Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2004 · 62nd Convention, St. Louis › Page 18

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2004, Page 18

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

18 SYNODICAL REPORTS

exceed child Baptisms. As congregations grew by natural increase,
they tended to focus on activities and resources on ministries that
served their members and families. The Lutheran Hour and, for a
while, Lutheran Television may have been regarded as evangelism
outreach, while congregations focused on other ministries.

Nor has evangelism been part of seminary training. For most of
the 20th century, seminaries focused on training students to main-
tain a Gospel-centered ministry that would welcome visitors, but
taught little about proactive evangelistic ministry. Evangelism may
have been regarded as one of those skills that pastors would even-
tually learn “on the job.” (Mission and evangelism courses could
supplement the seminarians’ understanding of reaching people with
the Gospel. Even today, only one of our two seminaries requires a
course in missiology—one course.)

The 1993 Church Membership Initiative found that 20-30 percent
of Lutheran congregations (both LCMS and Evangelical Lutheran
Church in America) were interested in extending their ministry be-
yond their current membership and were succeeding. The researchers
suggested 30-40 percent of congregations expressed interest in ex-
tending their ministry but had no plan for outreach, had not discovered
how outreach can occur, or appeared unwilling to make required
changes. As many as 40 percent of Lutheran congregations were fo-
cused on serving the needs of the current members, trusting that the
Holy Spirit will use their activities within their congregation to ex-
tend faith beyond their congregation.

During the last half of the 20th century, the Synod did make
significant advances in world mission efforts as God exploded op-
portunities to establish missions and grow partner churches around
the globe. As a continuation of that world mission consciousness,
the concept of seeing North Amcrica as a mission field has resulted
in hundreds of multicultural ministries, especially during the recent
Pentecost 2000 effort.

Another positive note from the last three decades is the people
and congregations of the Synod have committed themselves and
their dollars to supporting world relief and human care programs
in the United States and across the globe through World Relief and
Human Care.

Infighting, bickering, controversies

“Stop infighting and become outward, rather than inward, fo-
cused.” Whether they thought the Synod was, or was not, effec-
tively focusing on the Great Commission, respondents to the Task
Force’s Internet survey reflected their concern that the Synod’s in-
fighting was hindering its fulfillment of the Great Commission.
This is true of both broad groups of respondents, regardless of
whether they believed the Synod does or does not have the Great
Commission as its primary focus.

Among those who said yes, they believed “the LCMS, as a
church body, has as its primary focus the Great Commission, that
is, to reach the lost for Christ,” an analysis of their suggestions for
enhancing this focus found 22 percent recommended the Synod
stop fighting and become more outward (rather than inward) fo-
cused. Also, 22 percent of the comments suggested attention should
be given to the Word of God, Sacraments, Law and Gospel, prayer,
and doctrine. .

Among those who said the Synod did not have the Great Com-
mission as its primary focus, 29 percent of the comments empha-
sized the need to stop infighting. politics, and judgmental attitude
and become outward (rather than inward) focused in order to focus
on reaching the lost for Christ. Eighteen percent of the comments
‘recommended that the only focus be the Great Commission with
primary attention on domestic missions.

Comments from survey respondents reflect polarity in the
Synod: “Steer away from church-growth philosophies and concerns
about numbers.” ... “I have a feeling that many want the church to
stay as it is and not grow.” ... “Keep our traditions and practices.”

2004 Convention Workbook

... “I believe it may be time to let go of some of the traditions and
become a church of the 21st century.” ... “It is our faithfulness,
doctrine, and theology that will attract people.” ... “Many churches
and their pastors have focused on defending the truth as their mis-
sion.” ... “Whether we win or lose numbers is irrelevant; we are
simply called to remain faithful to Christ and proclaim Him to all
nations.”

The survey would seem to indicate that our congregations and
pastors may be choosing sides as to whether the Great Commis-
sion says “go” or “baptize.” We have a strong theological heritage
that must be preserved, even as the fields mpen around us—a re-
minder of the words of the late President Alvin Barry: “Keep the
message straight, Missouri; get the message out, Missouri.”

No longer a Christian culture

Understanding changes in American culture is vital to under-
standing both our membership decline and our future mission. A
“churched” culture characterized the first 60 years of the 20th cen-
tury. During the last 40 years of the century, the American scene
evolved into a post-Christian, even anti-Christian, culture—an
“unchurched” culture. Many institutions, including LCMS congre-
gations, have found this change difficult to acknowledge, let alone
find the means, methods, and resources to address it through min-
istries that include outreach.

Postmodernism and the resulting individualism have struck a
devastating blow, not only to the church, but to society as a whole.
Attitudes of “Whatever seems right for you” predominate, and pop-
ular thought is, “All religions lead to the same god.” Society be-
moans degradation of morals and decency, yet expresses power-
lessness at effecting positive change. Divorce rates climb, children
grow up in single-parent families, states recognize gay “marriages,”
and sexually transmitted diseases rise. Amid all this, the church no
longer seems relevant.

The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod is not alone: most other
mainline denominations have experienced membership decline. In
2000 the number of individuals claiming “no religion” numbered
29.5 million, a number exceeded only by those claiming to be
Roman Catholic (50.9 million) and Baptist (33.8 million). One
study suggests that, although 66 percent of American adults iden-
tify themselves with a Christian group, less than half belong to a
Christian church (and only 30-40 percent of them attend regularly).
In effect, the study says, half the U.S. population is unchurched,
and it projects that the “no religion” population will equal the
“Christian” population by 2040. Today, Mormonism and Islam are
growing faster than Christianity.

This is a time of urgency: Where once the people and congre-
gations of the Synod engaged the frontier, they now find the fron-
tier engaging them. Surrounded by threatening, confusing condi-
tions, we could be tempted to seek refuge behind closed church
doors, to protect what we have, and to hope the situation changes.
Or, we can take stock of our strengths—including our theology,
our frontier experience, our successes in foreign mission fields, our
excellent educational tradition, and our commitment to human
care—and move outward with confidence that our God is the
mighty fortress who is with us wherever we go.

To do so will require the people and congregations to address
serious questions:

¢ Do our congregations see themselves as mission outposts?

* Has our training of pastors, teachers, and laity equipped them to
engage the culture?

* Are we prepared to share our theology with different people?

* How will the church of our forefathers be relevant to our grand-
children?

* If we are afraid of change, will we lose a functioning church body
in the 21st century?