Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2013 · 65th Convention, St. Louis › Page 90

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2013, Page 90

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

90

SYNOD REPORTS

Major Achievements: Concordia University System

• Facilitated and supported the affiliation of Concordia University,
Ann Arbor, MI, with Concordia University Wisconsin.
• Provided ongoing leadership development for the system through
five cohorts of the CUS Leadership Institute.
• Increased For The Sake of The Church endowment fund contributions and pledges from $197 M to $223 M (cumulative fund totals
from the 10 CUS campuses).
• Continued the ongoing strategic planning process for coordination
of the Concordia University System.
• Facilitated the CUS effort to provide study abroad opportunities
from a uniquely Lutheran perspective for CUS students through
the Concordia International Studies Consortium.
• Enhanced efforts to identify and recruit Lutheran faculty to serve as
professors in the diverse academic programs on the CUS campuses.
• Reviewed and approved all new academic programs and majors at
CUS institutions.
• Initiated the Concordia Choice partnerships between CUS institutions and Lutheran high schools through which graduates fulfilling
specific criterion are guaranteed admission and a $1000 scholarship.
• Promoted cooperative endeavors with the presidents and administrative administrative leaders on the CUS campuses.

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Ann Arbor

$16,279,178

$13,692,134

$10,418,836

$10,901,616

$11,299,449

Austin

24,134,473

26,027,069

29,827,325

34,033,103

35,384,454

Bronxville

16,818,875

17,049,572

18,570,569

18,560,379

19,871,124

Irvine

40,833,648

38,726,924

40,200,144

46,618,505

51,398,870

Mequon

46,242,073

51,248,978

66,016,066

75,929,397

85,998,628

Portland

21,763,666

24,109,148

29,308,131

38,347,279

44,362,375

River Forest

42,519,034

46,092,121

52,146,442

55,377,410

58,441,669

Selma

7,173,585

8,456,856

8,679,372

10,900,443

11,410,017

St. Paul

33,181,875

35,244,637

38,344,083

39,129,514

38,192,991

23,283,767

23,950,575

26,924,387

28,467,744

28,895,593

Seward
Total

$272,230,174 $284,598,014 $320,435,355 $358,265,390 $385,255,170

Scholarships and Financial Aid by Institutions
For Five Years Ending June 30, 2012
Institution

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Ann Arbor

$4,029,661

$3,937,591

$4,181,385

$4,764,540

$5,522,838

Austin

5,876,806

6,757,649

8,231,263

9,281,911

11,127,952

Bronxville

5,287,743

5,123,181

5,062,720

5,402,515

6,040,399

Irvine

10,989,550

12,100,000

13,321,955

13,413,114

14,168,785

Mequon

13,820,983

15,460,626

17,334,080

19,864,612

21,656,856

Portland

7,969,662

8,119,994

9,328,587

10,277,173

11,308,479

River Forest

8,522,522

13,119,147

11,706,239

13,365,976

14,405,375

St. Paul

1,349,045

1,179,120

1,373,809

1,411,173

1,368,798

Selma

8,119,994

8,916,180

9,627,985

10,621,514

12,014,355

11,026,713

12,081,466

13,264,290

Seward

9,082,873

9,880,753

Total

$75,048,839

$84,594,241

2013 Convention Workbook

Institution

FY 2011

FY 2012

FY 2012

FY 2012

Total

Total

# of CW

Aver. Aid

818,208

1,450,400

138

1,318,733

1,272,097

90

14,134

159,165

95,000

6

15,833

Irvine

1,588,667

1,200,300

98

12,247

Mequon

3,459,033

3,045,395

271

11,237

Ann Arbor
Austin
Bronxville

10,510

425,490

290,675

26

11,179

1,685,242

3,330,096

242

13,761

St. Paul

12,511

26,495

4

6,623

Selma

3,177,941

1,403,362

86

16,138

Portland
River Forest

Seward

4,599,990

5,045,510

422

11,956

Total

$17,244,980

$17,159,330

1,383

$12,362

Institutional Operations Summary

Annual Operating Budgets by Institution
For The Five Years Ending June 30, 2012
Institution

Church Worker Financial Aid by Institution
Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012

$91,194,736 $100,483,994 $110,878,127

The CUS Board of Directors has focused its attention on the
ten colleges and universities of the Concordia University System
(CUS). That attention is centered in four “Quality Standards,” which
define the ways that CUS institutions continue to fulfill their mission
as academic institutions and entities of the LCMS. These Quality
Standards provide guidelines to ensure that the Concordias remain
Christ-centered and Lutheran; that they provide strong liberal arts
and professional programs for all students, while continuing to offer
and support church vocational programs; that they strive constantly
for academic quality; and that they achieve and maintain financial
strength.
During the last three years, total CUS enrollment has risen to
nearly 30,000. The largest growth is seen in graduate programs.
Concordia University Wisconsin is the largest Lutheran university
in the nation, followed closely by Concordia University Chicago.
While overall growth has been up, the number of students preparing
for professional church work professions declined.
The CUS Board of Directors has continued strategic planning
as it seeks to support the collective aspirations of the ten campuses.
As small, faith-based institutions, the Concordias value similar
mission statements but frequently face unique challenges. The transformational power of the Gospel and the impetus it provides for
compassionate service to others are fundamental to the existence of
the campuses within the System. Quality in academic programming,
faculty/staff/students, and facilities must be maintained and enhanced.
The ability of each campus to meet and surpass established fiscal
benchmarks is imperative to institutional survival. With the collective
vision for identity, quality, and viability, the CUS Board is working
on the means through which campus leadership is enabled to seize
opportunities for the individual campuses and/or CUS and mobilize
people to achieve their goals.
Believing that much can be achieved through cooperation and
consultation, the CUS office strengthened efforts to foster collaboration among the ten Concordias. The presidents as well as the chief
officers in the areas of academics, enrollment management, finance,
student services, and information technologies meet at least annually
to discuss topics of mutual interest and develop collaborative projects that are mutually beneficial. Teams of experts are often utilized
as consultants on other campuses to provide training or offer advice.