Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2013 · 65th Convention, St. Louis › Page 310

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2013, Page 310

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

310

OPINIONS OF COMMISSION ON CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS

Question 1: In the case of a dual parish with two called pastors,
may both pastors of this dual parish vote at the circuit
forum to elect delegates to a convention of the national
Synod, each pastor representing a different congregation
(governed by Bylaw 3.1.2.1 [c])?
Opinion: No. In contrast to lay delegates who are affiliated with
only one congregation, a pastor/pastors of a multiple-congregation
parish is/are called by and serve the whole. Therefore, only one
pastor would be eligible to represent the multiple-congregation parish at meetings of the circuit forum to elect delegates to a convention of the national Synod.
The commission observes that Article V of the Constitution of
the Synod lays the foundation for the matter of franchise within the
Synod. Paragraph A of Article V states:
A. Voting Members
All organized congregations that have joined the Synod hold voting
membership. At the meetings of the districts of the Synod, every congregation or parish is entitled to two votes, one of which is to be cast by the
pastor and the other by the lay delegate. At the meetings of the Synod, a
number of congregations shall form a group which shall be represented
by two voting delegates, one a pastor and one a lay delegate.

At district conventions, Article V A establishes that each congregation or multiple-congregation parish is entitled to two votes, one by
a pastor and the other by a lay delegate representing the congregation.
At its February 7–8, 2009 meeting, the provision that at district conventions a multiple parish was entitled to two votes, one by a pastor
and the other by a lay delegate, was reexamined and affirmed by the
Commission on Constitutional Matters:
79. Voting Rights of Congregations (09-2545)
In a January 18, 2009 e-mailed letter, a parish pastor requested an opinion with respect to the representation of a four-congregation partnership
(a multiple-congregation parish) at a district convention.
Question:	Four congregations have formed a partnership. They each
have called the two pastors who serve this partnership. Can
each of the four congregations send a lay delegate to our
district convention which is in June? Also, what is the status
of the two pastors in regards to being the pastoral delegate
or delegates to the district convention?
Opinion: The four-congregation partnership is entitled to two votes, that
of a pastor who serves the four-congregation partnership and a lay delegate, both chosen by the four-congregation partnership.
Article V of the Synod’s Constitution states: “At the meetings of the
districts of the Synod, every congregation or parish is entitled to two
votes, one of which is to be cast by the pastor and the other by the lay
delegate.”
In its Opinion 03-2327 (January 20–21, 2003), the Commission on Constitutional Matters opined with respect to Article V the opinion, “Voting
Rights of Congregations,” included the definition of the term “parish”
and addressed a multiple-congregation arrangement.
“In the May 3–4, 1985 ruling (Ag. 1748), the commission ratified an
opinion that had been offered by the Secretary of the Synod regarding the voting rights of congregations at district conventions when
several congregations form a dual or multiple parish, namely, ‘that a
multiple parish has only two votes, that of the pastor who serves the
parish and a lay delegate chosen by the parish.’
“This opinion took into consideration earlier versions of the Handbook that had provided a definition of the term ‘parish,’ e.g., ‘If a
pastor serves two or more congregations, these shall be regarded as
one parish and shall be entitled to only one lay vote’ (1963 Handbook, Bylaw 3.09). The term [parish] therefore refers to a dual or
multiple-congregation arrangement served by the same pastor and is
not synonymous with ‘congregation.’ As such, two or more congre-

2013 Convention Workbook

gations are served by one pastor share the right of representation by
one lay delegate and one pastoral delegate to a district convention.”
The four-congregation partnership constitutes one “parish” as defined
above.

Article V of the Constitution, however, does not specifically address the issue of voting at forums of circuits. Voting at the forums
of circuits is addressed in the Bylaws. Bylaw 3.1.2.1 describes the
policy and process of voting at meetings of electoral circuits for the
purpose of selecting the delegates of that circuit to conventions of
the national Synod.
Bylaw 3.1.2.1 (c) delineates who has the privilege of voting in
these electoral circuit meetings. It specifies that the vote is exercised
by one pastor and one layperson from each member congregation
of the circuit, who are selected in the manner prescribed by the congregation. A second sentence then continues and specifies that each
congregation in a multiple-congregation parish is entitled to a lay
vote. The second sentence was added to the Handbook in 1973 incorporating rulings from the Commission on Constitutional Matters
in 1968 and 1970:
142. Right to Vote for Convention Delegates: The Secretary of the
Southern District had phoned Sommermeyer asking whether each congregation is entitled to vote in the election of the delegate to a synodical convention or only each parish. The commission resolved to inform
Secretary Kleinhans of its interpretation that each congregation in a
multiple parish is entitled to a separate vote. (June 13–14, 1968 minutes
of the Commission on Constitutional Matters)
115. Election of Convention Delegates, Bylaw 1.53: The commission
formally ruled that each congregation in a multiple parish is entitled to
a lay ballot in this matter but that a pastor of a dual or multiple parish
should cast only one ballot.

The 1973 resolution adopting this insertion into the Handbook
states in part:
Whereas, The bylaw on the election of delegates to synodical conventions is derived from the terms of the Constitution which explicitly
describe the Synod to be a federation of congregations which alone possess the franchise and have the power to determine who shall exercise
the pastoral and lay vote at synodical conventions.

Since the right to vote belongs to congregations, therefore at the
circuit forum to elect delegates to the conventions of the national
Synod, each congregation of a multiple-congregation parish is entitled
to one vote from a lay member of that congregation as expressly allowed by Bylaw 3.1.2.1 (c).
In the case of the pastor/pastors in a multiple-congregation parish
the situation is different. He/they are called by and serve the whole. In
a multiple-congregation parish with more than one pastor, these pastors are still pastors of the entire multiple-congregation parish and not
simply one of the congregations. Even if a pastor primarily serves one
of the congregations, he remains a pastor of the whole. Therefore only
one pastor would be eligible to represent the multiple-congregation
parish at meetings of the circuit forum to elect delegates to a convention of the national Synod. The Bylaws do not grant pastors a similar
exception as given for the laity.
Question 2: In the case of a dual parish with two called pastors, may
both pastors of this dual parish vote at the circuit forum
to select a circuit counselor, each pastor representing a
different congregation (governed by Bylaws 5.2.2 [c]
and 5.3.2)?
Opinion: No. In contrast to lay representatives to circuit forums
who are affiliated with only one congregation, a pastor/pastors of a
multiple-congregation parish is/are called by and serve the whole.
Therefore only one pastor of a multiple-congregation parish that
has more than one pastor is entitled to vote for the multiple-con-