Collection › The Lutheran Pioneer (St. Louis) › Vol. 54 (1932) › Page 131
The Lutheran Pioneer St. Louis — 1932, Page 131
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Sheet 84
Page 82
Sheet 86
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Sheet 98
Page 96
Sheet 100
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Sheet 116
Sheet 117
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Sheet 121
Page 119
Sheet 123
Page 121
Sheet 125
Page 123
Page 124
Sheet 128
Page 126
Sheet 130
Page 128
Sheet 132
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Sheet 148
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Sheet 154
Sheet 155
Page 153
Page 154
Sheet 158
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Sheet 164
Sheet 165
Page 163
Sheet 167
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Sheet 172
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Sheet 179
Sheet 180
Sheet 181
Sheet 182
Page 180
Sheet 184
Page 182
Sheet 186
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Sheet 194
Page 192
Concordia Seminary Library, St. Louis (scholar.csl.edu/lutheran_pioneer/54)
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
THE LUTHERAN PIONEER 131
ing the subject, Professor Scherf showed that the the regular or the irregular attendants?” It is
heart of the discussion was found in the following
two exhortations: 1. Adhere to the Church of the
pure Word of God; 2. avoid all false churches.
Pastor G. M. Kramer and His Last
Confirmaton Class.
In the Friday morning session Professor Scherf’s
paper on “The Image of God” engaged our atten-
tion. ‘The afternoon session of this day was de-
voted largely to the discussion of plans for the
entertainment of the General Conference to be
held here in June, 1933. The General Conference
Entertainment Committee, consisting of Chairman
Luecke, Teacher W. B. Seeberry, and the writer,
submitted its plans. These plans, providing to the
minutest detail for the entertainment of our fellow-
workers in the vineyard of the Lord, were adopted
in detail and as a whole by the conference.
According to present plans the General Con-
ference will begin on the second Wednesday after
the closing of our schools, the second Wednesday
after the second Friday in June, 1933. Further
information will be given from time to time in
our periodicals.
After the disposal of this matter concerning
General Conference, Miss Craig’s paper was re-
sumed.
In the second open meeting, Friday evening,
Professor Scherf conducted an open forum. This
feature of Luther Conference is usually highly in-
teresting and instructive. Questions previously
submitted and bearing solely on Scripture and
religion are studied and answered by the brethren.
As examples of the contents of the question box
note these questions: “Will an unbaptized child be
saved?” “If I cannot persuade my wife to join
the Lutheran Church, am I a participant in her
sin of worshiping in a false church?” “Which
members are in greater need of pastoral visitations,
apparent from such questions that many matters
may perplex the minds and trouble the hearts of
our members, matters of which the pastor may have
no inkling at all.
The last closed session was held on Saturday
morning. Professor Scherl’s paper was completed.
Though it contained heavy doctrinal matter, the
discussion was very lively, at times even tense.
Miss Craig’s paper was also completed in this
session. This paper, a truly excellent and timely
one, was treated under three heads: “1. The edu-
cational status of our schools in the community.
2. The great difficulties under which we labor in
dispensing Lutheran education. 3. Factors which
may play an important part in keeping our children
interested in our schools.” The key-note of Miss
Craig’s paper, as the writer understood it, was this:
If we persist in being educational mossbacks, using
antiquated and discarded methods of instruction,
take no notice of the great strides in public edu-
cation around us, and do nothing to counteract the
effects when we do observe them, we shall sooner
or later find ourselves in the situation of Rip Van
Winkle. We shall wake up, looking for the king
of England, while those around us will be hailing
the President of the United States.
The closing service took place on Sunday
evening. The sermon was delivered by Professor
Scherf. In a forceful address the speaker exhorted
the large gathering on the basis of Ps. 127, 1.
With this service Luther
Conference was brought to a
close. We shall meet again,
God willing, with our breth-
ren of other fields, here in
New Orleans, June, 1933.
However, kind reader, this
report would be woefully in-
complete were we not to men-
tion the kindly, loving service
of Bethlehem Ladies’ Aid and
of the Bethlehem Choir. In
spite of the depression, which has for so long
gripped the people of our entire country, these two
organizations provided us with delicious, satisfying
meals at each day’s session, the ladies’ aid entertain-
ing one day, and the Bethlehem Choir the next.
May our Lord Jesus, in the interest of whose glo-
rious kingdom the conference was convened, reward
their labor of love!
In addition to the service of the choir at the
Teacher Aaron Wiley,
Bethlehem, New Orleans.