Collection › The Lutheran Pioneer (St. Louis) › Vol. 54 (1932) › Page 138

The Lutheran Pioneer St. Louis — 1932, Page 138

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Sheet 84 Page 82 Sheet 86 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Sheet 98 Page 96 Sheet 100 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Sheet 116 Sheet 117 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Sheet 121 Page 119 Sheet 123 Page 121 Sheet 125 Page 123 Page 124 Sheet 128 Page 126 Sheet 130 Page 128 Sheet 132 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Sheet 148 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Sheet 154 Sheet 155 Page 153 Page 154 Sheet 158 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Sheet 164 Sheet 165 Page 163 Sheet 167 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Sheet 172 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Sheet 179 Sheet 180 Sheet 181 Sheet 182 Page 180 Sheet 184 Page 182 Sheet 186 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Sheet 194 Page 192

Concordia Seminary Library, St. Louis (scholar.csl.edu/lutheran_pioneer/54)

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

138

jointly by the four bodies constituting the Synod-
ical Conference.

The next number of the PronEEr will bring
a full report of the proceedings of the Synodical
Conference in matters concerning our Colored
Missions. F.J.L.

Foot-Binding in China.

The Chinese formerly had an almost universal
custom of compressing the feet of girl children with
tight linen bandages. Before the present century
nearly all but those of the ruling Manchus, a few
wild tribes, slaves, and of immoral women were thus
bound. The origin of the custom is not definitely
known, and it dates back some ten to fifteen cen-
turies. Since the ruling Manchus did not bind their
feet, they at several times also issued edicts for the
purpose of stopping this evil custom, the most
famous edict being that of the celebrated Emperor
K’ang Hsi in the year 1665. But this decree was
canceled four years later. In 1895 ten ladies of
several different nationalities formed the T’ien Tsu
Hui, or Natural Foot Society. This body at once
decided to memorialize the empress-dowager, who,
as a Manchu, was a natural-footed woman. After
being drawn up carefully in English and then trans-
lated into Chinese, the memorial was distributed to
get signatures, and nearly all foreign ladies in the
Far East added their names. It is believed that
the petition reathed the palace, and in 1902 Her
Majesty issued an antifoot-binding edict. Tracts
were distributed by the hundreds of thousands, all
viceroys and provincial governors were memorial-
ized, concurrently numerous Chinese native soci-
eties opposing this cruel practise sprang into exis-
tence, schools were opened in which only natural-
footed girls were admitted, and in a few short years
the reform was practically completed. In 1906 the
Tien Tsu Hui made its last report. At the present
writing one may see all the older women with bound
feet, but the younger generation is growing up
almost altogether with natural feet. In Southern
China, owing to its long opposition to northern
customs and to the influence of the T’ai-p’ing Re-
bellion after 1850, the foot-binding custom is rapidly
disappearing altogether. In Northern China and
in the country districts there is still quite a bit of it.
In the territory where our Missouri Synod is doing
mission-work, one comes in contact with a fresh
case of foot-binding every now and then.

The accompanying picture shows the feet of

THE LUTHERAN PIONEER

Li Mei-hsio, who for some time has been coming
to our Trinity Chapel at Shasi for instruction in
the Word of God. Mei-hsio is sixteen years of age
now, and her feet were bound by her mother when
she was less than twelve. Just recently she had
probably been a bit careless in keeping her feet
bound, and her mother again started binding them
tighter in order to make them smaller.. Mei-hsio’s
mother had betrothed her when she was but a child,
and now that she is becoming a young lady, plans
are buzzing for a future marriage. Communica-

Li Mei-Hsio.

Note how the toes and heel are forced under
the foot.
tions have been established with the people of the
future husband, and word was sent that he did not
want a wife with large, clumsy, awkward feet.
Hereupon Mei-hsio’s mother undertook to cramp
the feet still more.’ She first clubbed the girl over
the head to bring her into submission, and then
the cruel process began anew. Just at that time the
wife of the missionary happened into the home and
shamed the mother and brought the*cruel act to a
close for the time -being. As far as we know, the
mother has not tried to bind them since; for it is
contrary to present-day Chinese law to do s0,
although laws are at times practically just so much