Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2004 · 62nd Convention, St. Louis › Page 70
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2004, Page 70
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
70 SYNODICAL REPORTS
tering an “Information desk” to continue to provide information
and guidance on societies, lodges, cults, and religious organiza-
tions, and that a three-member “advisory panel” be appointed to
provide resources in this area. Appointed to this advisory pane}
were: Rev. Larry Nichols, Dr. Victor Raj, and Rev. Eldon Winker.
I. Theology
A. Assignments Completed
1. Theology and Practice of “the Divine Call”
In 1992, the Synod requested that the CTCR, “in consultation with
the Council of Presidents and representatives of the Synod’s terminal
schools,” prepare a single document that answers questions and con-
cerns regarding “the theology and practice of ‘the divine call,’ utilizing
the writings of C. F.W. Walther (i.e., his book Church and Ministry
and essay ‘The Congregation’s Right to Choose Its Pastor’).” The
Synod specifically asked the Commission to address the practices—
together with their theological foundations—for the placing of indi-
viduals into, or removing them from, their office or location of ser-
vice. The Synod mentioned issues such as the “initial placement of
candidates, dismissal from office, retirement, the appropriateness of
the term divine cail for those serving in elected and appointed offices,
etc.” At its February 2003 meeting, the Commission, after it had shared
with the COP a draft of its report and had discussed it with the Coun-
cil in a joint meeting, adopted Theology and Practice of “the Divine
Call” for distribution to the members of the Synod—pending the pos-
sible reception and inclusion of minority opinions at the April 2003
meeting. At the April meeting a minority opinion signed by Dr. Kurt
Marquart and Pastor Walter Lehenbauer, and another by Mr. Paul Nus
were received. Theology and Practice of “the Divine Call” and the
minority opinions are included in Appendix II in the Convention Work-
book. They are also available online at www.Icms.org/ctcr/.
2. Guidelines for Participation in Civic Events
In its report to the 2001 convention the CTCR included “The
Lutheran Understanding of Church Fellowship [2000}: A Report
on Synodical Discussions” (see 2001 Workbook, 48-51) prepared
by the Commission and the President of the Synod. In this report on
Synodical discussions, the Commission and the President provided
guidance regarding ‘Cases of Discretion,” including participation
in “civic events.” Following the September 11, 2001, attack on the
World Trade Center towers in New York and the Pentagon, and
ensuing events, President Kieschnick reported to the Commission
that guidelines regarding participation in “civic events” were
needed. At the Commission’s November 2001 meeting, the Presi-
dent asked the Commission to take up the topic, answering three
questions: (1) What constitutes a “civic event”? (2) What are the
implications of the two kingdoms doctrine for participation in civic
events? (3) What guidelines can be given to those who determine
that it is possible to participate in such events? The Commission
completed a draft of this report at its December 2003 meeting and
forwarded it to the Council of Presidents for input. At its February
2004 meeting the Commission continued work on its draft, taking
into account input received from the COP, and asked that this re-
vised draft-in-process be shared with the members of the Council
for their further response as the Commission prepares for its April
19-21, 2004, meeting—at which time the Commission intends to
adopt its report in keeping with its assignment to present it to the
2004 convention.
3. Women in Combat
At its November 2001 meeting the Commission placed on its
agenda a request from President Kieschnick to study issues sur-
rounding the drafting of women to serve in the military, and specif-
ically in combat. Upon the recommendation of the standing com-
mittee working on this assignment, the Commission arranged for
the publication of two articles in The Lutheran Witness (May 2003,
2004 Convention Workbook
pp. 16-20) by Dr. Leroy Vogel and Rev. David Wollenburg pre-
senting contrasting perspectives on this issue.
4. Cloning
In 1998 Res. 3-15B “To Request Commission on Theology and
Church Relations Study Document on Issues Raised by Cloning,”
the Synod asked the Commission to prepare “‘a study document to
help the church, on the basis of the Word of God, make informed
judgments concerning cloning and attendant issues.” At its April
2002 meeting the Commission adopted for distribution to the con-
gregations, pastors, and other rostered workers of the Synod a re-
port titled What Child Is This? Marriage, Family and Human
Cloning. The report is included in Appendix II of the Workbook
and is available online at www.Icms.org/ctcr/. In response to a re-
quest from the Hispanic Institute of Theology, the Commission has
requested in turn that the Institute prepare a Spanish translation of
What Child Is This?
5. Review of “That They May Be One”
In June 2002, the Council of Presidents forwarded to the Com-
mission a request adopted at its April 23, 2002, meeting that the
CTCR study the document “That They May Be One,” and make
an evaluation as to whether or not the document “adequately and
correctly gives expression to the doctrinal position of the Synod.”
The Council informed the Commission that the authors and dis-
tributors of the document had requested from the Council an ex-
amination of it. The Council in turn informed them that such an ex-
amination more properly belonged to the CTCR. At its February
2004 meeting the Commission adopted its review of “That They
May Be One.” This review was forwarded to the Council of Presi-
dents. (Notice has been served that a proposed minority opinion
has been submitted to the Commission for review.) The Commis-
sion’s review is available online at www.lcms.org/ctcr/ and is in-
cluded in Appendix II of the Workbook.
6. Review of For the Sake of Christ’s Commission
In a memo dated June 19, 2002, the President of the Synod re-
quested the CTCR to “review the document titled For the Sake of
Christ’s Commission, a report of the Church Growth Study Com-
mittee, study the document thoroughly, and report its conclusions
to me and to the church no later than the 2004 Synodical Conven-
tion.” At its December 2003 meeting the Commission adopted its
review of this document for submission to the President. (Notice has
been served that a proposed minority opinion has been submitted to
the Commission for review.) The review is included in Appendix II
of the Workbook and is available online at www.Icms.org/ctcr/.
7. Question Regarding the Identity of Michael the Archangel of
Revelation 12
The President of the South Wisconsin District, in October 2002,
requested from the Commission “‘a reaction, as well as biblical and
confessional insight and response” to questions being raised by pas-
tors in his District regarding the identity of “Michael the Archangel
of Revelation 12.” Upon the recommendation of the CTCR stand-
ing committee given responsibility for this assignment, and with
. the approval of the SW District President, the Commission at its
September 2003 meeting removed this item from its agenda on the
grounds that pertinent resources already address this question.
8. Referral of 2001 Overture 3-136 on Privileged Communication
The 2001 convention referred Overture 3-136 “To Expand
Guidelines re Pastoral Care Privileged Communication” to the
CTCR. The overture requested that the CTCR “clarify the respon-
sibilities of District officials in handling the confidential/privileged
information of professional church workers.” At its September
2002 meeting the Commission adopted the following statement in