Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2004 · 62nd Convention, St. Louis › Page 88
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2004, Page 88
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
88 SYNODICAL REPORTS
Scholarships and Financial Aid by Institution
For the Three Years Ending June 30, 2003
Total Estimated
Financial Financial Financiat FTE Students Average
institution Aid FY 01 Aid FY 02 Aid FY 03 Fall 2002 Aid FY 03
Ann Arbor S$ 2.207.087 $ 2.377.717 $ 2,187,587 508 $ 4,306
Austin 2,223,481 3,306,753 3,762,021 806 4,668
Bronxville 2.854.800 3,443,210 3,792,463 603 6,289
Irvine 6.635.878 6,752,691 7,442,214 1,447 5,143
Mequon 8,221,567 10.483, 176 10,633,879 3,904 2,724
Portland 4,510,691 4.484,551 4,854,161 944 5,142
River Forest 5,353,346 6,685,649 7,712,761 1,383 5,577
St, Paul 4,840,546 5,338.484 5,433,077 1,765 3,078
Selma 1,911,813 2.402.377 2,532,167 825 3,069
Seward 6.525.333 7,368,126 7.847.134 1,300 6,036
Subtotal $ 45,284,542 $ 52,642,734 $ 56,197,464 13,485 $ 4,167
Ft Wayne S$ 2,253,659 $ 2.127639 $ 2.309.789 337 $ 6,854
St. Louis 4,320.246 5.933.080 6,105,147 553 11,040
Subtotal $ 6,573,905 $ 8,060,719 $ 8,414,936 890 $ 9,455
Total/Avg $ 51,858,447 $ 60,703,453 _$ 64,612,400 14,375 $ 4,495
Church Worker Financial Aid by Institution
Awards for the Year Ending June 30, 2004
Church Work Number of Estimated
Institution Aid Total Churchworkers Avg. Aid % Total Tultion
Ann Arbor $ 1,237,185 180 $ 7,355 43%
Austin 4,027,752 115 8,937 58%
Bronxville 579,900 58 9,998 54%
Irvine 2.114,175 224 9,438 53%
Mequon 4,366,214 469 9,300 59%
Portland 647,661 60 10,576 61%
River Forest 4.173594 525 8.695 48%
St.Paul © 1,786,464 196 9,115 49%
Selma 114,086 15 7,605 100%
Seward 4,079,621 626 6516 41%
Subtotal $ 20,126,652 2,468 $ 8,155 57%
Cuenet $ 43,500 182 $ 239
Ft. Wayne $ 1,644,632 222 $ 7,408 71%
St. Louis $5,100,187 514 9,922 75%
Subtotal $6,744,819 736 $ 8,665 73%
Total/Avg $ 26,871,471 3,204 $ 7,994 59%
Institutional Endowment Funds
For the Three Years Ending June 30, 2003
$120,000
ry $95,435
& $100,000 $82,436 $86,337 :
2 — $80,000 . .
£ $60,000 $45,010 $46,468 $49,523
3 $40,000 ° °
< $20,000 .
$-
2001 2002 2003
¢ Colleges & Universites * Seminaries
Institutional Operations Summary
During the past three years the Board for Higher Education fo-
cused attention on cooperation among the campuses, collaboration
with related educational support groups, and a renewed commit-
ment to enhancing the spiritual life of both students and faculties on
each campus. While these objectives are difficult to measure with
Statistical accuracy, it is evident in the life of the institutions (col-
leges/universities/seminaries) that cooperation in planning, opera-
tional procedures, and mutual support continue to characterize
campus life. The effect of this cooperative spirit is evidenced by
both public recognition for the LCMS system of higher education
and generous financial support of the underlying activities.
In addition it must be said the past three years were a signifi-
cant challenge to the operation of the institutions. The economic
2004 Convention Workbook
downtum in American society reduced available earnings from en-
dowment funds to support student financial aid. At the same time
the institutions continued to provide approximately $27 million in
financial assistance to students annually. However, our educational
institutions managed their operations efficiently enough to sustain
the downturn. The latest financial reports from the institutional au-
dits indicate that the educational institutions have met the economic
challenge.
The BHE/CUS Board authorized a study of the future of colle-
giate education. A think tank group participated in a four-phase
study of what the future of higher education in the LCMS can and
should be. The think tank recommendations include maintaining
the present 10 colleges/universities as regional institutions, in-
creasing the number of Board of Regent appointees as members of
the Board of Regents, establishing a set of criteria (absolutes) that
each institution must annually fulfill as an educational institution
of higher learning in the LCMS centered around four categories:
(1) Christ Centered and Lutheran; (2) Church Work Programs; (3)
Quest for Quality; and (4) Ongoing Viability. The BHE/CUS
Board, after careful study, adopted these recommendations and has
presented them in a memorial to the convention.
The BHE/CUS Board is pleased to share with the members of
the LCMS that the operational expenses of the institutions are sup-
ported by tuition and gift revenue and all capital indebtedness is
amortized within prescribed limits. Overall enrollment has in-
creased 7 percent during the past three years. Student enrollment
for those preparing for ministry at the colleges and universities re-
mains steady.
More important than the numbers and measurable results is the
dedication and commitment of faculties and staffs to serve the
LCMS in this special educational ministry. Preparation of church
workers remains the focus of all campuses. At the same time, ex-
tensive effort and energy is devoted to offering a greater variety of
programs within a Lutheran context. The BHE/CUS firmly believes
Lutheran education must emphasize the confessional principle we
hold near and dear as Lutherans—“we believe, teach, and con-
fess”—the mark of our distinctive heritage.
It is the intent of the BHE/CUS Board to build on the present di-
rection and trends in LCMS education to achieve four specific results:
(1) to strengthen the fiscal base of each institution with a substantial
endowment; (2) to embrace technology as a tool to deliver education;
(3) to enhance pastoral formation with significant involvement in min-
istry contexts; and (4) to focus on recruiting students preparing for
church work professions. The challenges remain the same—afford-
able education, cooperative spirit, student recruitment, skilled leader-
ship, and member ownership and support.
[af
The mission and purpose of LCMS pastoral education was
adopted by the Board for Higher Education in October 2002.
The Mission
Pastoral Education
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod seminaries—Concor-
dia Seminary and Concordia Theological Seminary—prepare pas-
tors, missionaries, and leaders for the church by providing theo-
logical education and leadership development centered in the
Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ as proclaimed in Holy Scripture
and confessed in the Book of Concord.
The Purpose
The Board for Higher Education coordinates and monitors pas-
toral education activity under the auspices of the Committee for