Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2004 · 62nd Convention, St. Louis › Page 105

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2004, Page 105

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

SYNODICAL REPORTS 105

ters, and the administrator of the Synod’s dispute resolution

process, require significant amounts of time and attention. The ad-

vent of the convention of the Synod every three years also requires
large amounts of time and energy as the Secretary’s Office works
with the Committee for Convention Nominations to prepare for the

Synod’s elections and with Concordia Publishing House to produce

this Convention Workbook and other convention publications.

Other responsibilities add variety to the life of the Secretary of
the Synod, including membership on the Board of Governors of
Concordia Historical Institute, on the Commission on Structure,
and on the KFUO Radio Committee. So also does providing staff
support to the Council of Presidents, working closely with the Ros-
ters and Statistics Department to maintain the official Synod ros-
ters, and participating in numerous other committees and responsi-
bilities in and around the International Center.

All of this activity, although quite removed from the parish min-
istry, is still a wonderful and very interesting opportunity to serve
our Lord and His church. When elected to this position 6 years ago,
after having served 10 years as a District President and 17 years as
a parish pastor, it was suggested to me more than once that life as
the Secretary of the Synod would seem pretty bland and unevent-
ful. But such has not been the case, even when taking only the day-
to-day responsibilities of the office into consideration. Add to that

_ the new assignments, expectations, and challenges of every trien-
nium, and the end result has been another three eventful years for
the Office of the Secretary.

Among those new assignments, expectations, and challenges
were the following:

* Service as the secretary of the Pro Tem Commission on Struc-
ture: The 2001 convention asked the Commission to continue its
work on a comprehensive revision of the Handbook of the Synod.
Countless hours on the part of the members of the Commission
and especially the Secretary’s Office have gone into the proposed
revised version of the Handbook that the Commission is propos-
ing to this convention for adoption.

Service as one of the Synod’s representatives for discussions with
leaders of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America: Regular
semiannual sharing meetings as well as a new series of theologi-
cal discussions have provided opportunity to address issues of
mutual interest in a frank but cordial manner with fellow Chris-
tians with whom we share the name “Lutheran.”
Service as the editor of The Lutheran Annual: During this trien-
nium the decision was made to revamp the Annual to include dif-
ferent information, including e-mail addresses, Web site infor-
mation, and membership and worship attendance statistics, using
an improved user-friendly format.

Service as the administrator of our Synod’s dispute resolution
process: These past three years have put the process to the test
with high-profile cases that generated attention and scrutiny from
all quarters under quite extreme conditions. While satisfaction
with the outcome of the process often varies, particularly when
panels become involved, and while specific areas of the process
beg corrective attention after the test of the past three years, the
process does provide an orderly manner for addressing even
highly volatile cases.

Service as the “Keeper of the Bylaws”: The highly increased use
of electronic mail has added a new expectation to this office,
namely, timely response to a regular stream of e-mailed questions
and concerned comments regarding the Synod’s Articles of In-
corporation, Constitution, Bylaws, and other official documents.
While e-mail is a marvelous new means for communication, it
also has created expectations for timely reply that consume a por-
tion of every day in the Secretary’s Office.

May God now bless us with His guidance and wisdom, enabling
our Synod to come together to conduct its business constructively
and to address the concerns that trouble our life and walk together
in a peaceful and helpful manner.

Raymond L. Hartwig, Secretary

R7-03

Vice-President-Finance—Treasurer/
Chief Financial Officer

The Vice-President-Finance—Treasurer of The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod (the Synod) serves as the Chief Finan-
cial Officer (CFO) in administrating the financial affairs of the
Synod. The duties of the CFO are carried out in accordance with
the rules and regulations adopted by the Synod and as directed by
the Board of Directors of the Synod. I believe all my activities as
CFO have been consistent with this requirement.

During this last triennium, there were external influences that
directly impacted the finances of the Synod. A stock market in de-
cline for nearly three years had a significant negative effect on the
operating income of the Synod and many of its entities. The bear
market also had an adverse effect on the personal wealth of indi-
viduals and the income of charitable foundations, thus limiting their
ability to make charitable contributions. Further, the events of Sep-
tember 11, as well as Enron-type corporate scandals, have in-
creased the costs of managing risk (insurance). These external in-
fluences have had a definite impact on the finances of the Synod.

The Synod’s budgeted revenue for the year ended June 30, 2001,
was $90,257,000 of which $25,000,000 was unrestricted. In the bud-
get for the year ended June 30, 2004, budgeted revenues had de-
creased to $77,400,000, with unrestricted contributions of
$22,000,000. Fortunately, the Synod was not required to incur debt
or dispose of assets because of this shortfall in revenues. However,
the Synod was forced to deplete its reserves and reduce funding to
national ministries. While all national ministries have been adversely
affected by the decrease in the Synod’s revenue, missions, seminaries,
universities, and colleges have been most severely impacted.

During the past several years, the Board for Mission Services
has found it necessary to reduce its annual budget from
$32,000,000 to $26,000,000. In achieving a balanced budget, it was
forced to reduce the number of career missionaries from 100 to 68.
When family members of the missionaries are considered, 125 peo-
ple were affected by the reduction. In addition, the mission staff
residents in St. Louis were reduced from 68 to 34 people.

In 1992, subsidy payments from the Synod to the seminaries,
colleges, and universities (schools) approximated $10,000,000.
With the decrease in the Synod’s revenues, the payment of an an-
nual subsidy by the Synod to the schools was gradually eliminated,
with the fiscal year ending June 30, 2001, being the last year of
subsidy. Also, in the past, the Board for Higher Education/Concor-
dia University System (BHE/CUS) paid one half of property- and
liability-insurance premiums and one half of the audit fees for the
schools. These payments, which approximated $1,900,000, had to
be eliminated entirely during the current fiscal year.

With such cutbacks necessary to achieve a balanced budget, the
church body must now decide if it wants to continue its national
ministries through the historical precedent of centralized direction
by the Synod. In order to do so, the Synod must endorse a method
of funding that will ensure that these ministries have sufficient rev-
enues to operate. The Mid-South and the Southeastern Districts
have referred to this convention two funding proposals. The Board
of Directors of the Synod will continue to evaluate a variety of
funding methods.

In addition to reviewing and evaluating funding methods, it is
important that the Synod determine if it is using its assets in an ef-
ficient manner both functionally and economically. In so doing, our
church body should ask questions such as these:

* How many colleges and universities are needed to accomplish the
ministry?

¢ If Districts were consolidated, could they accomplish their min-
istries effectively? Would infrastructure costs be reduced?

2004 Convention Workbook