Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2004 · 62nd Convention, St. Louis › Page 18
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2004, Page 18
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
18 SYNODICAL REPORTS
exceed child Baptisms. As congregations grew by natural increase,
they tended to focus on activities and resources on ministries that
served their members and families. The Lutheran Hour and, for a
while, Lutheran Television may have been regarded as evangelism
outreach, while congregations focused on other ministries.
Nor has evangelism been part of seminary training. For most of
the 20th century, seminaries focused on training students to main-
tain a Gospel-centered ministry that would welcome visitors, but
taught little about proactive evangelistic ministry. Evangelism may
have been regarded as one of those skills that pastors would even-
tually learn “on the job.” (Mission and evangelism courses could
supplement the seminarians’ understanding of reaching people with
the Gospel. Even today, only one of our two seminaries requires a
course in missiology—one course.)
The 1993 Church Membership Initiative found that 20-30 percent
of Lutheran congregations (both LCMS and Evangelical Lutheran
Church in America) were interested in extending their ministry be-
yond their current membership and were succeeding. The researchers
suggested 30-40 percent of congregations expressed interest in ex-
tending their ministry but had no plan for outreach, had not discovered
how outreach can occur, or appeared unwilling to make required
changes. As many as 40 percent of Lutheran congregations were fo-
cused on serving the needs of the current members, trusting that the
Holy Spirit will use their activities within their congregation to ex-
tend faith beyond their congregation.
During the last half of the 20th century, the Synod did make
significant advances in world mission efforts as God exploded op-
portunities to establish missions and grow partner churches around
the globe. As a continuation of that world mission consciousness,
the concept of seeing North Amcrica as a mission field has resulted
in hundreds of multicultural ministries, especially during the recent
Pentecost 2000 effort.
Another positive note from the last three decades is the people
and congregations of the Synod have committed themselves and
their dollars to supporting world relief and human care programs
in the United States and across the globe through World Relief and
Human Care.
Infighting, bickering, controversies
“Stop infighting and become outward, rather than inward, fo-
cused.” Whether they thought the Synod was, or was not, effec-
tively focusing on the Great Commission, respondents to the Task
Force’s Internet survey reflected their concern that the Synod’s in-
fighting was hindering its fulfillment of the Great Commission.
This is true of both broad groups of respondents, regardless of
whether they believed the Synod does or does not have the Great
Commission as its primary focus.
Among those who said yes, they believed “the LCMS, as a
church body, has as its primary focus the Great Commission, that
is, to reach the lost for Christ,” an analysis of their suggestions for
enhancing this focus found 22 percent recommended the Synod
stop fighting and become more outward (rather than inward) fo-
cused. Also, 22 percent of the comments suggested attention should
be given to the Word of God, Sacraments, Law and Gospel, prayer,
and doctrine. .
Among those who said the Synod did not have the Great Com-
mission as its primary focus, 29 percent of the comments empha-
sized the need to stop infighting. politics, and judgmental attitude
and become outward (rather than inward) focused in order to focus
on reaching the lost for Christ. Eighteen percent of the comments
‘recommended that the only focus be the Great Commission with
primary attention on domestic missions.
Comments from survey respondents reflect polarity in the
Synod: “Steer away from church-growth philosophies and concerns
about numbers.” ... “I have a feeling that many want the church to
stay as it is and not grow.” ... “Keep our traditions and practices.”
2004 Convention Workbook
... “I believe it may be time to let go of some of the traditions and
become a church of the 21st century.” ... “It is our faithfulness,
doctrine, and theology that will attract people.” ... “Many churches
and their pastors have focused on defending the truth as their mis-
sion.” ... “Whether we win or lose numbers is irrelevant; we are
simply called to remain faithful to Christ and proclaim Him to all
nations.”
The survey would seem to indicate that our congregations and
pastors may be choosing sides as to whether the Great Commis-
sion says “go” or “baptize.” We have a strong theological heritage
that must be preserved, even as the fields mpen around us—a re-
minder of the words of the late President Alvin Barry: “Keep the
message straight, Missouri; get the message out, Missouri.”
No longer a Christian culture
Understanding changes in American culture is vital to under-
standing both our membership decline and our future mission. A
“churched” culture characterized the first 60 years of the 20th cen-
tury. During the last 40 years of the century, the American scene
evolved into a post-Christian, even anti-Christian, culture—an
“unchurched” culture. Many institutions, including LCMS congre-
gations, have found this change difficult to acknowledge, let alone
find the means, methods, and resources to address it through min-
istries that include outreach.
Postmodernism and the resulting individualism have struck a
devastating blow, not only to the church, but to society as a whole.
Attitudes of “Whatever seems right for you” predominate, and pop-
ular thought is, “All religions lead to the same god.” Society be-
moans degradation of morals and decency, yet expresses power-
lessness at effecting positive change. Divorce rates climb, children
grow up in single-parent families, states recognize gay “marriages,”
and sexually transmitted diseases rise. Amid all this, the church no
longer seems relevant.
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod is not alone: most other
mainline denominations have experienced membership decline. In
2000 the number of individuals claiming “no religion” numbered
29.5 million, a number exceeded only by those claiming to be
Roman Catholic (50.9 million) and Baptist (33.8 million). One
study suggests that, although 66 percent of American adults iden-
tify themselves with a Christian group, less than half belong to a
Christian church (and only 30-40 percent of them attend regularly).
In effect, the study says, half the U.S. population is unchurched,
and it projects that the “no religion” population will equal the
“Christian” population by 2040. Today, Mormonism and Islam are
growing faster than Christianity.
This is a time of urgency: Where once the people and congre-
gations of the Synod engaged the frontier, they now find the fron-
tier engaging them. Surrounded by threatening, confusing condi-
tions, we could be tempted to seek refuge behind closed church
doors, to protect what we have, and to hope the situation changes.
Or, we can take stock of our strengths—including our theology,
our frontier experience, our successes in foreign mission fields, our
excellent educational tradition, and our commitment to human
care—and move outward with confidence that our God is the
mighty fortress who is with us wherever we go.
To do so will require the people and congregations to address
serious questions:
¢ Do our congregations see themselves as mission outposts?
* Has our training of pastors, teachers, and laity equipped them to
engage the culture?
* Are we prepared to share our theology with different people?
* How will the church of our forefathers be relevant to our grand-
children?
* If we are afraid of change, will we lose a functioning church body
in the 21st century?