Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2004 · 62nd Convention, St. Louis › Page 213
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2004, Page 213
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
PROGRAM AND FINANCE 213
4-22
To Provide Process for Determining Seminary
Assistance Assessments
WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in conven-
tion (Res. 5-02A, 1995) directed that the Board for Higher Educa-
tion and the seminaries of our Synod increase the student aid en-
dowments fund for seminarians and that it set as a goal the
“Gntegrating of funds sufficient to cover the cost of all tuition for
every student enrolled in the seminaries” who are preparing for the
pastoral ministry; and
WHEREAS, The seminaries have experienced increasing costs to
provide seminary education, while at the same time endowment in-
vestments and other income sources have not kept pace with the
cost of providing education; and
WHEREAS, The seminaries have been notifying both seminari-
ans’ home Districts and congregations of increasingly greater re-
sponsibilities on their parts toward the cost of the seminarians’ tu-
ition ($1,600 each for the home District and congregation for
2002-2003; $2,000 each for 2003-2004; and $3,000 for
2004-2005); and
” WHEREAS, The seminaries have communicated to the seminar-
ian, the seminarian’s home Districts, and the seminarian’s home
congregation that any shortfall of the District’s or home congrega-
tion’s assessments will become the responsibility of the seminar-
ian; and
WHEREAS, This current practice of the seminaries is in contra-
diction to the intent of the direction of the Synod in convention
(Res. 5-02, 1995), whose intent was to remove the burden of tu-
ition expenses from the seminarians; therefore be it
Resolved, That all tuition assistance assessments to Districts and
the seminarians’ home congregations be determined by a commit-
tee including two representatives from each of the following enti-
ties: (1) the Board for Higher Education, (2) each of the seminaries,
and (3) the Council of Presidents; and be it further
Resolved, That notification of increased assessments to semi-
narians’ home Districts and home congregations be given with suf-
ficient advance notice so that the Districts and home congregations
can incorporate such assessments into their annual budgets or work
program in a timely fashion.
Board of Directors
South Dakota District
To Commit to Financial Support
for Colleges, Universities, and Seminaries
WHEREAS, Properly trained pastors are needed to serve new and
vacant congregations; and
WHEREAS, Ordained pastors are needed for Word and Sacra-
ment ministry; and
WHEREAS, The financial burden of attending a seminary may
keep men from pursuing the pastoral ministry; and
WHEREAS, Financial constraints at the Synod level have dimin-
ished the financial support the Synod provides to the seminaries;
and
WHEREAS, Art. III of the Constitution states that one of the
Synod’s objectives is to recruit and train pastors, teachers, and
other professional church workers and provide for their continuing
growth; and
WHEREAS, Art. III of the Constitution also states that one of the
Synod’s objectives is to support synodical colleges, universities,
and seminaries; and
WHEREAS, Financial constraints require the establishment of pri-
ority spending; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Synod reconsider programs that usurp fi-
nancial resources that could be used to recruit and train pastors,
teachers, and other professional church workers and provide for
their continuing growth; and be it further
Resolved, That the Synod make it a financial commitment to
support synodical colleges, universities, and seminaries.
Mount Calvary
Brookings, SD
4-24
To Increase Support and Staffing for Hispanic Ministry
WHEREAS, The Lord of the harvest has seen fit to increase sig-
nificantly the numbers of Hispanics in a great number of our na-
tion’s cities and communities; and
WHEREAS, Many of these Hispanics do not have a saving rela-
tionship with the Lord Jesus Christ; and
WHEREAS, Most of our congregations are ill-equipped to evan-
gelize this population effectively; and
WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod through its
Board for Higher Education has reduced funding for the training
of Hispanic workers; therefore be it
Resolved, That we recommit ourselves to Hispanic ministry at a
regional, District, and Synod level; and be it further
Resolved, That the Northern Illinois District petition the 2004
LCMS convention to increase support and staffing for the training
and directing of church planters, pastors, and other church work-
ers among Hispanics.
Northern Illinois District
4-25
To Restore Support of Hispanic Institute of Theology
WHEREAS, Fifty percent of the funding ($150,000) provided for
the operation of the Hispanic Institute of Theology was eliminated
by the Board for Higher Education; and
WHEREAS, The Hispanic Institute of Theology is one of the
main routes for the preparation of [Hispanic] pastors and dea-
conesses within The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod; and
WHEREAS, The Hispanic population in the United States exceeds
37 million people and our Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod lacks
workers that are able to work within this population; therefore be it
Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in con-
vention request the Board of Directors and the Board for Higher
Education to restore permanently the funds that were cut from the
budget of the Hispanic Institute of Theology.
Iglesia Luterana Nazaret, Philadelphia, PA; Faith, Cicero,
IL; Christ the Life, San Jose, CA; Principe De Paz, Lorain,
OH; Prince of Peace, Hollywood, FL; Miramar, Miramar,
FL; Christ Our King, Morgan Hill, CA; Our Redeemer,
Irving, TX; First Immanuel, San Jose, CA; St. Matthew,
Miami, FL
4-26
To Emphasize Firstfruits Proportionate Giving
WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod perennially
struggles with meeting its budget; and
Whereas, District and congregational giving to the Synod bud-
get have declined in recent years; and
WHEREAS, Synod leaders are examining the requirement of the
Districts to give their “fair share” to sponsor “core services” of the
Synod offices; and
WHEREAS, Synod leaders are examining a business model that
assesses all entities of the Synod, that requires money contributed
by congregations be deposited with the Synod and then be allo-
cated to the Districts and other ministries of the Synod; and