Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2004 · 62nd Convention, St. Louis › Page 105
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2004, Page 105
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
SYNODICAL REPORTS 105
ters, and the administrator of the Synod’s dispute resolution
process, require significant amounts of time and attention. The ad-
vent of the convention of the Synod every three years also requires
large amounts of time and energy as the Secretary’s Office works
with the Committee for Convention Nominations to prepare for the
Synod’s elections and with Concordia Publishing House to produce
this Convention Workbook and other convention publications.
Other responsibilities add variety to the life of the Secretary of
the Synod, including membership on the Board of Governors of
Concordia Historical Institute, on the Commission on Structure,
and on the KFUO Radio Committee. So also does providing staff
support to the Council of Presidents, working closely with the Ros-
ters and Statistics Department to maintain the official Synod ros-
ters, and participating in numerous other committees and responsi-
bilities in and around the International Center.
All of this activity, although quite removed from the parish min-
istry, is still a wonderful and very interesting opportunity to serve
our Lord and His church. When elected to this position 6 years ago,
after having served 10 years as a District President and 17 years as
a parish pastor, it was suggested to me more than once that life as
the Secretary of the Synod would seem pretty bland and unevent-
ful. But such has not been the case, even when taking only the day-
to-day responsibilities of the office into consideration. Add to that
_ the new assignments, expectations, and challenges of every trien-
nium, and the end result has been another three eventful years for
the Office of the Secretary.
Among those new assignments, expectations, and challenges
were the following:
* Service as the secretary of the Pro Tem Commission on Struc-
ture: The 2001 convention asked the Commission to continue its
work on a comprehensive revision of the Handbook of the Synod.
Countless hours on the part of the members of the Commission
and especially the Secretary’s Office have gone into the proposed
revised version of the Handbook that the Commission is propos-
ing to this convention for adoption.
Service as one of the Synod’s representatives for discussions with
leaders of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America: Regular
semiannual sharing meetings as well as a new series of theologi-
cal discussions have provided opportunity to address issues of
mutual interest in a frank but cordial manner with fellow Chris-
tians with whom we share the name “Lutheran.”
Service as the editor of The Lutheran Annual: During this trien-
nium the decision was made to revamp the Annual to include dif-
ferent information, including e-mail addresses, Web site infor-
mation, and membership and worship attendance statistics, using
an improved user-friendly format.
Service as the administrator of our Synod’s dispute resolution
process: These past three years have put the process to the test
with high-profile cases that generated attention and scrutiny from
all quarters under quite extreme conditions. While satisfaction
with the outcome of the process often varies, particularly when
panels become involved, and while specific areas of the process
beg corrective attention after the test of the past three years, the
process does provide an orderly manner for addressing even
highly volatile cases.
Service as the “Keeper of the Bylaws”: The highly increased use
of electronic mail has added a new expectation to this office,
namely, timely response to a regular stream of e-mailed questions
and concerned comments regarding the Synod’s Articles of In-
corporation, Constitution, Bylaws, and other official documents.
While e-mail is a marvelous new means for communication, it
also has created expectations for timely reply that consume a por-
tion of every day in the Secretary’s Office.
May God now bless us with His guidance and wisdom, enabling
our Synod to come together to conduct its business constructively
and to address the concerns that trouble our life and walk together
in a peaceful and helpful manner.
Raymond L. Hartwig, Secretary
R7-03
Vice-President-Finance—Treasurer/
Chief Financial Officer
The Vice-President-Finance—Treasurer of The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod (the Synod) serves as the Chief Finan-
cial Officer (CFO) in administrating the financial affairs of the
Synod. The duties of the CFO are carried out in accordance with
the rules and regulations adopted by the Synod and as directed by
the Board of Directors of the Synod. I believe all my activities as
CFO have been consistent with this requirement.
During this last triennium, there were external influences that
directly impacted the finances of the Synod. A stock market in de-
cline for nearly three years had a significant negative effect on the
operating income of the Synod and many of its entities. The bear
market also had an adverse effect on the personal wealth of indi-
viduals and the income of charitable foundations, thus limiting their
ability to make charitable contributions. Further, the events of Sep-
tember 11, as well as Enron-type corporate scandals, have in-
creased the costs of managing risk (insurance). These external in-
fluences have had a definite impact on the finances of the Synod.
The Synod’s budgeted revenue for the year ended June 30, 2001,
was $90,257,000 of which $25,000,000 was unrestricted. In the bud-
get for the year ended June 30, 2004, budgeted revenues had de-
creased to $77,400,000, with unrestricted contributions of
$22,000,000. Fortunately, the Synod was not required to incur debt
or dispose of assets because of this shortfall in revenues. However,
the Synod was forced to deplete its reserves and reduce funding to
national ministries. While all national ministries have been adversely
affected by the decrease in the Synod’s revenue, missions, seminaries,
universities, and colleges have been most severely impacted.
During the past several years, the Board for Mission Services
has found it necessary to reduce its annual budget from
$32,000,000 to $26,000,000. In achieving a balanced budget, it was
forced to reduce the number of career missionaries from 100 to 68.
When family members of the missionaries are considered, 125 peo-
ple were affected by the reduction. In addition, the mission staff
residents in St. Louis were reduced from 68 to 34 people.
In 1992, subsidy payments from the Synod to the seminaries,
colleges, and universities (schools) approximated $10,000,000.
With the decrease in the Synod’s revenues, the payment of an an-
nual subsidy by the Synod to the schools was gradually eliminated,
with the fiscal year ending June 30, 2001, being the last year of
subsidy. Also, in the past, the Board for Higher Education/Concor-
dia University System (BHE/CUS) paid one half of property- and
liability-insurance premiums and one half of the audit fees for the
schools. These payments, which approximated $1,900,000, had to
be eliminated entirely during the current fiscal year.
With such cutbacks necessary to achieve a balanced budget, the
church body must now decide if it wants to continue its national
ministries through the historical precedent of centralized direction
by the Synod. In order to do so, the Synod must endorse a method
of funding that will ensure that these ministries have sufficient rev-
enues to operate. The Mid-South and the Southeastern Districts
have referred to this convention two funding proposals. The Board
of Directors of the Synod will continue to evaluate a variety of
funding methods.
In addition to reviewing and evaluating funding methods, it is
important that the Synod determine if it is using its assets in an ef-
ficient manner both functionally and economically. In so doing, our
church body should ask questions such as these:
* How many colleges and universities are needed to accomplish the
ministry?
¢ If Districts were consolidated, could they accomplish their min-
istries effectively? Would infrastructure costs be reduced?
2004 Convention Workbook