Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2016 · 66th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 244

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2016, Page 244

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 front matter 28 front matter 29 front matter 30 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

244

VII. 2013 RES. 4-06A TASK FORCE REPORT TO THE SYNOD
continuing education units (CEUs) and of other noncredit academic
and professional experiences completed. The Colloquy Committee
reserves the right to seek independent validation of credit.

10. The district president shall attach a cover letter to the application
package that declares his strong endorsement and sponsorship of the
applicant. The district president’s letter must also give clear and cogent
reasons why the colloquy applicant cannot enter the seminary alternate route or the seminary SMP program. The district president shall
make sure all requested information has been provided and shall send
the completed package with appropriate signatures to the First VicePresident of the Synod as chairman of the Colloquy Committee for
the Pastoral Ministry. The applicant (and, if married, his wife) and the
sponsoring district president must sign this application form where
indicated.

C. Expanded Colloquy Committee
According to the Bylaws of the Synod, the Colloquy Committee
for the Pastoral Ministry consists of four individuals—a representative
of the Council of Presidents, the two seminary presidents (or their representatives), and the First Vice-President. A process for licensed lay
deacons to enter the SMP roster by colloquy would require expanded
colloquy interview committees. The task force proposes the creation
of at least two colloquy interview committees (in addition to the regular Colloquy Committee for the Pastoral Ministry) specifically tasked
with interviewing licensed lay deacon applicants for colloquy to the
SMP roster. The membership of these two extra committees would
include
•

two additional district presidents selected by the Council of Presidents
(district presidents emeriti would be eligible to serve), one for each
committee;

•

two additional seminary professors (normally the head of each seminary’s SMP program to provide continuity; seminary professors
emeriti would qualify); and

•

two parish pastors who have experience with licensed lay deacons,
appointed by the President of the Synod.65

These additional Colloquy Committees appointed to work with the
districts to colloquize licensed lay deacons to the SMP roster could
meet in the parts of the country convenient to the deacons applying (e.g., not only St. Louis, but also in Portland, Irvine, etc.). Other
ordained men should be asked to help with the interviews on an ad
hoc basis (as is done now with the regular colloquy interview process).
In fact, the task force believes this feature of our recommendations
will be essential for understanding the context in which the colloquy
applicants are working and the specific needs of the congregations
these deacons presently serve. In other words, pastors who are more
familiar with the cultures of a specific area should be involved in
the certification process of the men from that area, as they are colloquized to the Specific Ministry Pastor roster. The process (including
selection of the ad hoc assistants for the interviews) would still be generally overseen by the First Vice-President as chair of the Colloquy
Committee for the Pastoral Ministry, who would need to allocate time
adequate to the task. Such oversight would help to assure transparochial examination and approval.
Extensive revisions are needed to the Colloquy Policy Manual to
reflect these changes. For instance, the current policy manual allows
for application for colloquy by licensed lay deacons, but only after
ten year’s service in full responsibility for Word and Sacrament. The
proposal outlined in this report requires all present licensed lay deacons, if they do not enter a seminary program, to undergo colloquy
to be ordained and placed on the roster of specific ministry pastors.
2016 Convention Workbook

D. Colloquy Interview
Each application, once received, would be reviewed by one of
the special Colloquy Committees and, if acceptable, the applicant
would be invited to an interview (these could take place at locations
other than St. Louis). The interview committee would have authority to certify immediately; to certify while also requiring additional
study after certification; to require further study before certification;
to require further study with eventual reconsideration; or to decline
to certify. Men who take the vow of ordination pledging faithfulness
to the Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions must know what they
are promising by that vow.
E. Theological Preparation, Continuing Education,
and Ongoing Supervision
Because colloquy is based on individual capabilities and needs,
some, and perhaps many, candidates will exhibit a fully acceptable
level of theological competence and would then be immediately certified for congregational call, ordination, and rostering. It may also
be that many other applicants for SMP colloquy will require further
study to enable them to be “able to teach” at a basic level. At its discretion, the Colloquy Committee may require such study either prior
to or after certification for ordination. To insure some uniformity of
preparation and for the sake of efficiency, however, the task force
proposes that the seminary faculties jointly prepare an intensive (one
week) course for all SMP colloquy candidates,66 taught by two professors (one from each seminary) and offered in geographic locales that
make participation simple and viable. The course would be offered
in a retreat setting and would focus on the Lutheran approach to
Scripture and doctrine. This course may also be an aid to identifying
areas of required future study.
Further study beyond such an intensive course should be individually determined and may be engaged under the guidance of a mentor
(perhaps utilizing the establishment of a cohort of LLDs preparing for
ordination), according to the determination of needs by the Colloquy
Committee. Moreover, after ordination, as specific ministry pastors,
these colloquized men will continue to serve under a mentor for the
duration of their ministry. Gaps in the preparation of candidates may
readily be filled by mentored readings based on the application and
the interview. As an individualized process, the Colloquy Committee
must endeavor to take into account the particular abilities, needs, attitudes and level of knowledge of each individual applicant. However,
the mentored study requirements should not be arbitrary, and the task
force proposes that the Colloquy Committee also develop standard
reading courses for the applicants to work on as a form of continuing education with their mentors, utilizing basic resources (e.g., the
entire Book of Concord, Koehler’s Summary of Christian Doctrine,
Luther’s 1535 Lectures on Galatians (AE 26–27), Walther’s Law and
Gospel, The Lutheran Difference, in-depth studies of biblical books,
Christian Dogmatics). Sponsoring district presidents should recommend necessary mentors and be kept informed as to the progress
made by the applicant, sharing that progress in regular reports to the
Synod’s Colloquy Committee.
It must be recognized that while SMP colloquy applicants must
meet a minimum level of understanding to make with integrity the
promises required by the ordination vow, these men most likely
will not possess the same level of knowledge as a general pastor. Of
course, it is also true that not all seminary-trained pastors are equal in
their ability to teach and that competent ministry involves more than
intellectual or doctrinal understanding. The task force fully expects
that the godly men who are serving as deacons today will serve with