augsburg Confession and Apology XIV

As we consider Article XIV of the Augsburg Confession, it is
important, first of all, to note where this Article appears within the
Confession. Articles I through VI set forth the Reformation mes-
sage based on the theology of the ancient church and her creeds.
That message then shapes the ecclesiological portion of the AC
(Articles VII through XVI). In these articles, the reformers demon-
Strate that the Lutherans were not establishing a new church, but
were making their claim to be church.'’ AC VII and VIII provide a
definition of the church as the assembly of believers gathered
around the Gospel that is preached and the sacraments adminis-
tered. Articles IX through XIII describe those sacraments together
with their purpose in arousing and strengthening faith. Article XIV

addresses the question of who preaches the Word and administers
the sacraments (IX-XIII) within the assembly (AC VII and VII).
AC XV deals with the antitheses of AC VII on churchly traditions.
AC XVI speaks of the relation of the church to the wider society.

Article XIV confesses that to‘serve within the church (that is,
in the office of the public ministry) one must be “rightly called”
(rite vocatus). This brief article, however, does not elaborate on
what the “rightly called” means or involves.

The Roman Confutation approves AC XIV, but with a stipula-
tion. The first draft of the Apology acknowledged this when it for-
mulated the Confutation’s proviso in the words, “that ordination be
performed by bishops (ut ordinatio fiat ab episcopis).” In its final
form the Apology restates this condition as follows: “as long as we
use canonical ordination (si tamen utamur ordinatione canonica).”
The Apology, however, points out that episcopal ordination is not
available to the Lutherans because Roman bishops refuse to ordain
pastors for them. The implication “is that they may have no alter-
native but to avail themselves of ordination by clergymen in pres-
byter’s orders.”'® Melanchthon would make this very point in the
Treatise. For now we note only that in 1530 “rightly called” re-
ferred to a procedure that required nomination by a medieval
bishop and the approval of local patrons, noble or municipal. This
becomes somewhat clearer in the Treatise.

Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope

Although Lutherans were not unwilling to accept ordination
from papal bishops, they were being deprived of such ordination
as a form of punishment. Melanchthon in the AC had already al-
luded to this.'® The refusal of the bishops to ordain was an attempt
to confine the spread of Lutheranism. By 1537 the situation had
become quite serious. The progress of the Reformation depended
on supplying recognized pastors for the congregations. When bish-
ops refused to ordain, the Lutherans responded that the church
could no more be deprived of pastors than it could be deprived of
preaching, Baptism, and the Lord’s Supper, or any other gift that
the Lord intended for the church (pastor and means of grace go to-
gether).

There was no question that Lutherans must have pastors. Nor
was there any doubt that they should be called and ordained. But
how do Lutherans obtain pastors? Under Roman polity, only bish-
ops could ordain. But they refused. In response to the bishops’ re-
fusal Lutherans ordained their own pastors.”° Philip Melanchthon’s
treatise is a theological rationale for Lutherans to undertake the or-
daining of their own pastors. He tackles the issue in two ways.
First, he stresses the unitary character of the ministry. Second, he
emphasizes that since every pastor possesses the full authority of
the office, any pastor may ordain. The question in the Treatise,
therefore, is this: who may call and ordain? And it should be re-
membered that the main point at issue is the authority of bishops
vs. pastors in territorial churches, not the authority of local congre-
gations vs. the pastor.

While the Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope
spoke to the question of the equality of bishops over against the
Roman claim to the supremacy of Peter as the first pope (Tr 1-59),
the supplemental and companion treatise on “The Power and Ju-
risdiction of Bishops” speaks to the equality of all clergy, bishops
and pastors (Tr 60-82). According to Roman tradition, priests
could administer five of the seven sacraments, with confirmation
and ordination reserved for the bishops.

Melanchthon does not call into question or address the issue of
the ministry’s existence by divine right (jure divino). However, he
does question the post-apostolic differentiation of grades within it
by the separation of the presbyterate from the episcopate and, by
implication, the subsequent introduction of the initially lay office of
deacon into the major orders of the sacred ministry. These devel-
opments, he insists, exist only by human right (de jure humano).”'

2004 Convention Workbook