Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2016 · 66th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 244
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2016, Page 244
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
front matter 28
front matter 29
front matter 30
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
244
VII. 2013 RES. 4-06A TASK FORCE REPORT TO THE SYNOD
continuing education units (CEUs) and of other noncredit academic
and professional experiences completed. The Colloquy Committee
reserves the right to seek independent validation of credit.
10. The district president shall attach a cover letter to the application
package that declares his strong endorsement and sponsorship of the
applicant. The district president’s letter must also give clear and cogent
reasons why the colloquy applicant cannot enter the seminary alternate route or the seminary SMP program. The district president shall
make sure all requested information has been provided and shall send
the completed package with appropriate signatures to the First VicePresident of the Synod as chairman of the Colloquy Committee for
the Pastoral Ministry. The applicant (and, if married, his wife) and the
sponsoring district president must sign this application form where
indicated.
C. Expanded Colloquy Committee
According to the Bylaws of the Synod, the Colloquy Committee
for the Pastoral Ministry consists of four individuals—a representative
of the Council of Presidents, the two seminary presidents (or their representatives), and the First Vice-President. A process for licensed lay
deacons to enter the SMP roster by colloquy would require expanded
colloquy interview committees. The task force proposes the creation
of at least two colloquy interview committees (in addition to the regular Colloquy Committee for the Pastoral Ministry) specifically tasked
with interviewing licensed lay deacon applicants for colloquy to the
SMP roster. The membership of these two extra committees would
include
•
two additional district presidents selected by the Council of Presidents
(district presidents emeriti would be eligible to serve), one for each
committee;
•
two additional seminary professors (normally the head of each seminary’s SMP program to provide continuity; seminary professors
emeriti would qualify); and
•
two parish pastors who have experience with licensed lay deacons,
appointed by the President of the Synod.65
These additional Colloquy Committees appointed to work with the
districts to colloquize licensed lay deacons to the SMP roster could
meet in the parts of the country convenient to the deacons applying (e.g., not only St. Louis, but also in Portland, Irvine, etc.). Other
ordained men should be asked to help with the interviews on an ad
hoc basis (as is done now with the regular colloquy interview process).
In fact, the task force believes this feature of our recommendations
will be essential for understanding the context in which the colloquy
applicants are working and the specific needs of the congregations
these deacons presently serve. In other words, pastors who are more
familiar with the cultures of a specific area should be involved in
the certification process of the men from that area, as they are colloquized to the Specific Ministry Pastor roster. The process (including
selection of the ad hoc assistants for the interviews) would still be generally overseen by the First Vice-President as chair of the Colloquy
Committee for the Pastoral Ministry, who would need to allocate time
adequate to the task. Such oversight would help to assure transparochial examination and approval.
Extensive revisions are needed to the Colloquy Policy Manual to
reflect these changes. For instance, the current policy manual allows
for application for colloquy by licensed lay deacons, but only after
ten year’s service in full responsibility for Word and Sacrament. The
proposal outlined in this report requires all present licensed lay deacons, if they do not enter a seminary program, to undergo colloquy
to be ordained and placed on the roster of specific ministry pastors.
2016 Convention Workbook
D. Colloquy Interview
Each application, once received, would be reviewed by one of
the special Colloquy Committees and, if acceptable, the applicant
would be invited to an interview (these could take place at locations
other than St. Louis). The interview committee would have authority to certify immediately; to certify while also requiring additional
study after certification; to require further study before certification;
to require further study with eventual reconsideration; or to decline
to certify. Men who take the vow of ordination pledging faithfulness
to the Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions must know what they
are promising by that vow.
E. Theological Preparation, Continuing Education,
and Ongoing Supervision
Because colloquy is based on individual capabilities and needs,
some, and perhaps many, candidates will exhibit a fully acceptable
level of theological competence and would then be immediately certified for congregational call, ordination, and rostering. It may also
be that many other applicants for SMP colloquy will require further
study to enable them to be “able to teach” at a basic level. At its discretion, the Colloquy Committee may require such study either prior
to or after certification for ordination. To insure some uniformity of
preparation and for the sake of efficiency, however, the task force
proposes that the seminary faculties jointly prepare an intensive (one
week) course for all SMP colloquy candidates,66 taught by two professors (one from each seminary) and offered in geographic locales that
make participation simple and viable. The course would be offered
in a retreat setting and would focus on the Lutheran approach to
Scripture and doctrine. This course may also be an aid to identifying
areas of required future study.
Further study beyond such an intensive course should be individually determined and may be engaged under the guidance of a mentor
(perhaps utilizing the establishment of a cohort of LLDs preparing for
ordination), according to the determination of needs by the Colloquy
Committee. Moreover, after ordination, as specific ministry pastors,
these colloquized men will continue to serve under a mentor for the
duration of their ministry. Gaps in the preparation of candidates may
readily be filled by mentored readings based on the application and
the interview. As an individualized process, the Colloquy Committee
must endeavor to take into account the particular abilities, needs, attitudes and level of knowledge of each individual applicant. However,
the mentored study requirements should not be arbitrary, and the task
force proposes that the Colloquy Committee also develop standard
reading courses for the applicants to work on as a form of continuing education with their mentors, utilizing basic resources (e.g., the
entire Book of Concord, Koehler’s Summary of Christian Doctrine,
Luther’s 1535 Lectures on Galatians (AE 26–27), Walther’s Law and
Gospel, The Lutheran Difference, in-depth studies of biblical books,
Christian Dogmatics). Sponsoring district presidents should recommend necessary mentors and be kept informed as to the progress
made by the applicant, sharing that progress in regular reports to the
Synod’s Colloquy Committee.
It must be recognized that while SMP colloquy applicants must
meet a minimum level of understanding to make with integrity the
promises required by the ordination vow, these men most likely
will not possess the same level of knowledge as a general pastor. Of
course, it is also true that not all seminary-trained pastors are equal in
their ability to teach and that competent ministry involves more than
intellectual or doctrinal understanding. The task force fully expects
that the godly men who are serving as deacons today will serve with