Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2004 · 62nd Convention, St. Louis › Page 24
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2004, Page 24
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
24 . SYNODICAL REPORTS
typical non-synodically certified teacher reveals a broad mix of
Christian doctrine, including numerous elements of historic Calvin-
ism, Arminianism, and Roman Catholicism. Anecdotal research
with more than 400 non-synodically certified teachers brings to
light that most frequently the non-theologically trained teacher rep-
resents generic American Christianity. The implication is obvious:
If the teacher’s understanding of Christian doctrine is a mixture of
popular Christian thought derived from Methodism, Presbyterian-
ism, Lutheranism, Roman Catholicism, the Southern Baptists, and
other denominations, the lessons taught in school will widely miss
the goals for which our schools were established in the first place.
The long-term implication is that the cherished doctrinal heritage of
our Synod will be understood by fewer and fewer people as the
years pass, and the Lutheran school will evolve into a generic
Christian school or merely a private school as, indeed, in some
communities it already has. If this trend is to be reversed, congre-
gations must seek teachers who are synodically trained or they
must enroll their non-theologically trained teachers in the Synod’s
teacher colloquy program.
Response of the Board for Higher Education
Many decades ago the Synod’s Board for Higher Education
called for the development of a teacher colloquy education program
that would address such fundamental academic courses as Old Tes-
tament, New Testament, History of the Christian Church, the
Lutheran Confessions, Lutheran Doctrine, World Religions, and
the Office of the Lutheran Teacher. The board also insisted upon an
examination of each candidate by representatives of a synodical
college faculty. Bylaws governing the teacher colloquy program
were written and adopted by the congregations of the Synod. Early
on, non-synodically certified teachers had to travel to the campus at
River Forest or Seward to avail themselves of the program. Gradu-
ally, colloquy instruction was made available on all 10 campuses of
the Concordia colleges. As the number of non-synodically certified
teachers continued to rise rapidly during the 1970s and the 1980s,
the Board for Higher Education authorized a video-based program
that provided some but not all of the required classes off campus.
The remainder of the classes and the faculty interview had to come
from one of the Concordias. Still later, many of the Concordia cam-
puses began to send professors to larger communities to offer sum-
mer teacher colloquy classes. Occasionally the colleges authorized
local pastors to teach colloquy courses when enough teachers were
interested in enrollment to form a cohort.
While program access was somewhat improved by these
changes, three significant problems arose in conjunction with the
new designs. First, the quality of instruction became uneven. In
some instances colloquy courses were as short as two days, while
the same course offered in other instances was equal to a full se-
mester. Student performance at the end of the program displayed
wide variance. Second, financial considerations also arose. At the
urging of the Districts, colloquy courses were offered at one-third
the price of the same classes on campus. While tuition for a New
Testament course on a typical Concordia campus ran $1,400, the
Districts were requesting colloquy courses at the $350-level. Fi-
nally, access to the teacher colloquy program could not be uni-
formly provided under any of the original designs. Those Missouri
Synod congregations located close to a Concordia had reasonably
good access, while the other half of our Synod’s congregations ex-
perienced far more difficult access.
During the synodical convention of 1998, a letter calling for sig-
nificant change to the delivery system for teacher colloquy educa-
tion and signed by the education executives from three of our
Synod’s largest Districts was given to the Board for Higher Educa-
tion. The request was timely, for already nearly half of the elemen-
tary, junior high school, and high school teachers in our Synod
were not synodically certified and the number was rising LO per-
2004 Convention Workbook
cent each decade. A more effective delivery system had to be de-
signed right away.
The Board for Higher Education had recently sought and had
been awarded a grant from the Marvin M. Schwan Charitable
Foundation to establish a distance-learning arm for the Concordia
University System. Later to become known as the Concordia Uni-
versity Education Network (CUEnet), the new organization was as-
signed the task of responding to the challenge raised by the 1998
letter. CUEnet began by identifying exceptional faculty from
around the Synod to teach and record each of the colloquy classes.
Such scholars as Dr. Robert Kolb from the St. Louis seminary, Dr.
Jack Preus from Concordia University, Irvine, and Dr. Patrick
Ferry from Concordia University Wisconsin were invited to par-
ticipate along with other outstanding professors. The teaching of
these individuals was captured on digital tape, edited, and prepared
for full-video delivery over the Internet. CUEnet also sought the
assistance of all of the theology professors and librarians from
throughout the church to identify those reference volumes that
would be the most desirable to place into an electronic library.
Again with assistance from the Schwan Foundation and Concordia
Publishing House, a CD was prepared to be utilized by teacher col-
loquy students.
The program designed by CUEnet was subsequently adopted
by the colleges and universities as a counterpart to their on-cam-
pus colloquy programs. Today the Concordia University System
offers teacher colloquy classes online while continuing to offer the
same classes in standard fashion on each campus. The online pro-
gram provides each student with a full-time mentor. Lessons are
designed in such a way as to involve students in group work
through threaded discussions. Tuition for the program is less than
half the charge for an on-campus, traditional course. Evaluation of
the program has been consistently above the 90th percentile among
the more than 500 students who have participated in the online
courses. As a result, the number of non-synodically certified teach-
ers enrolled in colloquy instruction has increased, but the challenge
before the Synod remains daunting, for while the enrollment of
teachers in the colloquy program has risen as a result of the online
offering, it has not kept pace with the number of non-synodically
trained teachers being hired every year.
Evaluation of the Concordia online Teacher Colloquy Program
CUEnet conducts a thorough assessment of the Concordia on-
line Teacher Colloquy Program on a regular basis. The assessment
program includes outcomes as well as student satisfaction. The
graphs below contain some of the results of this process, chosen to
reflect the efficacy of the pedagogy utilized for the online program.
The first graph indicates student satisfaction. At the end of each
course, students are asked by CUEnet to indicate their satisfaction
with the program by anonymously responding to a survey. The
items included below are representative of the overall results,
which have been remarkably consistent across eight cycles of
course offerings.
Satisfaction overall with the program |... -
Agree, program enriched spiritual life (of the F-
teacher)
Agree, online effective method of presentation
0 10 20 3 40 50 6 70 8 9 100
Percentile
The next graph reflects the evaluation of colloquy candidates
by theology and education professors from the faculties of the Con-