Collection › The Lutheran Pioneer (St. Louis) › Vol. 48 (1926) › Page 190

The Lutheran Pioneer St. Louis — 1926, Page 190

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Sheet 44 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Sheet 51 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Sheet 59 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Sheet 67 Page 66 Sheet 69 Page 68 Sheet 71 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Sheet 75 Page 74 Sheet 77 Page 76 Sheet 79 Page 78 Sheet 81 Page 80 Sheet 83 Page 82 Sheet 85 Sheet 86 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Sheet 92 Page 90 Page 91 Sheet 95 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Sheet 100 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Sheet 116 Page 114 Sheet 118 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Sheet 122 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Sheet 126 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Sheet 132 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Sheet 147 Sheet 148 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Sheet 158 Page 156 Page 157 Sheet 161 Page 159 Page 160 Sheet 164 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Sheet 180 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Sheet 186 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Sheet 190 Page 188 Sheet 192 Page 190 Page 191 Sheet 195

Concordia Seminary Library, St. Louis (scholar.csl.edu/lutheran_pioneer/48)

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

190

THE LUTHERAN PIONEER.

of his father, and as he was ever on the search for
his relatives, he asked the man who he was. To his
great surprise the man replied that his name was
Ganesh. By the goodness of God he had found
his twin brother.

After they had touched upon various matters
relating to the early family history, Ganesh took
Gopal to his home. It was a small, broken-down,
dirty, and miserable hut. <A dirty heathen woman
dressed in rags met them at the entrance. She was
the wife of Ganesh. ‘Two little naked children
looked at Gopal with frightened eyes. They were
his little nephews. Gopal was told there was an-
other child, a girl ten years of age, but she was
married and was living in another village with
her husband.

Ganesh was a heathen, a worshiper of idols.
He and his family were wretched, exceedingly
poor and miserable. He and his family had no
happiness in this world, and the future was an
unknown terror.

Gopal was a Christian; he and his family
worshiped Christ as their Savior. They had found
true happiness in serving their Redeemer, and
their future seemed to grow brighter with each
passing day. :

What made the difference in the two brothers?
What made the difference in the two families? The
answer is simple: one had heard and received the
Gospel of Jesus, the other had never had the
opportunity.

This same Gospel has the same power to-day
that it always had. There are millions of families
like that of Ganesh, living in dark heathenism,
and if they only had the Gospel-message, it would
change them into “new creatures,” into. God’s
children. It would bring light, joy, peace, and
true happiness into lives that now only know misery
and darkness.

Is it worth while to bring the Gospel of Jesus
into heathen lands? For the answer, just shut your
eyes and try to imagine yourselves with your loved
ones living in a distant heathen village of India
or China. You would be no better than Ganesh
and his wife, and your children would be like their
children.

What you are now Jesus did for you through
His Gospel. You owe it all to Jesus. Now, your
Savior, who was so merciful to you, is pleading
with you to have mercy and to help send this
Gospel, which has done so much for you to others
that are still in darkness. Will'you do it?

You alone, or you with others, can have a native
Christian missionary work for you in India or
in China or in some other field of our Church. By
helping to support a worker in India or China you
can work for your Lord twenty-four hours each day.

Eight to ten dollars a month will support a
native worker in India with his wife. The hope of
salvation of thousands will depend on this worker
alone. Thirty dollars a month will enable the
Board for Negro Missions to engage a teacher to
teach the colored children in Alabama the way
to Jesus and through Him to heaven. What an
opportunity for one of our more well-to-do
Christians ! F.J.L.

Church Giving in the United States.

There has been a healthy and steady increase
in the religious giving of the members of all
denominations. In 1925 the people of the United
States and Canada gave the large sum of
$656,000,000 for church maintenance and benev-
olences. Of this grand total the Disciples gave
more than $20,000,000; the Congregationalists,
over $26,000,000; the Episcopalians, $39,000,000;
the Baptists, $73,000,000; the Presbyterians,
$78,000,000; the Methodists, $147,000,000, of
which the Methodist Episcopal churches gave
nearly $94,000,000, while the Roman Catholics led
with a total of $168,000,000, or approximately
one-fourth of the whole amount. In 1924 the
total contributions of the Lutherans for all church
purposes were $51,090,327, and of.the Missouri
Synod for the year 1925 it was $13,701,745.

In per capita giving to outside benevolences the
United Presbyterian, a small denomination, ranks
first, with $14.95 per member, while the Methodist
Episcopalians ranked thirteenth with $3.81 per
member. For benevolences, that is, for all outside
religious purposes, the communicant members of
the Missouri Synod gave an average of $6.83 per
communicant member in 1925, and for home pur-
poses the average contribution per communicant
member was $15.16 last year; a total of $21.99
for all church purposes.

This is an impressive showing and evidences
a gratifying growth in the grace of giving
Christendom. But impressive as this showing may
be, it is not up to the standard which a well-
balanced stewardship would set for the religious
needs of to-day.

Speaking of increase in church giving, Dr. Love-