Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2004 · 62nd Convention, St. Louis › Page 213

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2004, Page 213

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

PROGRAM AND FINANCE 213

4-22

To Provide Process for Determining Seminary
Assistance Assessments

WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in conven-
tion (Res. 5-02A, 1995) directed that the Board for Higher Educa-
tion and the seminaries of our Synod increase the student aid en-
dowments fund for seminarians and that it set as a goal the
“Gntegrating of funds sufficient to cover the cost of all tuition for
every student enrolled in the seminaries” who are preparing for the
pastoral ministry; and

WHEREAS, The seminaries have experienced increasing costs to
provide seminary education, while at the same time endowment in-
vestments and other income sources have not kept pace with the
cost of providing education; and

WHEREAS, The seminaries have been notifying both seminari-
ans’ home Districts and congregations of increasingly greater re-
sponsibilities on their parts toward the cost of the seminarians’ tu-
ition ($1,600 each for the home District and congregation for
2002-2003; $2,000 each for 2003-2004; and $3,000 for
2004-2005); and

” WHEREAS, The seminaries have communicated to the seminar-
ian, the seminarian’s home Districts, and the seminarian’s home
congregation that any shortfall of the District’s or home congrega-
tion’s assessments will become the responsibility of the seminar-
ian; and

WHEREAS, This current practice of the seminaries is in contra-
diction to the intent of the direction of the Synod in convention
(Res. 5-02, 1995), whose intent was to remove the burden of tu-
ition expenses from the seminarians; therefore be it

Resolved, That all tuition assistance assessments to Districts and
the seminarians’ home congregations be determined by a commit-
tee including two representatives from each of the following enti-
ties: (1) the Board for Higher Education, (2) each of the seminaries,
and (3) the Council of Presidents; and be it further

Resolved, That notification of increased assessments to semi-
narians’ home Districts and home congregations be given with suf-
ficient advance notice so that the Districts and home congregations
can incorporate such assessments into their annual budgets or work
program in a timely fashion.

Board of Directors
South Dakota District

To Commit to Financial Support
for Colleges, Universities, and Seminaries

WHEREAS, Properly trained pastors are needed to serve new and
vacant congregations; and

WHEREAS, Ordained pastors are needed for Word and Sacra-
ment ministry; and

WHEREAS, The financial burden of attending a seminary may
keep men from pursuing the pastoral ministry; and

WHEREAS, Financial constraints at the Synod level have dimin-
ished the financial support the Synod provides to the seminaries;
and

WHEREAS, Art. III of the Constitution states that one of the
Synod’s objectives is to recruit and train pastors, teachers, and
other professional church workers and provide for their continuing
growth; and

WHEREAS, Art. III of the Constitution also states that one of the
Synod’s objectives is to support synodical colleges, universities,
and seminaries; and

WHEREAS, Financial constraints require the establishment of pri-
ority spending; therefore be it

Resolved, That the Synod reconsider programs that usurp fi-
nancial resources that could be used to recruit and train pastors,

teachers, and other professional church workers and provide for
their continuing growth; and be it further
Resolved, That the Synod make it a financial commitment to
support synodical colleges, universities, and seminaries.
Mount Calvary
Brookings, SD

4-24

To Increase Support and Staffing for Hispanic Ministry

WHEREAS, The Lord of the harvest has seen fit to increase sig-
nificantly the numbers of Hispanics in a great number of our na-
tion’s cities and communities; and

WHEREAS, Many of these Hispanics do not have a saving rela-
tionship with the Lord Jesus Christ; and

WHEREAS, Most of our congregations are ill-equipped to evan-
gelize this population effectively; and

WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod through its
Board for Higher Education has reduced funding for the training
of Hispanic workers; therefore be it

Resolved, That we recommit ourselves to Hispanic ministry at a
regional, District, and Synod level; and be it further
Resolved, That the Northern Illinois District petition the 2004
LCMS convention to increase support and staffing for the training
and directing of church planters, pastors, and other church work-
ers among Hispanics.
Northern Illinois District

4-25

To Restore Support of Hispanic Institute of Theology

WHEREAS, Fifty percent of the funding ($150,000) provided for
the operation of the Hispanic Institute of Theology was eliminated
by the Board for Higher Education; and

WHEREAS, The Hispanic Institute of Theology is one of the
main routes for the preparation of [Hispanic] pastors and dea-
conesses within The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod; and

WHEREAS, The Hispanic population in the United States exceeds
37 million people and our Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod lacks
workers that are able to work within this population; therefore be it

Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in con-
vention request the Board of Directors and the Board for Higher
Education to restore permanently the funds that were cut from the
budget of the Hispanic Institute of Theology.

Iglesia Luterana Nazaret, Philadelphia, PA; Faith, Cicero,
IL; Christ the Life, San Jose, CA; Principe De Paz, Lorain,
OH; Prince of Peace, Hollywood, FL; Miramar, Miramar,
FL; Christ Our King, Morgan Hill, CA; Our Redeemer,
Irving, TX; First Immanuel, San Jose, CA; St. Matthew,
Miami, FL

4-26

To Emphasize Firstfruits Proportionate Giving

WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod perennially
struggles with meeting its budget; and

Whereas, District and congregational giving to the Synod bud-
get have declined in recent years; and

WHEREAS, Synod leaders are examining the requirement of the
Districts to give their “fair share” to sponsor “core services” of the
Synod offices; and

WHEREAS, Synod leaders are examining a business model that
assesses all entities of the Synod, that requires money contributed
by congregations be deposited with the Synod and then be allo-
cated to the Districts and other ministries of the Synod; and