Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2013 · 65th Convention, St. Louis › Page 413
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2013, Page 413
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
Specific Ministry Pastor (SMP) Task Force
a special call, for the church cannot make a call according to its whim,
but can give only that which God has established and which He alone
recognizes (by this alone is a servant of God made, not through a human
contract for a few hours or days). That the matter also cannot be based
upon the emergency situation is quite clear.
This has not stopped Christian denominations from authorizing
laymen to perform pastoral functions in certain circumstances. In
1997 the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), for example, created a “commissioned lay pastor” (CLP) position “to permit elders trained and
approved by the presbytery to carry out all the functions of clergy
for the length of their commission in a particular ministry” (“Ready
to Lead?” Christian Century, July 13, 2010, p. 28). In her article,
Barbara Wheeler writes of a situation in her denomination not unlike
that of the LCMS:
We were not alone. In a region that was losing population, and businesses and leadership as well, our pastor’s impending departure was a
loss for the whole area.
There are tens of thousands of mainline Protestant congregations
like Bethel Peniel, congregations that have a significant ministry but
are unable to pay the minimum salaries that denominations mandate
for a full-time professional leader. The congregations can be found in
cities, towns and rural areas. Studies conducted in the middle of this
decade by the Cooperative Congregational Studies Partnership indicate
that more than half of all mainline Protestant congregations have 100 or
fewer members.
After the 1997 decision to create a “commissioned lay pastor”
position, the program took its course: “Over the past 15 years, the
development of the CLPs has taken a very different course from the
one its proponents forecast. Use of CLPs is not limited to a few special settings but is widespread.” This is not to say, says Wheeler, that
these lay ministers have no part to play:
The original purpose for which the commissioned lay pastorate
was devised—providing leaders for groups of new immigrants—is still
pressing. They can also serve very widely in the church. Paraprofessionals play increasingly important parts in other sectors, and they can
in this one too.
Paraprofessional ministers can help mainline denominations whose
financial resources are now at a low ebb do more with less. They can
work in tandem with clergy, filling on a part-time basis a variety of roles
in administrative, social service, and pastoral care ministries that paid
professional staff would occupy in a sizeable congregation.
To do so, says Wheeler, will require improved education (than
what the Presbyterian Church is offering) and an effective mainline
denomination presence:
Mainline religion, often accused of irrelevance these days, may have
diminished influence at the centers of power. Out on the margins, however, in places like Granville, it makes a decisive difference, and the vision, depth of understanding, and personal maturity that well-educated
pastors bring to their work are a pivotal part of the mainline contribution.
V. What Participants Have Said
The Specific Ministry Pastor Task Force went to great lengths
to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the SMP program by
interviewing members of the faculty and staff of Concordia Seminary
in St. Louis, Concordia Theological Seminary in Ft. Wayne, a wide
variety of district presidents, SMP mentors, and SMP students. All
involved in this program are to be commended for the high quality of
work being done in service to the Lord and His Church. Recounted
below are strengths of the SMP program as identified by those interviewed and a summary of the strengths of the SMP Task Force based
on its research.
413
A. Strengths of the Specific Ministry Pastor Program...
... As Identified by Faculty and Staff of Seminaries
•
•
•
•
The faculty and staffs of both seminaries have recognized many
strengths of the SMP program.
Generally speaking, they have been impressed by the high quality of
students enrolled, their work, and by the students’ motivation to prove
themselves for the noble task of pastoral ministry.
The SMP students have also formed good relationships with each other
and have grown into a close and caring community through their ongoing interaction with each other online.
In addition, some of the successes of the SMP program have lead to a
review of how the residential seminary program could be improved.
... As Identified by District Presidents
• The SMP program addresses the concerns some people had with the
previous DELTO program. It is an innovative and appropriate response
to the drastic clergy shortage that the LCMS will experience in a few
years. It also addresses the dilemma faced by those who are qualified
to serve as pastors but who, for a variety of reasons, are not able to
move to the seminary.
• The SMP program allows SMP students to be trained by our seminary
professors and mentored by experienced parish pastors. It allows them
to gain practical experience by serving a congregation while working
through the SMP curriculum. Without the SMP program, these men
would be denied the opportunity to serve the Lord and His people as
pastors.
• The SMP program also allows us the opportunity to train a new generation of pastors who come from various ethnic backgrounds.
• An additional strength of the SMP program is the mentor process. An
active and engaged mentor helps the candidate understand the pastoral ministry from a practical perspective while making sure that the
candidate receives the emotional and spiritual support needed as he
makes his way through his SMP studies. It also holds the SMP student accountable.
• The SMP program rises from contextual needs, two in particular. The
first is how to bring sound Word and Sacrament ministry to congregations that no longer can afford a full-time pastor. Licensed lay deacons
are serving in a number of these congregations. The second is how to
launch new Word and Sacrament ministries, either from a given congregation or planting from scratch.
• The faculties have done an incredible job of building curricula to make
this work. They have come at this task with fresh insights and huge
ministry hearts. Their spirit as the church’s servants stands out. It permeates the program. You can’t manufacture that servant spirit and that
pastoral heart. It is all over the place and it has been driven, at least in
part, by the fact that the professors are equipping men already in ministry. The professors that have this pastoral “habitus” seem to thrive
in classes filled with motivated pastors—whether that is D.Min, STM,
or PhD level courses.
• The students, having ministry experience and coming to the theological task from that place, help shape the dynamic of the classroom and
therefore, the structure of the course.
... As Identified by SMP Mentors
•
•
•
SMP students are mature with a strong desire to learn. SMP students
are dedicated to serving the Lord and His church. Mentors believe that
there is a benefit to SMP students being instructed while at the same
time serving in a ministry setting.
Another benefit to the SMP student is being able to pursue pastoral
ministry without having to move his entire family to a new location.
Close partnerships have developed between mentors and their SMP
students. In addition, mentors cited the positives of the SMP cohort
relationships where students find encouragement from each other.
They also found SMP students have forged a close relationship with
seminary professors and staff who have also been a great source of
encouragement.
2013 Convention Workbook