Collection › The Lutheran Pioneer (St. Louis) › Vol. 54 (1932) › Page 131

The Lutheran Pioneer St. Louis — 1932, Page 131

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Sheet 84 Page 82 Sheet 86 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Sheet 98 Page 96 Sheet 100 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Sheet 116 Sheet 117 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Sheet 121 Page 119 Sheet 123 Page 121 Sheet 125 Page 123 Page 124 Sheet 128 Page 126 Sheet 130 Page 128 Sheet 132 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Sheet 148 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Sheet 154 Sheet 155 Page 153 Page 154 Sheet 158 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Sheet 164 Sheet 165 Page 163 Sheet 167 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Sheet 172 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Sheet 179 Sheet 180 Sheet 181 Sheet 182 Page 180 Sheet 184 Page 182 Sheet 186 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Sheet 194 Page 192

Concordia Seminary Library, St. Louis (scholar.csl.edu/lutheran_pioneer/54)

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

THE LUTHERAN PIONEER 131
ing the subject, Professor Scherf showed that the the regular or the irregular attendants?” It is

heart of the discussion was found in the following
two exhortations: 1. Adhere to the Church of the
pure Word of God; 2. avoid all false churches.

Pastor G. M. Kramer and His Last
Confirmaton Class.

In the Friday morning session Professor Scherf’s
paper on “The Image of God” engaged our atten-
tion. ‘The afternoon session of this day was de-
voted largely to the discussion of plans for the
entertainment of the General Conference to be
held here in June, 1933. The General Conference
Entertainment Committee, consisting of Chairman
Luecke, Teacher W. B. Seeberry, and the writer,
submitted its plans. These plans, providing to the
minutest detail for the entertainment of our fellow-
workers in the vineyard of the Lord, were adopted
in detail and as a whole by the conference.

According to present plans the General Con-
ference will begin on the second Wednesday after
the closing of our schools, the second Wednesday
after the second Friday in June, 1933. Further
information will be given from time to time in
our periodicals.

After the disposal of this matter concerning
General Conference, Miss Craig’s paper was re-
sumed.

In the second open meeting, Friday evening,
Professor Scherf conducted an open forum. This
feature of Luther Conference is usually highly in-
teresting and instructive. Questions previously
submitted and bearing solely on Scripture and
religion are studied and answered by the brethren.
As examples of the contents of the question box
note these questions: “Will an unbaptized child be
saved?” “If I cannot persuade my wife to join
the Lutheran Church, am I a participant in her
sin of worshiping in a false church?” “Which
members are in greater need of pastoral visitations,

apparent from such questions that many matters
may perplex the minds and trouble the hearts of
our members, matters of which the pastor may have
no inkling at all.

The last closed session was held on Saturday
morning. Professor Scherl’s paper was completed.
Though it contained heavy doctrinal matter, the
discussion was very lively, at times even tense.

Miss Craig’s paper was also completed in this
session. This paper, a truly excellent and timely
one, was treated under three heads: “1. The edu-
cational status of our schools in the community.
2. The great difficulties under which we labor in
dispensing Lutheran education. 3. Factors which
may play an important part in keeping our children
interested in our schools.” The key-note of Miss
Craig’s paper, as the writer understood it, was this:
If we persist in being educational mossbacks, using
antiquated and discarded methods of instruction,
take no notice of the great strides in public edu-
cation around us, and do nothing to counteract the
effects when we do observe them, we shall sooner
or later find ourselves in the situation of Rip Van
Winkle. We shall wake up, looking for the king
of England, while those around us will be hailing
the President of the United States.

The closing service took place on Sunday
evening. The sermon was delivered by Professor
Scherf. In a forceful address the speaker exhorted
the large gathering on the basis of Ps. 127, 1.

With this service Luther
Conference was brought to a
close. We shall meet again,
God willing, with our breth-
ren of other fields, here in
New Orleans, June, 1933.

However, kind reader, this
report would be woefully in-
complete were we not to men-
tion the kindly, loving service
of Bethlehem Ladies’ Aid and
of the Bethlehem Choir. In
spite of the depression, which has for so long
gripped the people of our entire country, these two
organizations provided us with delicious, satisfying
meals at each day’s session, the ladies’ aid entertain-
ing one day, and the Bethlehem Choir the next.
May our Lord Jesus, in the interest of whose glo-
rious kingdom the conference was convened, reward
their labor of love!

In addition to the service of the choir at the

Teacher Aaron Wiley,
Bethlehem, New Orleans.