Collection › The Lutheran Pioneer (St. Louis) › Vol. 48 (1926) › Page 74

The Lutheran Pioneer St. Louis — 1926, Page 74

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Sheet 44 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Sheet 51 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Sheet 59 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Sheet 67 Page 66 Sheet 69 Page 68 Sheet 71 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Sheet 75 Page 74 Sheet 77 Page 76 Sheet 79 Page 78 Sheet 81 Page 80 Sheet 83 Page 82 Sheet 85 Sheet 86 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Sheet 92 Page 90 Page 91 Sheet 95 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Sheet 100 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Sheet 116 Page 114 Sheet 118 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Sheet 122 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Sheet 126 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Sheet 132 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Sheet 147 Sheet 148 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Sheet 158 Page 156 Page 157 Sheet 161 Page 159 Page 160 Sheet 164 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Sheet 180 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Sheet 186 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Sheet 190 Page 188 Sheet 192 Page 190 Page 191 Sheet 195

Concordia Seminary Library, St. Louis (scholar.csl.edu/lutheran_pioneer/48)

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

74

THE LUTHERAN PIONEER.

Chinese immigration, which began in 1850, was
stopped in 1882 by a law in harmony with a treaty
negotiated for the purpose in 1880. Since that time
the Chinese population has steadily diminished and
in 1920 in continental United States was 61,639,
of whom 18,532 are American-born and therefore
are American citizens. They live chiefly in cities
and towns. East of the Rockies their most con-
spicuous industry is the “Chinese laundry.” Other-
wise they are traders and in the West, in decreasing
numbers, truck gardeners.

Japanese immigration rapidly increased from
1900 to 1908, when the “gentlemen’s agreement”
was adopted —without Congressional legislation.
Between 1908 and 1924 more Japanese males left
the United States than entered by 21,869; but
41,920 more females entered than left, leaving a net
increase of 20,051. Of these 10,959 were in con-
tinental United States and 8,500 in Hawaii. These
figures do not include American-born children. Of
the total Japanese population — 111,010 recorded
in continental United States in the census of 1920—
29,672 were American-born. In May, 1924, the
“gentlemen’s agreement” was abrogated by the im-
migration law of that year, which provided that
aliens “ineligible for citizenship” shall not be ad-
mitted as immigrants for permanent residence.
Exceptions for travelers, students, merchants, and
officials as temporary residents were, of course, per-
mitted. Japanese have settled chiefly in the Pacific
coast States and have hitherto been chiefly occupied
in agriculture, especially in California. Repressive
state legislation, however, is resulting in their taking
up city life and city occupations.

Chinese and Japanese students have come to the
United States in very considerable numbers (be-
tween 2,500 and 3,000 being present in our colleges
and universities in recent years). Their welcome
and fine treatment constitute a bright spot in fur-
thering good-will between the United States and
the Far East.

Indians in the United States.

In some communities there is no distinction
made between Indians and whites. Many of them
have already intermarried, and such groups are
rapidly being increased by the addition of educated
young people. There are still Indians who dress
more or less in their tribal costumes, some of whom
for various reasons have standards of living different
from their white neighbors. A few Indians are re-

_ ceiving immense oil royalties from the barren lands

to which they were assigned. Members of this
group are likely to be the subjects of the exploita-
tion, sentimental interest, or disdain of some mem-
bers of their own race or of the whites.

In the continental United States there are ap-
proximately 336,000 Indians; in Alaska about
37,000. They are mainly on 147 reservations and
in scattered communities in 20 States. ‘There are
more than 150 tribal bands and clans, all speaking
different languages and dialects. Less than one-
third in the United States are related to Christian
communions. ‘There are 233 government Indian
schools, including 154 reservation day-schools, 54
reservation boarding-schools, and 27 non-reservation
boarding-schools. There are also 37 Roman Catholic
and 20 Protestant mission-schools for them.

The majority of the Indian people live in small
towns or in rural communities, no longer segregated
since settlers have bought or leased so much of the
surplus Indian land. This has increased our Indian
problem. The pride of the Indian people and their
inexperience in modern life have rendered them
keenly sensitive to the real or seeming negligence
of the doctor, to the greed of the lawyer, to the
seeming prejudice of the new teacher, and the in-
creased prices of merchants. On the other hand
a sense of irritation is sometimes felt by the whites
because of the Indian’s seeming lack of appreciation
of his abundance of land and the Government’s aid
in the education of his children in the face of their
own struggles for a livelihood and the advancement
of their children.

Mexicans in the United States.

The Immigration: Act of July 1, 1924, allows
citizens of Mexico who pass the tests to enter the
United States in unlimited numbers. Before that,
however, Mexicans admitted by immigration authori-
ties had increased annually each fiscal year from
13,000 in 1914 to 87,000 in 1924, except in 1921
and 1922, when there was a recession. ‘This does not
account for those entering clandestinely along the
1,800 miles of the border.

Besides large populations of them in Texas and
other Southwestern States, considerable numbers
settled in Kansas, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska,
Nevada, Illinois, and Pennsylvania. In 1923, out
of a total of 297 families with children under
16 years of age in the beet-fields of five counties of
Nebraska and one adjoining county of Wyoming,
44 were contract labor families. Large Mexican
colonies are reported in the steel towns of Joliet, Ill.,