Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2004 · 62nd Convention, St. Louis › Page 70

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2004, Page 70

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

70 SYNODICAL REPORTS

tering an “Information desk” to continue to provide information
and guidance on societies, lodges, cults, and religious organiza-
tions, and that a three-member “advisory panel” be appointed to
provide resources in this area. Appointed to this advisory pane}
were: Rev. Larry Nichols, Dr. Victor Raj, and Rev. Eldon Winker.

I. Theology
A. Assignments Completed
1. Theology and Practice of “the Divine Call”

In 1992, the Synod requested that the CTCR, “in consultation with
the Council of Presidents and representatives of the Synod’s terminal
schools,” prepare a single document that answers questions and con-
cerns regarding “the theology and practice of ‘the divine call,’ utilizing
the writings of C. F.W. Walther (i.e., his book Church and Ministry
and essay ‘The Congregation’s Right to Choose Its Pastor’).” The
Synod specifically asked the Commission to address the practices—
together with their theological foundations—for the placing of indi-
viduals into, or removing them from, their office or location of ser-
vice. The Synod mentioned issues such as the “initial placement of
candidates, dismissal from office, retirement, the appropriateness of
the term divine cail for those serving in elected and appointed offices,
etc.” At its February 2003 meeting, the Commission, after it had shared
with the COP a draft of its report and had discussed it with the Coun-
cil in a joint meeting, adopted Theology and Practice of “the Divine
Call” for distribution to the members of the Synod—pending the pos-
sible reception and inclusion of minority opinions at the April 2003
meeting. At the April meeting a minority opinion signed by Dr. Kurt
Marquart and Pastor Walter Lehenbauer, and another by Mr. Paul Nus
were received. Theology and Practice of “the Divine Call” and the
minority opinions are included in Appendix II in the Convention Work-
book. They are also available online at www.Icms.org/ctcr/.

2. Guidelines for Participation in Civic Events

In its report to the 2001 convention the CTCR included “The
Lutheran Understanding of Church Fellowship [2000}: A Report
on Synodical Discussions” (see 2001 Workbook, 48-51) prepared
by the Commission and the President of the Synod. In this report on
Synodical discussions, the Commission and the President provided
guidance regarding ‘Cases of Discretion,” including participation
in “civic events.” Following the September 11, 2001, attack on the
World Trade Center towers in New York and the Pentagon, and
ensuing events, President Kieschnick reported to the Commission
that guidelines regarding participation in “civic events” were
needed. At the Commission’s November 2001 meeting, the Presi-
dent asked the Commission to take up the topic, answering three
questions: (1) What constitutes a “civic event”? (2) What are the
implications of the two kingdoms doctrine for participation in civic
events? (3) What guidelines can be given to those who determine
that it is possible to participate in such events? The Commission
completed a draft of this report at its December 2003 meeting and
forwarded it to the Council of Presidents for input. At its February
2004 meeting the Commission continued work on its draft, taking
into account input received from the COP, and asked that this re-
vised draft-in-process be shared with the members of the Council
for their further response as the Commission prepares for its April
19-21, 2004, meeting—at which time the Commission intends to
adopt its report in keeping with its assignment to present it to the
2004 convention.

3. Women in Combat

At its November 2001 meeting the Commission placed on its
agenda a request from President Kieschnick to study issues sur-
rounding the drafting of women to serve in the military, and specif-
ically in combat. Upon the recommendation of the standing com-
mittee working on this assignment, the Commission arranged for
the publication of two articles in The Lutheran Witness (May 2003,

2004 Convention Workbook

pp. 16-20) by Dr. Leroy Vogel and Rev. David Wollenburg pre-
senting contrasting perspectives on this issue.

4. Cloning

In 1998 Res. 3-15B “To Request Commission on Theology and
Church Relations Study Document on Issues Raised by Cloning,”
the Synod asked the Commission to prepare “‘a study document to
help the church, on the basis of the Word of God, make informed
judgments concerning cloning and attendant issues.” At its April
2002 meeting the Commission adopted for distribution to the con-
gregations, pastors, and other rostered workers of the Synod a re-
port titled What Child Is This? Marriage, Family and Human
Cloning. The report is included in Appendix II of the Workbook
and is available online at www.Icms.org/ctcr/. In response to a re-
quest from the Hispanic Institute of Theology, the Commission has
requested in turn that the Institute prepare a Spanish translation of
What Child Is This?

5. Review of “That They May Be One”

In June 2002, the Council of Presidents forwarded to the Com-
mission a request adopted at its April 23, 2002, meeting that the
CTCR study the document “That They May Be One,” and make
an evaluation as to whether or not the document “adequately and
correctly gives expression to the doctrinal position of the Synod.”
The Council informed the Commission that the authors and dis-
tributors of the document had requested from the Council an ex-
amination of it. The Council in turn informed them that such an ex-
amination more properly belonged to the CTCR. At its February
2004 meeting the Commission adopted its review of “That They
May Be One.” This review was forwarded to the Council of Presi-
dents. (Notice has been served that a proposed minority opinion
has been submitted to the Commission for review.) The Commis-
sion’s review is available online at www.lcms.org/ctcr/ and is in-
cluded in Appendix II of the Workbook.

6. Review of For the Sake of Christ’s Commission

In a memo dated June 19, 2002, the President of the Synod re-
quested the CTCR to “review the document titled For the Sake of
Christ’s Commission, a report of the Church Growth Study Com-
mittee, study the document thoroughly, and report its conclusions
to me and to the church no later than the 2004 Synodical Conven-
tion.” At its December 2003 meeting the Commission adopted its
review of this document for submission to the President. (Notice has
been served that a proposed minority opinion has been submitted to
the Commission for review.) The review is included in Appendix II
of the Workbook and is available online at www.Icms.org/ctcr/.

7. Question Regarding the Identity of Michael the Archangel of
Revelation 12

The President of the South Wisconsin District, in October 2002,
requested from the Commission “‘a reaction, as well as biblical and
confessional insight and response” to questions being raised by pas-
tors in his District regarding the identity of “Michael the Archangel
of Revelation 12.” Upon the recommendation of the CTCR stand-
ing committee given responsibility for this assignment, and with

. the approval of the SW District President, the Commission at its

September 2003 meeting removed this item from its agenda on the
grounds that pertinent resources already address this question.

8. Referral of 2001 Overture 3-136 on Privileged Communication

The 2001 convention referred Overture 3-136 “To Expand
Guidelines re Pastoral Care Privileged Communication” to the
CTCR. The overture requested that the CTCR “clarify the respon-
sibilities of District officials in handling the confidential/privileged
information of professional church workers.” At its September
2002 meeting the Commission adopted the following statement in