Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2016 · 66th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 281

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2016, Page 281

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 front matter 28 front matter 29 front matter 30 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

IX. REPORT OF THE RES. 5-14A TASK FORCE
teach or preach or administer the sacraments in the church without
a regular call.” Thus the SMP program was intended to replace programs that fell short of that confession in providing pastoral services.
A question has been raised as to whether the Synod was wise in
designating the SMP program for preparing church planters. (The
2013 “Report to the President” recommends “not using it for the
plant­ing of churches.”) This task force notes that church planting
may be a calling that demands even more training than does ministry in an established setting, not the more limited curriculum of the
SMP program. For example, establishing a new congregation requires
making new policy deci­sions on virtually every matter, many of them
significantly theological (matters of worship, admis­sion to the Lord’s
Supper, and so on), while a call to an established parish allows a new
graduate to draw upon the congregation’s experience and previous
decisions. On the other hand, in the case of a daughter congregation
or a satellite situation, a specific ministry pastor under supervision
should be expected to have the resources and experience of the mother
congregation and supervising pastor on which to draw.
Further, the task force notes that 2013 Res. 5-04B, while not precluding the use of SMP for staff pastors, does significantly restrict it;
specific ministry pastors should be used in such situations only when
the congregation is unable to support the second pastor and a commissioned minister could not fulfill the responsibilities.
Admission to the Program
Given the concept and purpose of the program, SMP is to begin
with a context (a place in need of pastoral ministry), rather than beginning with a man aspiring to serve. A congregation identifies a need
appropriate for a specific ministry pastor, then chooses a layman to
be put forth as a candidate for the SMP program. (In fact, in some
cases, a man may already have been pressed into service to address a
local ministry need and now requires training, certification, call, and
placement into the pastoral office as a specific ministry pastor.) The
intent of the program is such that the student does not choose to put
himself forward, but is approached by the congregation. As already
noted, an individual wishing to offer himself for full-time service in
the ministry should plan to attend the residential program of one of
our seminaries, because the residential programs offer broader and
deeper theological and practical training to address the diverse challenges and demands of pastoral ministry.
The actual application process begins with the sponsoring congregation, prospective student, and perhaps a prospective mentor pastor
contacting their district president. If the district president approves the
ministry context as appropriate for an SMP candidate and approves
the candidate and his mentor pastor, the application and supporting
paperwork can be prepared with the help of the seminaries’ admission staffs. The various application documents are collected by the
district office and submitted by the district president to the seminary
admission office, ideally as one completed file. Applicants must also
demonstrate basic competency in biblical knowledge, theological
knowledge, and ministry skills.49
The task force notes the importance of the duty 2013 Res. 5-04B
assigns to district presidents: in recommending men for admission
to the SMP pro­gram, they must properly consider whether the site at
which a man will serve his vicarage and ultimately his call conforms
to the resolution’s guidelines.
Course work, Ordination, and Completion of the Program
The four years in the program include a total of 16 courses,
including both on-campus intensives and courses taught entirely by
distance. As stated above, for the first two years of the SMP program

281

the student is a vicar, assigned to serve in the congregation to which
he will eventually be called.
Of crucial importance throughout the program is the involvement
of the supervising pastor (mentor). It is essential that the mentor pastor commit to actively directing the student, not only in the practical
activities of pastoral service but also in the academic work of his
courses. The mentor should be involved in the courses in various ways
such as weekly required discussion of course content and assignments
with the student. The program assumes mentors are required to attend
with the student the new student/mentor orientation (just as new vicarage supervisors in the residential programs are required to attend a
supervisors conference at one of the seminaries).
Once a student has completed the first eight (or nine) courses
(depending on the seminary); has received a favorable report from
his vicarage supervisor and mentor, as well as his district president;
has been requested in call documents issued by the congregation and
approved by the district president; and has passed a theological interview and been certified by the seminary faculty, he is eligible for
call and placement, followed by ordination. (A number of more specific steps in this certification, placement, and ordination process are
required but are not detailed here.) After ordination, the student must
complete the final two years of the program in order to remain on the
clergy roster. If he fails to do so, his district president is required to
remove him from the roster of the Synod (2007 Res. 5-01B).
The task force has noted some concerns with this model:
Most obviously, ordination after just eight or nine courses is an
extremely brief route to the ministry. St. Paul warns Timothy, “Do not
be hasty in the laying on of hands” (1 Timothy 5:22). Moreover, his
admonition that pastors be “able to teach” (1 Timothy 3:2; 2 Timothy
2:24) is a matter not primarily of innate talent, but of knowledge and
understanding of the whole doctrine of the church (1 Timothy 1:3;
6:2–3; 2 Timothy 2:15; Titus 1:9; 2:1)—no small assignment. While,
of course, Scripture never prescribes a curriculum or time frame for
training to teach, it may be helpful to recognize that eight (or nine)
courses is the equivalent (in terms of the number of academic courses)
of only about the first half of the first year of the residential seminary
curriculum.50 It is also worth noting that each of the other certificate
programs (EIIT, CHS, etc.) provide for ordination only upon completion of the full programs (16 or more courses). This is also why
specific ministry pastors remain under supervision and are restricted
to a specific ministry.
Moreover, such a brief curriculum prior to ordination necessitates certain compromises. The curricula of the seminaries provide,
of course, to give students a foundational exposure to all the teachings necessary to take the ordination vows and be faithful to them
(such as to subscribe unconditionally to the Lutheran Confessions
and faithfully and pastorally admit to the Lord’s Supper). However,
at each of the two seminaries, the more in-depth course content in two
or more of the following areas is not studied until after eligibility for
ordination: the nature of the Scriptures, Old and New Testament theology, the church, and the Lord’s Supper. In other words, men may be
ordained (and thus be responsible for, among countless other matters,
admission to the Lord’s Table) without the more extensive study in the
formal principles of our theology, matters of fellowship, or even the
Sacrament itself. These do not represent oversights in the two seminaries’ curricular designs, but rather inherent challenges in preparing
men for pastoral ministry with such time and curricular limitations.
Finally, a man’s failing to complete, for whatever reason, his
post-ordination courses would create a most troublesome situation.
By resolution of the Synod, the pastor must be removed from the
2016 Convention Workbook