Collection › The Lutheran Pioneer (St. Louis) › Vol. 54 (1932) › Page 138
The Lutheran Pioneer St. Louis — 1932, Page 138
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Sheet 84
Page 82
Sheet 86
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Sheet 98
Page 96
Sheet 100
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Sheet 116
Sheet 117
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Sheet 121
Page 119
Sheet 123
Page 121
Sheet 125
Page 123
Page 124
Sheet 128
Page 126
Sheet 130
Page 128
Sheet 132
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Sheet 148
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Sheet 154
Sheet 155
Page 153
Page 154
Sheet 158
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Sheet 164
Sheet 165
Page 163
Sheet 167
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Sheet 172
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Sheet 179
Sheet 180
Sheet 181
Sheet 182
Page 180
Sheet 184
Page 182
Sheet 186
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Sheet 194
Page 192
Concordia Seminary Library, St. Louis (scholar.csl.edu/lutheran_pioneer/54)
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
138
jointly by the four bodies constituting the Synod-
ical Conference.
The next number of the PronEEr will bring
a full report of the proceedings of the Synodical
Conference in matters concerning our Colored
Missions. F.J.L.
Foot-Binding in China.
The Chinese formerly had an almost universal
custom of compressing the feet of girl children with
tight linen bandages. Before the present century
nearly all but those of the ruling Manchus, a few
wild tribes, slaves, and of immoral women were thus
bound. The origin of the custom is not definitely
known, and it dates back some ten to fifteen cen-
turies. Since the ruling Manchus did not bind their
feet, they at several times also issued edicts for the
purpose of stopping this evil custom, the most
famous edict being that of the celebrated Emperor
K’ang Hsi in the year 1665. But this decree was
canceled four years later. In 1895 ten ladies of
several different nationalities formed the T’ien Tsu
Hui, or Natural Foot Society. This body at once
decided to memorialize the empress-dowager, who,
as a Manchu, was a natural-footed woman. After
being drawn up carefully in English and then trans-
lated into Chinese, the memorial was distributed to
get signatures, and nearly all foreign ladies in the
Far East added their names. It is believed that
the petition reathed the palace, and in 1902 Her
Majesty issued an antifoot-binding edict. Tracts
were distributed by the hundreds of thousands, all
viceroys and provincial governors were memorial-
ized, concurrently numerous Chinese native soci-
eties opposing this cruel practise sprang into exis-
tence, schools were opened in which only natural-
footed girls were admitted, and in a few short years
the reform was practically completed. In 1906 the
Tien Tsu Hui made its last report. At the present
writing one may see all the older women with bound
feet, but the younger generation is growing up
almost altogether with natural feet. In Southern
China, owing to its long opposition to northern
customs and to the influence of the T’ai-p’ing Re-
bellion after 1850, the foot-binding custom is rapidly
disappearing altogether. In Northern China and
in the country districts there is still quite a bit of it.
In the territory where our Missouri Synod is doing
mission-work, one comes in contact with a fresh
case of foot-binding every now and then.
The accompanying picture shows the feet of
THE LUTHERAN PIONEER
Li Mei-hsio, who for some time has been coming
to our Trinity Chapel at Shasi for instruction in
the Word of God. Mei-hsio is sixteen years of age
now, and her feet were bound by her mother when
she was less than twelve. Just recently she had
probably been a bit careless in keeping her feet
bound, and her mother again started binding them
tighter in order to make them smaller.. Mei-hsio’s
mother had betrothed her when she was but a child,
and now that she is becoming a young lady, plans
are buzzing for a future marriage. Communica-
Li Mei-Hsio.
Note how the toes and heel are forced under
the foot.
tions have been established with the people of the
future husband, and word was sent that he did not
want a wife with large, clumsy, awkward feet.
Hereupon Mei-hsio’s mother undertook to cramp
the feet still more.’ She first clubbed the girl over
the head to bring her into submission, and then
the cruel process began anew. Just at that time the
wife of the missionary happened into the home and
shamed the mother and brought the*cruel act to a
close for the time -being. As far as we know, the
mother has not tried to bind them since; for it is
contrary to present-day Chinese law to do s0,
although laws are at times practically just so much