Collection › The Lutheran Pioneer (St. Louis) › Vol. 48 (1926) › Page 190
The Lutheran Pioneer St. Louis — 1926, Page 190
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Sheet 44
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Sheet 51
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Sheet 59
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Sheet 67
Page 66
Sheet 69
Page 68
Sheet 71
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Sheet 75
Page 74
Sheet 77
Page 76
Sheet 79
Page 78
Sheet 81
Page 80
Sheet 83
Page 82
Sheet 85
Sheet 86
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Sheet 92
Page 90
Page 91
Sheet 95
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Sheet 100
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Sheet 116
Page 114
Sheet 118
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Sheet 122
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Sheet 126
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Sheet 132
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Sheet 147
Sheet 148
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Sheet 158
Page 156
Page 157
Sheet 161
Page 159
Page 160
Sheet 164
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Sheet 180
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Sheet 186
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Sheet 190
Page 188
Sheet 192
Page 190
Page 191
Sheet 195
Concordia Seminary Library, St. Louis (scholar.csl.edu/lutheran_pioneer/48)
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
190
THE LUTHERAN PIONEER.
of his father, and as he was ever on the search for
his relatives, he asked the man who he was. To his
great surprise the man replied that his name was
Ganesh. By the goodness of God he had found
his twin brother.
After they had touched upon various matters
relating to the early family history, Ganesh took
Gopal to his home. It was a small, broken-down,
dirty, and miserable hut. <A dirty heathen woman
dressed in rags met them at the entrance. She was
the wife of Ganesh. ‘Two little naked children
looked at Gopal with frightened eyes. They were
his little nephews. Gopal was told there was an-
other child, a girl ten years of age, but she was
married and was living in another village with
her husband.
Ganesh was a heathen, a worshiper of idols.
He and his family were wretched, exceedingly
poor and miserable. He and his family had no
happiness in this world, and the future was an
unknown terror.
Gopal was a Christian; he and his family
worshiped Christ as their Savior. They had found
true happiness in serving their Redeemer, and
their future seemed to grow brighter with each
passing day. :
What made the difference in the two brothers?
What made the difference in the two families? The
answer is simple: one had heard and received the
Gospel of Jesus, the other had never had the
opportunity.
This same Gospel has the same power to-day
that it always had. There are millions of families
like that of Ganesh, living in dark heathenism,
and if they only had the Gospel-message, it would
change them into “new creatures,” into. God’s
children. It would bring light, joy, peace, and
true happiness into lives that now only know misery
and darkness.
Is it worth while to bring the Gospel of Jesus
into heathen lands? For the answer, just shut your
eyes and try to imagine yourselves with your loved
ones living in a distant heathen village of India
or China. You would be no better than Ganesh
and his wife, and your children would be like their
children.
What you are now Jesus did for you through
His Gospel. You owe it all to Jesus. Now, your
Savior, who was so merciful to you, is pleading
with you to have mercy and to help send this
Gospel, which has done so much for you to others
that are still in darkness. Will'you do it?
You alone, or you with others, can have a native
Christian missionary work for you in India or
in China or in some other field of our Church. By
helping to support a worker in India or China you
can work for your Lord twenty-four hours each day.
Eight to ten dollars a month will support a
native worker in India with his wife. The hope of
salvation of thousands will depend on this worker
alone. Thirty dollars a month will enable the
Board for Negro Missions to engage a teacher to
teach the colored children in Alabama the way
to Jesus and through Him to heaven. What an
opportunity for one of our more well-to-do
Christians ! F.J.L.
Church Giving in the United States.
There has been a healthy and steady increase
in the religious giving of the members of all
denominations. In 1925 the people of the United
States and Canada gave the large sum of
$656,000,000 for church maintenance and benev-
olences. Of this grand total the Disciples gave
more than $20,000,000; the Congregationalists,
over $26,000,000; the Episcopalians, $39,000,000;
the Baptists, $73,000,000; the Presbyterians,
$78,000,000; the Methodists, $147,000,000, of
which the Methodist Episcopal churches gave
nearly $94,000,000, while the Roman Catholics led
with a total of $168,000,000, or approximately
one-fourth of the whole amount. In 1924 the
total contributions of the Lutherans for all church
purposes were $51,090,327, and of.the Missouri
Synod for the year 1925 it was $13,701,745.
In per capita giving to outside benevolences the
United Presbyterian, a small denomination, ranks
first, with $14.95 per member, while the Methodist
Episcopalians ranked thirteenth with $3.81 per
member. For benevolences, that is, for all outside
religious purposes, the communicant members of
the Missouri Synod gave an average of $6.83 per
communicant member in 1925, and for home pur-
poses the average contribution per communicant
member was $15.16 last year; a total of $21.99
for all church purposes.
This is an impressive showing and evidences
a gratifying growth in the grace of giving
Christendom. But impressive as this showing may
be, it is not up to the standard which a well-
balanced stewardship would set for the religious
needs of to-day.
Speaking of increase in church giving, Dr. Love-