Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2016 · 66th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 281
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2016, Page 281
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
front matter 28
front matter 29
front matter 30
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
IX. REPORT OF THE RES. 5-14A TASK FORCE
teach or preach or administer the sacraments in the church without
a regular call.” Thus the SMP program was intended to replace programs that fell short of that confession in providing pastoral services.
A question has been raised as to whether the Synod was wise in
designating the SMP program for preparing church planters. (The
2013 “Report to the President” recommends “not using it for the
planting of churches.”) This task force notes that church planting
may be a calling that demands even more training than does ministry in an established setting, not the more limited curriculum of the
SMP program. For example, establishing a new congregation requires
making new policy decisions on virtually every matter, many of them
significantly theological (matters of worship, admission to the Lord’s
Supper, and so on), while a call to an established parish allows a new
graduate to draw upon the congregation’s experience and previous
decisions. On the other hand, in the case of a daughter congregation
or a satellite situation, a specific ministry pastor under supervision
should be expected to have the resources and experience of the mother
congregation and supervising pastor on which to draw.
Further, the task force notes that 2013 Res. 5-04B, while not precluding the use of SMP for staff pastors, does significantly restrict it;
specific ministry pastors should be used in such situations only when
the congregation is unable to support the second pastor and a commissioned minister could not fulfill the responsibilities.
Admission to the Program
Given the concept and purpose of the program, SMP is to begin
with a context (a place in need of pastoral ministry), rather than beginning with a man aspiring to serve. A congregation identifies a need
appropriate for a specific ministry pastor, then chooses a layman to
be put forth as a candidate for the SMP program. (In fact, in some
cases, a man may already have been pressed into service to address a
local ministry need and now requires training, certification, call, and
placement into the pastoral office as a specific ministry pastor.) The
intent of the program is such that the student does not choose to put
himself forward, but is approached by the congregation. As already
noted, an individual wishing to offer himself for full-time service in
the ministry should plan to attend the residential program of one of
our seminaries, because the residential programs offer broader and
deeper theological and practical training to address the diverse challenges and demands of pastoral ministry.
The actual application process begins with the sponsoring congregation, prospective student, and perhaps a prospective mentor pastor
contacting their district president. If the district president approves the
ministry context as appropriate for an SMP candidate and approves
the candidate and his mentor pastor, the application and supporting
paperwork can be prepared with the help of the seminaries’ admission staffs. The various application documents are collected by the
district office and submitted by the district president to the seminary
admission office, ideally as one completed file. Applicants must also
demonstrate basic competency in biblical knowledge, theological
knowledge, and ministry skills.49
The task force notes the importance of the duty 2013 Res. 5-04B
assigns to district presidents: in recommending men for admission
to the SMP program, they must properly consider whether the site at
which a man will serve his vicarage and ultimately his call conforms
to the resolution’s guidelines.
Course work, Ordination, and Completion of the Program
The four years in the program include a total of 16 courses,
including both on-campus intensives and courses taught entirely by
distance. As stated above, for the first two years of the SMP program
281
the student is a vicar, assigned to serve in the congregation to which
he will eventually be called.
Of crucial importance throughout the program is the involvement
of the supervising pastor (mentor). It is essential that the mentor pastor commit to actively directing the student, not only in the practical
activities of pastoral service but also in the academic work of his
courses. The mentor should be involved in the courses in various ways
such as weekly required discussion of course content and assignments
with the student. The program assumes mentors are required to attend
with the student the new student/mentor orientation (just as new vicarage supervisors in the residential programs are required to attend a
supervisors conference at one of the seminaries).
Once a student has completed the first eight (or nine) courses
(depending on the seminary); has received a favorable report from
his vicarage supervisor and mentor, as well as his district president;
has been requested in call documents issued by the congregation and
approved by the district president; and has passed a theological interview and been certified by the seminary faculty, he is eligible for
call and placement, followed by ordination. (A number of more specific steps in this certification, placement, and ordination process are
required but are not detailed here.) After ordination, the student must
complete the final two years of the program in order to remain on the
clergy roster. If he fails to do so, his district president is required to
remove him from the roster of the Synod (2007 Res. 5-01B).
The task force has noted some concerns with this model:
Most obviously, ordination after just eight or nine courses is an
extremely brief route to the ministry. St. Paul warns Timothy, “Do not
be hasty in the laying on of hands” (1 Timothy 5:22). Moreover, his
admonition that pastors be “able to teach” (1 Timothy 3:2; 2 Timothy
2:24) is a matter not primarily of innate talent, but of knowledge and
understanding of the whole doctrine of the church (1 Timothy 1:3;
6:2–3; 2 Timothy 2:15; Titus 1:9; 2:1)—no small assignment. While,
of course, Scripture never prescribes a curriculum or time frame for
training to teach, it may be helpful to recognize that eight (or nine)
courses is the equivalent (in terms of the number of academic courses)
of only about the first half of the first year of the residential seminary
curriculum.50 It is also worth noting that each of the other certificate
programs (EIIT, CHS, etc.) provide for ordination only upon completion of the full programs (16 or more courses). This is also why
specific ministry pastors remain under supervision and are restricted
to a specific ministry.
Moreover, such a brief curriculum prior to ordination necessitates certain compromises. The curricula of the seminaries provide,
of course, to give students a foundational exposure to all the teachings necessary to take the ordination vows and be faithful to them
(such as to subscribe unconditionally to the Lutheran Confessions
and faithfully and pastorally admit to the Lord’s Supper). However,
at each of the two seminaries, the more in-depth course content in two
or more of the following areas is not studied until after eligibility for
ordination: the nature of the Scriptures, Old and New Testament theology, the church, and the Lord’s Supper. In other words, men may be
ordained (and thus be responsible for, among countless other matters,
admission to the Lord’s Table) without the more extensive study in the
formal principles of our theology, matters of fellowship, or even the
Sacrament itself. These do not represent oversights in the two seminaries’ curricular designs, but rather inherent challenges in preparing
men for pastoral ministry with such time and curricular limitations.
Finally, a man’s failing to complete, for whatever reason, his
post-ordination courses would create a most troublesome situation.
By resolution of the Synod, the pastor must be removed from the
2016 Convention Workbook