Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2013 · 65th Convention, St. Louis › Page 98

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2013, Page 98

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

98

SYNOD REPORTS

• CUEnet has begun work on an innovative new curriculum for
churches and schools called Gemstones of Faith. These high-definition videos will utilize music, photography, art, lecture, story and
many other means to introduce major doctrines and detailed theological nuggets. Pastors, teachers, and lay Bible study instructors
will be able to use these videos to enhance their work in LCMS
congregations.
• In parallel with the creation of Gemstones of Faith, new colloquy
materials are being crafted so as to better utilize current video techniques, standards, and technologies. Once again, CUEnet will use
outstanding theologians from the CUS institutions and the seminaries to help produce the “video textbooks” used in the online
colloquy program.
Alan Borcherding, Interim President

The task force elected as its officers Dr. Dean Wenthe, Mr. John
Behrendt, and Dr. Dennis Witte.
The task force, assisted by staff from the International Center, has
found in the fulfillment of this assignment reason for optimism and
encouragement. We now wish to share with the Synod in convention
the fruits of our work in keeping with the three-fold assignment given.

R5-02

Our task force understands that “efficiency” can be understood in
different ways, and even in ways that suggest “cheap” or “cut-rate.”
These are not adjectives that should go with our system of higher education and preparation of church workers. Our schools have pursued
efficiencies of operation not through shrinkage or consolidation but
by offering excellent opportunities for education while retaining their
Lutheran confessional identity. Though the pool of potential churchwork students is smaller, our schools have worked even harder to
attract them.
Some have suggested that consolidation or shrinkage of our
schools to provide education only for the shrinking pool of churchwork students would be more efficient, but the facts seem to indicate
differently. While the primary mission of our system of LCMS
higher education remains the preparation of faithful and well-prepared church workers, the secondary mission of preparing lay men
and women for a variety of vocations in a distinctively Lutheran
Christian context actually supports this mission by providing the
financial support needed for economies of scale. Through competition with community-based, other private, and state colleges and
universities as well as the rigors of accrediting agencies, our schools
have become models of efficient operation, collaborating and innovating in degree programs and other activities.
There are many good examples of CUS collaboration. CUS has
operated the Concordia Administrative Information System (CAIS)
since 2000, providing eight of the campuses with services to operate
a common, industry leading, higher education administrative software system. CUEnet was formed in 1996, initially to share courses
between the CUS schools and Lutheran high schools, and since 2001
has been the provider of the very successful online teacher colloquy
program for the Synod. The CUS schools share a number of national
contracts, some in cooperation with LCMS General Services and
some on their own. Despite the challenges of accreditation across
different regions of the nation, there are also numerous examples of
academic collaborations such as the joint online MA in Education
developed by Irvine and Portland, a new joint MBA program developed by Mequon and Seward, and cooperative international study
activities.
The funding model for our system of higher education has changed
and continues to do so. Shrinking resources sent to the national Synod
curtail the subsidy that can be provided to our schools, while direct
support of donors, growth of tuition income from increased enrollment, development efforts under the direction of the local boards of
regents of the seminaries and CUS schools, and support of initiatives
such as “For the Sake of the Church” have helped to keep the schools
on a solid fiscal foundation. The transition has not been painless, but
it is working. The Synod continues to fund its institutions, but in a
different way. Rather than seeking to centralize this support, or to
recommend shrinking our system in a time of great growth, we are

Report and Recommendations: 4-04A Task Force
January 2013
The 64th Regular Convention (2010) of The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod adopted Res. 4-04A, which
resolved:
That the Synod in convention charge the Board of Directors of the
Synod, in consultation and concurrence with CUS and seminary leadership, to appoint an eleven-member task force possessing qualifications in higher education and finance (including two members from the
LCMS Board of Directors as well as persons from the CUS institutions
and seminaries, other institutions of higher education, and the LCMS at
large), to research the efficiency of cooperative interaction for the fiscal
strength of the LCMS system of colleges, universities, and seminaries, to
make recommendations that could be immediately implemented by the
respective institutions and continue to enhance those current programs
already in place with the seminaries and CUS schools, and to bring
recommendations which require convention action to the 2013 LCMS
convention for further implementation.

As instructed by this resolution, the Board of Directors appointed
the following members:
Mr. John Behrendt, Chairman, former LCMS Board for Pastoral Education
Rev. Ralph Blomenberg, Pastor, Immanuel, Seymour, IN; Chair, Board
of Regents, St. Louis
Rev. Dr. Brian Friedrich, President, Concordia University, Nebraska
Mr. Keith Frndak, Member, LCMS Board of Directors
Rev. Dr. Robert Kuhn, Chairman, LCMS Board of Directors
Rev. Dr. David Maier, President, LCMS Michigan District
Rev. Dr. Dale Meyer, President, Concordia Seminary, St. Louis
Dr. Gerhard Mundinger, Member, Concordia University System Board
Rev. Dr. Lawrence Rast, President, Concordia Theological Seminary,
Fort Wayne
Dr. Mary Scott, Provost, Concordia University, Irvine
Rev. Dr. Dien Taylor, Pastor, Redeemer Evan. Lutheran Church, Bronx,
NY
Rev. Dr. Dean Wenthe, President Emeritus, Concordia Theological
Seminary, Fort Wayne
Dr. Dennis Witte, VP for Administration, Concordia University, Chicago

Resource persons from the International Center included:
Rev. Dr. Alan Borcherding, Interim President, Concordia University
System
Mr. Ron Schultz, LCMS Chief Administrative Officer
Rev. Dr. Glen Thomas, Executive Director, LCMS Office of Pastoral
Education

2013 Convention Workbook

(1) To research the efficiency of cooperative interaction for the fiscal
strength of the LCMS system of colleges, universities, and seminaries:

In many ways, the Concordia University System and the Concordia
seminaries are great blessings in the Synod. While membership within
the congregations of Synod continues to decline, shrinking the pool
of LCMS students from which our universities and seminaries often
draw students, enrollment in our CUS schools has shown remarkable
growth, as shown by the following graph: